AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Core 7 150UL Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts compare between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and the Intel Core 7 150UL?

A: Both processors feature 10 cores. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 supports 20 threads, while the Intel Core 7 150UL supports 12 threads, indicating a difference in simultaneous multithreading implementation.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 150UL uses Intel's 10 nm process node.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz, which is higher than the Intel Core 7 150UL's base clock of 1.70 GHz. Both processors share the same 5.00 GHz boost clock.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 watts, making the Intel chip more power-efficient on paper.

Q: Do these processors use the same socket?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core 7 150UL uses Intel Socket 1700, so they are not interchangeable.

Q: What is the market segment classification for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is classified as a mobile processor, while the Intel Core 7 150UL is classified as a desktop processor.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and Intel Core 7 150UL represent fundamentally different architectural approaches. The AMD part uses Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 7 150UL uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-PS codename, built on Intel's 10 nm process node with a listed die size of null in the database.

Cache organization differs notably between the two. The AMD processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with a 16 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel processor also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but its L2 cache is larger at 1.25 MB per core, while its L3 cache is smaller at 12 MB shared. The higher thread count on the AMD chip (20 threads versus 12) suggests more efficient use of its 10 cores through simultaneous multithreading.

Memory support separates the two as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 7 150UL supports DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, but the database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for it. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD part using Radeon 890M and the Intel part using Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The AMD processor is built for mobile use on Socket FP8, while the Intel processor targets desktop use on Socket 1700.

The Verdict

The recorded data strongly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 for compute-intensive workloads. Its average benchmark score of 62498 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 7 150UL sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0 in the database, meaning no benchmark results are recorded for it.

The AMD processor's 20 threads versus 12 threads gives it a structural advantage in multithreaded tasks. Its higher base clock of 2.00 GHz versus 1.70 GHz, larger L3 cache of 16 MB versus 12 MB, higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and broader PCIe lane count of 16 versus 8 all point to a more capable platform for sustained processing.

The Intel Core 7 150UL does have advantages in specific areas. Its TDP of 15 watts versus 28 watts indicates lower power draw, and its L2 cache is larger at 1.25 MB per core versus 1 MB per core. Its support for DDR4 memory provides flexibility for systems using older memory technology. However, without any recorded benchmark scores, the database cannot quantify its performance relative to the AMD part.

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is the stronger processor for general computing and multithreaded workloads, while the Intel Core 7 150UL may suit power-constrained desktop applications where its lower TDP and DDR4 compatibility are relevant.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification except core count, boost clock, L1 cache per core, ECC memory support, unlocked multiplier status, and production status.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 | Intel Core 7 150UL |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 20 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.70 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | null |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | null |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 8 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | Iris Xe Graphics 96EU |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-04-07 |

| Part Number | 100-000001862 | unknown |

The AMD chip was released later according to the database, with a release date of 2026-01-04 versus 2024-04-07 for Intel. Both processors have a boost clock of 5.00 GHz and are currently active in production. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and the Intel Core 7 150UL, and no wins are recorded for either processor in this pairing. The Intel Core 7 150UL has no individual benchmark scores in the database at all.

For the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465, the recorded benchmark data shows strong performance across multiple workloads. Its multithread score is 31485, its single-thread score is 4168, integer math scores 107173, floating point math scores 66824, and data compression scores 385174. Data encryption scores 19308, extended instructions score 26441, find prime numbers scores 126, physics scores 1747, and random string sorting scores 40860.

The AMD processor's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its standing. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX has an average score of 62738, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD part. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 averages 62839, 0.5% higher. The Intel Core i7-13790F averages 63080, 0.9% higher. The Intel Core i9-13900KF averages 61841, which is 1.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465.

These delta values show the AMD processor sitting in a tight cluster of high-performance chips, with all four nearest rivals within roughly one percentage point of its average score. The 93rd percentile ranking confirms that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database, while the Intel Core 7 150UL's 50th percentile ranking indicates it sits at the median of all recorded processors.

Since the Intel Core 7 150UL lacks recorded benchmark scores, the database cannot provide exact performance deltas between the two chips. The available specification data, including thread count, cache sizes, memory bandwidth, and PCIe lane count, suggests the AMD processor holds the advantage in multi-threaded throughput and platform connectivity, while the Intel processor's lower TDP positions it for lower-power desktop scenarios.