AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and Intel Core 7 150HL are both active processors in the database, but their records are asymmetric. The AMD part carries a set of recorded benchmark results, a 93rd percentile rank, and an average benchmark score of 62498. The Intel part has no benchmark entries, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank. The architecture data also separates them: AMD uses Zen 5 on a 4 nm TSMC process, while Intel uses Raptor Lake on a 10 nm process.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is the only processor in this pair with measured performance evidence. Its average benchmark score of 62498 places it at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 150HL has no benchmark scores in the database, so its 50th percentile placement cannot be tied to any measured workload. In nearest-rival comparisons, the AMD part sits 0.4% below the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX's 62738, 0.5% below the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185's 62839, 0.9% below the Intel Core i7-13790F's 63080, and 1.1% above the Intel Core i9-13900KF's 61841. That places the AMD part in a narrow band around 61841 to 63080 average score. The Intel part cannot be placed on that scale from benchmark data.

For any selection based on measured performance, the AMD part has the supporting evidence. The Intel part can only be selected on specification grounds: 14 cores, 24 MB shared L3 cache, DDR4 memory support, and an Intel Socket 1700 desktop platform. Those attributes are real, but they are not validated by any benchmark score in the database. The Intel part also has no nearest-rival entries, so no comparable score band exists for it.

Architecture Differences

The AMD processor uses Zen 5, with the generation label Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), codename Gorgon Point, built on a 4 nm TSMC process with a 233 mm² die. The Intel processor uses Raptor Lake, with the generation label Core 7 (Raptor Lake-PS), built on Intel's 10 nm process; no die size is recorded. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8 and is classified as a mobile part. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop part. Both are active production parts, both have locked multipliers, and both report ECC memory as unsupported.

Core counts differ. AMD has 10 cores and 20 threads; Intel has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz and boost is 5.00 GHz. The Intel base clock is 2.40 GHz and boost is also 5.00 GHz. TDP differs: 28 W for AMD, 45 W for Intel.

Cache layout differs. Both parts list 80 KB L1 per core. AMD has 1 MB L2 per core and 16 MB L3. Intel has 2 MB L2 per core and 24 MB shared L3. The Intel part therefore has the larger L2 per core and larger L3, while the AMD part has the same L1 per core and a smaller L3 total.

Memory support differs. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus; no bandwidth figure is recorded. Both use PCIe Gen 4, but AMD lists 16 CPU lanes and Intel lists 8 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon 890M, Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

Release timing differs. The AMD part has a release date of 2026-01-04; the Intel part has a release date of 2024-04-07. The AMD part number is 100-000001862; the Intel part number is recorded as unknown.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair. The head-to-head win count is 0 for both processors. The Intel Core 7 150HL has an empty benchmark list, so there are no Intel scores to compare against the AMD scores. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has the following recorded PassMark results: data compression 385174, data encryption 19308, extended instructions 26441, find prime numbers 126, floating point math 66824, integer math 107173, multithread 31485, physics 1747, random string sorting 40860, and single-thread 4168. The same 4168 single-thread score appears under two test labels in the database. These numbers establish the AMD part's measured workload profile, but they cannot be matched against the Intel part because the Intel part has no scores.

Without a direct head-to-head, the nearest-rival data provides context. The AMD part's average benchmark score is 62498. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX averages 62738, a 0.4% difference. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 averages 62839, a 0.5% difference. The Intel Core i7-13790F averages 63080, a 0.9% difference. The Intel Core i9-13900KF averages 61841, a 1.1% difference in the AMD part's favor. The AMD part therefore sits between the 61841 score and the 63080 score, within 1.1% of its nearest recorded rivals. No comparable positioning exists for the Intel part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has 10 cores. Both have 20 threads.

Q: Do the processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, but no bandwidth figure is recorded.

Q: What are the process nodes?

A: AMD uses a 4 nm TSMC process. Intel uses a 10 nm process.

Q: Why does the Intel part have an average benchmark score of 0?

A: The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Core 7 150HL. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile rank is 50. The AMD part has recorded benchmark entries and a 93rd percentile rank.

Q: How does the AMD part compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score is 62498. It sits 0.4% below the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX's 62738, 0.5% below the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185's 62839, 0.9% below the Intel Core i7-13790F's 63080, and 1.1% above the Intel Core i9-13900KF's 61841.

Q: Do the processors boost to the same clock?

A: Yes, both list a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Their base clocks differ: AMD is 2.00 GHz, Intel is 2.40 GHz.

Where Each One Wins

Based on standalone benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is the only source of measured workload results in this comparison. The Intel Core 7 150HL has no recorded benchmark scores, so it cannot claim any workload win in the database. AMD's recorded results include data compression 385174, data encryption 19308, extended instructions 26441, find prime numbers 126, floating point math 66824, integer math 107173, multithread 31485, physics 1747, random string sorting 40860, and single-thread 4168. These are the only benchmark results recorded for either processor.

On specification differences, the Intel part holds several structural advantages. It has 14 cores versus 10, a 2.40 GHz base clock versus 2.00 GHz, 2 MB L2 per core versus 1 MB, 24 MB shared L3 versus 16 MB, a 45 W TDP versus 28 W, DDR4 support, and a desktop Socket 1700 platform. Its release date of 2024-04-07 is earlier than the AMD part's 2026-01-04. The AMD part counters with a 4 nm process versus 10 nm, a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus none, 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 8, a Radeon 890M integrated GPU versus Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, and a mobile platform on AMD Socket FP8.

For use-case splits, the data supports a clear division. The AMD part is the only processor with measured performance, so any workload represented by the recorded PassMark tests falls to the AMD side. The Intel part offers specification-level attributes that matter for platform compatibility, particularly DDR4 support and a desktop socket, but those attributes are not accompanied by benchmark results in the database.