AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 350

CORE STATE Wildcat Lake
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 6 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.5 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 6 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 15W
ARCHITECTURE Wildcat Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
385,174
143,123
passmark_data_encryption
19,308
10,933
passmark_extended_instructions
26,441
12,045
passmark_find_prime_numbers
126
107
passmark_floating_point_math
66,824
42,809
passmark_integer_math
107,173
33,734
passmark_multithread
31,485
15,170
passmark_physics
1,747
1,173
passmark_random_string_sorting
40,860
17,238
passmark_single_thread
4,168
4,100
passmark_singlethread
4,168
4,100
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
1,220
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
292
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
5,373
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
758
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
8,030
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
2,046

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Core 7 350

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and the Intel Core 7 350. Across all 11 shared benchmark tests, the AMD processor wins every single matchup. The most dramatic difference appears in integer math, where the AMD part scores 107,173 against Intel's 33,734, a 217.7% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and reflects the substantial difference in core count and threading capabilities between the two mobile processors.

Data compression results follow a similar pattern. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 delivers a score of 385,174, which is 169.1% higher than the Intel Core 7 350's 143,123. Random string sorting also shows a massive gap, with AMD at 40,860 and Intel at 17,238, a 137% difference. These workloads scale well with additional cores and threads, and the AMD processor has 10 cores and 20 threads versus Intel's 6 cores and 6 threads.

Extended instruction performance favors AMD by 119.5%. The Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 records 26,441 points, while the Core 7 350 manages only 12,045. Multithread performance, a key indicator for general productivity workloads, shows AMD at 31,485 against Intel's 15,170, a 107.5% advantage. The AMD chip effectively doubles the multithread throughput of the Intel part in this test.

Floating point math results show AMD ahead by 56.1%, scoring 66,824 versus 42,809. Physics computations follow with a 48.9% lead for AMD, 1,747 to 1,173. Data encryption performance gives AMD a 76.6% edge, 19,308 to 10,933. Prime number finding, a test that often reflects per-core efficiency, is closer but still favors AMD by 17.8%, 126 to 107.

The single-thread results are the tightest comparison in the entire dataset. AMD scores 4,168 and Intel scores 4,100, a difference of just 1.7%. This indicates that the two processors have broadly comparable per-core performance, despite the AMD chip's higher 5.00 GHz boost clock versus Intel's 4.80 GHz. The near parity in single-thread scores means that the massive overall performance gap comes almost entirely from the AMD processor's additional cores and threads rather than from superior core efficiency.

The average benchmark score confirms the overall picture. AMD's Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 averages 62,498 across its recorded benchmarks, while the Intel Core 7 350 averages 17,779. The AMD processor sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the Intel chip sits in the 71st percentile. The Intel part's closest rivals include the Intel Core 5 221TE at a -0.5% delta, the AMD EPYC 9374F at 0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT at -0.6%, and the Intel Core 5 120U at -0.7%. The AMD part's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at -0.4%, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 at -0.5%, the Intel Core i7-13790F at -0.9%, and the Intel Core i9-13900KF at 1.1%.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 outperforms the Intel Core 7 350 in every single measured benchmark. The largest wins come in multi-threaded and parallel workloads, where AMD's 10 cores and 20 threads overwhelm Intel's 6 cores and 6 threads. Anyone whose workloads involve data compression, encryption, extended instruction sets, integer math, floating point math, or multithread rendering will see substantially higher performance from the AMD processor.

The Intel Core 7 350 does offer one meaningful advantage in the recorded data: power consumption. Intel's chip has a 15 W TDP, while the AMD processor is rated at 28 W. This makes the Intel part more suitable for fanless or ultra-low-power designs, where the thermal envelope is the primary constraint. The Intel chip also delivers competitive single-thread performance, trailing the AMD part by only 1.7% in that specific test, so lightly threaded tasks will feel similar on both platforms.

The Intel Core 7 350 carries a launch MSRP of $469. The AMD processor has no recorded launch MSRP.

For a user prioritizing raw compute throughput, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is the clear choice based on the benchmark evidence. For a user prioritizing the lowest possible power draw and smaller physical footprint, the Intel Core 7 350 has the advantage in the recorded specifications. The 71st percentile ranking for the Intel part and the 93rd percentile ranking for the AMD part summarize the overall positioning of these two mobile processors.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 uses the Zen 5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its codename is Gorgon Point, and it belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The die size is recorded at 233 mm².

The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Wildcat Lake) generation. It is built on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry. No architecture designation is recorded in the database for the Intel part, and no die size is listed.

Cache configurations differ significantly between the two processors. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger per-core L1 and L2 caches on the Intel part may help compensate for its smaller L3 pool in certain access patterns, but the AMD part's larger total cache hierarchy supports its greater core count.

The integrated graphics also differ. AMD uses the Radeon 890M, while Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The database does not include direct graphics benchmark comparisons between these two iGPUs, so the relative graphics performance cannot be quantified from the recorded data.

Both processors are mobile parts with active production status. The AMD part was released on January 4, 2026, and the Intel part on April 15, 2026. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts are the most fundamental specification difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 provides 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 provides 6 cores and 6 threads. The Intel part has no hyperthreading support in the recorded specifications.

Clock speeds differ as well. The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD chip holds a 0.20 GHz advantage in boost clocks and a 0.50 GHz advantage at base.

Thermal design power is another point of distinction. The AMD part is rated at 28 W, while the Intel part is rated at 15 W. This 13 W difference is substantial for mobile designs and directly impacts cooling requirements and battery life expectations.

Memory support shows both processors accepting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but the memory bus differs. The AMD chip uses dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel chip uses single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth. This bandwidth difference contributes to the performance gaps observed in memory-sensitive workloads.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD processor offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor offers Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part provides more than double the PCIe lane count.

The sockets are incompatible. AMD uses Socket FP8, while Intel uses BGA 1516. The part numbers differ as well: 100-000001862 for AMD and SAE3F for Intel. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: How much faster is the AMD processor in multithread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 scores 31,485 in the PassMark multithread test, which is 107.5% higher than the Intel Core 7 350's 15,170.

Q: Are the single-thread performances similar?

A: Yes. The AMD processor scores 4,168 and the Intel processor scores 4,100, a difference of only 1.7%.

Q: Which processor has lower power consumption?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has a 15 W TDP, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has a 28 W TDP.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD processor uses dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor uses single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which processor ranks higher in the database's overall CPU percentile?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 ranks in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 350 ranks in the 71st percentile.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 PRO 465
7 350
Core Specs
Cores
10
6 -40.0%
Threads
20
6 -70.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
1.5 -25.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
4.8 -4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
1.5 -25.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
4.8 -4.0%
Multiplier
20
15 -25.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
6 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
15 -46.4%
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Gorgon Point
Wildcat Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Wildcat Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Single-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
59.7 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
DDR5 Speed
—
6400 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel BGA 1516
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 6 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 6
P-Cores: 2 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
1400 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
Yes / 17 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 890M
Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe)
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$469
Part Number
100-000001862
SAE3F
Package
FP8
FC-BGA
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 Details View Core 7 350 Details