AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database does not contain direct head-to-head test results between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and the Intel Core i5-14401E. Instead, each processor is measured against its own set of comparison workloads, which makes a direct side-by-side score comparison impossible for identical tests. The AMD part carries a PassMark-based average benchmark score of 62,498, while the Intel part carries a Cinebench-based average score of 5,253. These averages come from different test suites, so they cannot be used to declare a winner in any specific workload.

What the data does show is how each processor positions against its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 sits at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 62,498. Its closest competitor in the database is the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, which scores 62,738, a delta of -0.4% meaning the AMD part trails by less than half a percent. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 62,839, a delta of -0.5%. The Intel Core i7-13790F scores 63,080, a delta of -0.9%. The AMD part leads the Intel Core i9-13900KF, which scores 61,841, by a delta of 1.1%. These deltas are all within roughly one percentage point, indicating that the AMD processor is tightly clustered with high-end desktop and mobile parts in overall PassMark performance.

The Intel Core i5-14401E sits at the 60th percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 5,253. Its nearest rival is the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4, which scores 5,259, a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core i7-11700B scores 5,241, a delta of 0.2%. The Intel Core i9-10850K scores 5,240, a delta of 0.2%. The Intel Core i5-13400T scores 5,210, a delta of 0.8%. The Intel part leads all four of its nearest rivals, but the margins are small, from 0.2% to 0.8%. This suggests the Core i5-14401E is competitive with older high-end desktop processors but does not reach the same overall performance tier as the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465, which outperforms its nearest rivals by a similar margin.

Looking at the individual PassMark sub-tests for the AMD part, the strongest result is in data compression, with a score of 385,174. Integer math scores 107,173, floating-point math scores 66,824, and extended instructions score 26,441. Random string sorting scores 40,860, data encryption scores 19,308, and find prime numbers scores 126. The single-thread score is 4,168, and the multithread score is 31,485. The physics sub-test scores 1,747. For the Intel part, the Cinebench R23 multicore score is 18,161 and the single-core score is 2,564. The Cinebench R20 multicore score is 7,627 and single-core is 1,076. The Cinebench R15 multicore score is 1,830 and single-core is 258.

These scores are not directly comparable, but they do show each processor's strengths within its own benchmark suite. The AMD part shows a very high data compression result relative to its other sub-tests, while the Intel part shows a strong multicore Cinebench result relative to its single-core scores. The database records no wins for either processor in a head-to-head field, meaning no direct comparison tests were run.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14401E uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series with a Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel part is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD die size is 233 mm², while the Intel die is 215 mm².

The core counts differ significantly. The AMD processor has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel processor has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The AMD TDP is 28 watts, while the Intel TDP is 65 watts. Both processors have locked multipliers.

Cache layouts differ. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support differs as well: the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory. The AMD memory bandwidth is listed at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. ECC memory support differs: the AMD part does not support ECC, while the Intel part does.

PCIe support also differs. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part has a Radeon 890M, while the Intel part has UHD Graphics 730. The AMD socket is AMD Socket FP8, indicating a mobile platform, while the Intel socket is Intel Socket 1700, indicating a desktop platform. The AMD market segment is Mobile, while the Intel market segment is Desktop. The AMD release date is recorded as January 2026, while the Intel release date is June 2024.

The Verdict

The data shows two processors aimed at different segments. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is a mobile processor with a 28-watt TDP, 10 cores, and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. It sits at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include high-end desktop parts like the Intel Core i9-13900KF, which it leads by 1.1%. The Intel Core i5-14401E is a desktop processor with a 65-watt TDP, 6 cores, and a 4.70 GHz boost clock. It sits at the 60th percentile, and its nearest rivals are older desktop chips like the Intel Core i9-10850K, which it leads by 0.2%.

For mobile workloads, the AMD part is the clear choice based on the recorded data. It offers more cores, a higher boost clock, a smaller process node, and a much lower TDP. Its percentile rank places it among the top 7% of all CPUs in the database. For desktop workloads, the Intel part offers ECC memory support, PCIe Gen 5, and a higher base clock. However, its percentile rank of 60 is well below the AMD part's 93, and its nearest rivals are older parts that it barely beats.

The database does not include direct benchmark comparisons, so a workload-by-workload verdict is not possible. What the data does indicate is that the AMD processor is in a higher overall performance tier. Its average benchmark score of 62,498 places it alongside the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and the Intel Core i7-13790F, while the Intel Core i5-14401E's average score of 5,253 places it alongside the Intel Core i7-11700B and the Intel Core i9-10850K. These are different performance classes, and the AMD part is the stronger one in overall terms.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification field. The AMD part has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel part has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz, the Intel base clock is 2.50 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 5.00 GHz, the Intel boost clock is 4.70 GHz. The AMD TDP is 28 watts, the Intel TDP is 65 watts.

The process node differs: AMD uses 4 nm at TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm at Intel. Die size is 233 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel. L2 cache per core is 1 MB for AMD and 1.25 MB for Intel. L3 cache is 16 MB for AMD and 20 MB for Intel. Memory support: AMD uses DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel uses DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s for AMD, and not recorded for Intel. ECC support: AMD has none, Intel has it. PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD has Radeon 890M, Intel has UHD Graphics 730. Socket: AMD FP8 versus Intel 1700. Market segment: Mobile versus Desktop. Release date: January 2026 versus June 2024. Both have locked multipliers, both have 80 KB L1 per core, and both use dual-channel memory.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The AMD part boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel part boosts to 4.70 GHz. The Intel part has a higher base clock at 2.50 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for AMD.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 does not.

Q: How do their overall performance percentiles compare?

A: The AMD processor is at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel processor is at the 60th percentile.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor uses a newer PCIe standard?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 wins in core count, thread count, boost clock, process node, TDP efficiency, and overall performance percentile. Its 10 cores and 20 threads are substantially more than the Intel part's 6 cores and 12 threads. The 5.00 GHz boost clock is higher than the Intel's 4.70 GHz. The 4 nm process at TSMC is smaller than the Intel 10 nm process. The 28-watt TDP is less than half of the Intel's 65-watt TDP. The 93rd percentile ranking places it far above the Intel's 60th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-13900KF, which it leads by 1.1%, indicating desktop-class performance in a mobile package.

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in base clock, L2 cache per core, L3 cache size, ECC memory support, PCIe generation, and market segment. The 2.50 GHz base clock is higher than the AMD's 2.00 GHz. The 1.25 MB L2 per core is larger than the AMD's 1 MB. The 20 MB shared L3 cache is larger than the AMD's 16 MB. ECC memory support is exclusive to the Intel part. PCIe Gen 5 is a newer standard than Gen 4. The desktop segment means it uses the Intel Socket 1700, which is a different platform from the mobile AMD Socket FP8. Its nearest rivals are older desktop chips like the Intel Core i9-10850K and the Intel Core i7-11700B, which it beats by 0.2% each.