AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Core i7-13790F Comparison

The Intel Core i7-13790F and AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 occupy the same performance percentile (93rd) among all CPUs, yet they achieve that standing through entirely different strategies. The Intel part is a 16-core desktop processor built on a 10 nm process with a 65 W TDP, while the AMD part is a 10-core mobile processor on a 4 nm node with a 28 W TDP. Benchmark data shows the Intel chip winning all 11 head-to-head comparisons, but the margin of victory varies wildly from a narrow 1.1% in single-threaded work to a dominant 72.7% in physics simulations. These results suggest the Intel processor is the raw performance leader, while the AMD processor offers a more power-efficient approach for portable systems.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-13790F wins every benchmark category in the head-to-head data, making the use-case split straightforward: it is the superior choice for any workload measured. The largest advantages appear in compute-heavy tasks. In PassMark physics, the Intel chip scores 3017 versus 1747 for the AMD, a 72.7% lead that indicates a substantial edge in simulation and physical calculation workloads. Floating-point math shows a similar pattern, with Intel at 110512 against AMD's 66824, a 65.4% advantage. These results point to the Intel processor being the pick for scientific computing, engineering simulations, or any task that relies heavily on sustained mathematical throughput.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 does not win any of the 11 head-to-head tests, but its competitive positioning comes from context. Its average benchmark score of 62498 places it within 0.9% of the Intel chip's 63080 average, meaning the overall performance gap is small despite losing every individual test. The AMD processor's single-thread score of 4168 trails Intel's 4212 by only 1.1%, showing near-parity in lightly threaded tasks. The AMD chip also brings integrated Radeon 890M graphics, which the Intel part lacks entirely, making it the only one of the two that can run a display without a discrete GPU. For mobile systems where the 28 W TDP matters more than absolute performance, the AMD chip's efficiency profile becomes its primary advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge at nearly every architectural level. The Intel Core i7-13790F uses Raptor Lake architecture on a 10 nm process from Intel's own foundry, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 uses Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel chip features 16 cores and 24 threads, compared to 10 cores and 20 threads for AMD. This core count difference explains much of the multi-threaded performance gap, though the L3 cache disparity is also significant: Intel provides 33 MB shared L3 cache, while AMD offers only 16 MB. Per-core L2 cache also differs, with Intel at 2 MB per core versus AMD's 1 MB per core.

The memory and connectivity specifications further separate them. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, while AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with an explicit memory bandwidth rating of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 20 lanes, whereas the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. Both have locked multipliers and no ECC memory support. The AMD processor includes integrated Radeon 890M graphics, while the Intel chip lists no integrated graphics. Socket and market segment also differ: Intel uses Socket 1700 for desktop systems, while AMD uses Socket FP8 for mobile platforms. The die sizes are similar at 257 mm² for Intel and 233 mm² for AMD, despite the different process nodes.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The PassMark test suite provides a comprehensive comparison across 11 metrics, with the Intel Core i7-13790F winning all of them. The smallest margin comes in single-thread performance, where Intel scores 4212 and AMD scores 4168, a delta of just 1.1%. This indicates that for everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, or single-threaded legacy software, the two processors are functionally equivalent. The data shows two identical listings for single-thread (passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread), both with the same scores and delta, confirming the narrow Intel edge.

Moving to more demanding workloads, the gap widens considerably. In integer math, Intel scores 151416 versus AMD's 107173, a 41.3% advantage. Data compression shows Intel at 567473 against AMD's 385174, a 47.3% lead. Random string sorting favors Intel by 43.4% (58607 versus 40860). Extended instructions see Intel ahead by 31.7% (34828 versus 26441). The multithread test, which aggregates overall parallel performance, gives Intel 44737 and AMD 31485, a 42.1% difference.

The most extreme deltas appear in specialized workloads. Data encryption shows Intel at 31703 versus AMD's 19308, a 64.2% lead. Finding prime numbers favors Intel by 64.3% (207 versus 126). Floating-point math delivers a 65.4% Intel advantage (110512 versus 66824). Physics testing produces the largest margin of all: Intel scores 3017, AMD scores 1747, and the delta reaches 72.7%. These results indicate that the Intel processor's extra cores and larger cache translate into outsized advantages in parallel, compute-intensive scenarios.

The average benchmark scores confirm the overall picture. Intel's average of 63080 edges out AMD's 62498 by approximately 0.9%. The nearest rival data places both processors in similar company: Intel's rivals include the Core Ultra 7 265HX (0.1% behind), Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (0.4% ahead), and Ryzen AI 7 450G (0.4% behind). AMD's nearest rivals include the Core Ultra 7 255HX (0.4% behind), Ryzen AI Embedded P185 (0.5% behind), and Core i9-13900KF (1.1% ahead). This proximity in the broader competitive landscape suggests that while the Intel chip wins this specific matchup, both processors sit within a tight performance cluster.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear but context-dependent recommendation. For desktop users who prioritize raw performance and have no power constraints, the Intel Core i7-13790F is the definitive choice. It wins every benchmark in the comparison, with particularly strong showings in physics (72.7% ahead), floating-point math (65.4% ahead), and prime number finding (64.3% ahead). The 16 cores and 24 threads provide a substantial parallel processing advantage that shows up across the PassMark suite. Its launch MSRP of $441 positions it as a premium desktop part, though pricing considerations are secondary to its performance profile.

For mobile users, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 offers a different trade-off. It operates at a 28 W TDP compared to Intel's 65 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where thermal and power budgets are tight. Its 4 nm TSMC process node is more advanced than Intel's 10 nm node, which contributes to efficiency. The integrated Radeon 890M graphics eliminate the need for a discrete GPU in basic display scenarios. The near-parity in single-thread performance (within 1.1%) means everyday tasks will feel comparable, even though the AMD chip trails significantly in multi-threaded workloads. The choice hinges on whether the user needs the Intel chip's parallel performance or the AMD chip's mobile efficiency and integrated graphics.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i7-13790F has 16 cores and 24 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?

A: The largest delta is in PassMark physics, where the Intel chip scores 3017 versus 1747 for AMD, a 72.7% lead.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has integrated graphics (Radeon 890M). The Intel Core i7-13790F has no integrated graphics.

Q: How close are the processors in single-thread performance?

A: Very close. Intel scores 4212 and AMD scores 4168 in PassMark single-thread tests, a difference of just 1.1%.

Q: What are the power consumption ratings?

A: The Intel chip has a 65 W TDP, while the AMD chip has a 28 W TDP.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-13790F | AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 16 | 10 |

| Threads | 24 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 28 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 5 |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 233 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 33 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | None | Radeon 890M |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2023-02-09 | 2026-01-04 |

| Launch MSRP | $441 | Not specified |

| Part Number | SRMBZ | 100-000001862 |