AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

The database records 2 mobile processors with different design priorities: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and the Intel Core 7 360. The AMD part combines 10 cores and 20 threads on the Zen 5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process, with a 28 W TDP and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The Intel part uses 6 cores and 6 threads on the Wildcat Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm Intel process, with a 15 W TDP and a 4.80 GHz boost clock. In the recorded head-to-head results, AMD wins 9 comparisons and Intel wins 2, both from the same single-thread test. The database average score is 62498 for AMD, placing it in the 93rd percentile, and 18374 for Intel, placing it in the 72nd percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

AMD's largest head-to-head margin is in PassMark integer math. AMD records 107173, Intel records 34238, and the delta is 213 percent. That is more than triple the Intel result. Data compression is next: 385174 versus 142877, a 169.6 percent lead. Random string sorting shows 40860 versus 17636, a 131.7 percent lead. Extended instructions are 26441 versus 12390, a 113.4 percent lead. The multithread score is 31485 versus 15544, a 102.6 percent lead. Those leads are all in triple digits.

AMD also wins encryption, 19308 versus 11164, a 72.9 percent lead; floating point math, 66824 versus 44963, a 48.6 percent lead; physics, 1747 versus 1213, a 44 percent lead; and prime number search, 126 versus 120, a 5 percent lead. The only Intel wins are the 2 identical single-thread entries: 4274 versus 4168, a 2.5 percent margin.

Average-score context puts the 2 parts in different peer groups. The AMD average of 62498 is 0.4 percent below the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, 0.5 percent below the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, 0.9 percent below the Intel Core i7-13790F, and 1.1 percent above the Intel Core i9-13900KF. The Intel average of 18374 is tied with the Intel Core i3-13100, 0.2 percent above the Intel Core 5 330, 0.3 percent above the Intel Core i3-14100, and 0.4 percent above the Intel Core 3 305.

Where Each One Wins

AMD's win pattern is entirely throughput-oriented. Integer math is the clearest signal: a 213 percent lead in arithmetic-heavy parallel work. Data compression and random string sorting, with leads of 169.6 percent and 131.7 percent, indicate strong data-processing throughput. Extended instructions and encryption add 113.4 percent and 72.9 percent leads for workloads that use optimized instruction paths and cryptographic operations. Floating point math, physics, and prime number search also favor AMD, with leads of 48.6 percent, 44 percent, and 5 percent respectively.

Intel's only measured advantage is single-thread performance. The 2.5 percent edge in PassMark single-thread appears in 2 entries, so it is a consistent result. For a workload that cannot use additional cores, the Intel part is the faster part. For any workload that scales with threads, the database shows a decisive AMD advantage: the multithread score is 102.6 percent higher, and the core and thread counts are 10 and 20 against 6 and 6.

The Intel part also has recorded Cinebench numbers: R15 multi-core 1374 and single-core 193, R20 multi-core 5726 and single-core 808, R23 multi-core 13634 and single-core 1924. The database does not include Cinebench results for the AMD part, so these do not enter the head-to-head comparison, but they document the Intel part's absolute performance profile.

The Verdict

The recorded data sorts cleanly by workload type. For multithreaded and data-intensive work, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is clearly the stronger processor. It leads by triple digits in integer math, data compression, random string sorting, extended instructions, and multithread, and it holds a 93rd percentile average-score position. For single-thread-oriented work, the Intel Core 7 360 has a narrow but real edge: 2.5 percent in the only test category it wins. Its average score of 18374 and 72nd percentile place it in a different performance class from the AMD part.

The architecture differences match that split. The AMD part has a 28 W TDP, 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, dual-channel memory, and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The Intel part has a 15 W TDP, 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, single-channel memory, and a 4.80 GHz boost clock. Those differences are consistent with the benchmark result: AMD for parallel throughput, Intel for single-core-oriented tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the single-thread benchmark result?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 scores 4274 in PassMark single-thread, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 scores 4168. Intel's lead is 2.5 percent, and the same result appears in 2 entries.

Q: How large is the AMD multithread advantage?

A: AMD scores 31485 in PassMark multithread, and Intel scores 15544. That is a 102.6 percent lead.

Q: What memory bandwidth do the 2 parts support?

A: AMD supports dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the process nodes?

A: AMD uses a 4 nm TSMC process. Intel uses a 3 nm Intel process.

Q: Which part has more L3 cache?

A: AMD has 16 MB of L3 cache. Intel has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Architecture Differences

The 2 CPUs are built on different silicon. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is a Zen 5 design from the Gorgon Point package, listed as Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), on a 4 nm TSMC process with a 233 mm² die. The Intel Core 7 360 is a Wildcat Lake part listed as Core 5 (Wildcat Lake), on a 3 nm Intel process; its die size is not recorded.

The core and cache layouts differ. AMD provides 10 cores and 20 threads, with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. Intel provides 6 cores and 6 threads, with 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 6 MB of shared L3. Intel has more private cache per core; AMD has more L3.

Both processors support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, and neither supports ECC. AMD runs its memory bus in dual-channel mode with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. Intel runs a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s. PCIe connectivity also favors AMD: Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes versus Gen 4 with 6 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics are Radeon 890M on the AMD part and Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) on the Intel part.

Platform and power figures round out the comparison. AMD uses Socket FP8 and has a 28 W TDP, a 2.00 GHz base clock, and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. Intel uses BGA 1516 and has a 15 W TDP, a 1.50 GHz base clock, and a 4.80 GHz boost clock. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Both are active mobile parts. Release dates are 2026-01-04 for AMD and 2026-04-15 for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $426.