AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Core 5 130HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and Intel Core 5 130HL occupy different tiers in the database, and the recorded results reflect that gap clearly. The Intel part has no individual benchmark scores in the database, so the comparison relies on the AMD processor's measured performance across eleven PassMark workloads and the aggregate standings of both chips.

The Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 posts a multithread score of 31,485, a figure that places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 5 130HL, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero, indicating that no validated workload results are attached to it in the current records. The AMD processor's average benchmark score across all tests is 62,498, while the Intel chip's average is effectively unmeasured.

Looking at the AMD chip's individual results, the strongest area is data compression, where it records 385,174. That score is nearly double its integer math result of 107,173, showing that the compression workload leverages the processor's thread count effectively. The floating point math score of 66,824 and random string sorting score of 40,860 further support the idea that the 10-core, 20-thread configuration handles parallel throughput tasks well.

Single-thread performance is also solid. The PassMark single-thread score is 4,168, which is a competitive figure for a mobile processor in this generation. The extended instructions score of 26,441 and data encryption score of 19,308 round out the compute-focused results. The find prime numbers score of 126 is the lowest in the set, a typical outcome for that workload, which is heavily dependent on integer division and branch prediction rather than raw core count.

The nearest rivals for the AMD chip provide context for its standing. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX averages 62,738, which is 0.4% higher than the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 averages 62,839, a 0.5% advantage. The Intel Core i7-13790F averages 63,080, putting it 0.9% ahead. The only rival that the AMD chip beats is the Intel Core i9-13900KF, which averages 61,841, a 1.1% deficit relative to the Ryzen part. These deltas are small, indicating that the Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 sits in a tightly contested performance band.

The Intel Core 5 130HL has no nearest rivals listed in the database, which means there are no direct comparison points for its aggregate score. Its 50th percentile ranking suggests it is an average performer among all recorded CPUs, but without workload data, the database cannot confirm where it wins or loses in specific tests.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 compare to the Intel Core 5 130HL in overall benchmark standing?

A: The AMD chip sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs in the database with an average benchmark score of 62,498. The Intel chip sits in the 50th percentile with an average score of zero, meaning its aggregate performance is not established in the current records.

Q: What is the multithread score for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465?

A: The recorded PassMark multithread score is 31,485. This is one of the strongest results for the processor and supports its high percentile ranking.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 130HL have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel chip has no individual workload scores recorded, and its average benchmark score is zero. The database lists no nearest rivals for it either.

Q: Which workloads show the highest performance for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465?

A: The highest recorded score is data compression at 385,174. Other strong results include integer math at 107,173, floating point math at 66,824, and random string sorting at 40,860.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 perform against its closest rivals in the database?

A: It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX by 0.4%, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 by 0.5%, and the Intel Core i7-13790F by 0.9%. It leads the Intel Core i9-13900KF by 1.1%.

Q: What is the single-thread score for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465?

A: The PassMark single-thread score is 4,168, which appears twice in the database under slightly different test names but with the same value.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 wins in every measurable category because it is the only one of the two processors with recorded benchmark data. Its portfolio of scores shows strengths across multithreaded workloads, single-threaded tasks, and specialized instruction sets. The data compression score of 385,174 indicates that the chip is particularly well suited to workloads that involve large data sets and parallel processing. The integer math score of 107,173 and floating point math score of 66,824 point to strong general compute capability. The extended instructions score of 26,441 suggests the processor handles modern instruction set extensions efficiently.

The Intel Core 5 130HL cannot claim a win in any recorded workload because the database contains no scores for it. Its 50th percentile standing is based on aggregate data from other sources, but the absence of direct measurements means its performance profile is undefined in this database. The Intel chip does have a higher base clock of 2.60 GHz compared to the AMD chip's 2.00 GHz, and a higher TDP of 45 watts versus 28 watts, but clock speed and power draw do not translate into recorded performance wins without benchmark data.

For users relying on the database to choose between these two parts, the AMD chip has the only actionable performance numbers. The Intel chip's 12 cores and 16 threads suggest it has a different execution profile, but the lack of measurements prevents any quantitative comparison. The AMD chip's 10 cores and 20 threads deliver a multithread score of 31,485, which is the definitive result in this pairing.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 130HL has 12 cores and 16 threads. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The AMD chip has a higher boost ceiling, while the Intel chip has a higher base frequency.

Thermal design power also differs. The AMD part is rated at 28 watts, and the Intel part is rated at 45 watts. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses the Intel Socket 1700. The memory support differs as well: the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the AMD chip has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip has no bandwidth figure in the database.

Cache structures differ. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The integrated graphics differ: the AMD chip uses a Radeon 890M, and the Intel chip uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. PCIe support also differs, with the AMD chip offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel chip offering Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Neither chip supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is significant. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC. The die size is 233 mm². The Intel Core 5 130HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-PS, belonging to the Core 5 generation. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel. The Intel chip has no die size recorded in the database.

The AMD chip's architecture is newer, with a smaller process node and a hybrid core design that mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel chip's architecture is based on the older Raptor Lake design, which uses a larger 10 nm process. The AMD chip also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is a lower-power memory standard typically found in mobile devices. The Intel chip supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5, giving it broader compatibility with existing memory modules.

The AMD chip is classified as a mobile processor, while the Intel chip is classified as a desktop processor. This distinction aligns with the socket types: the AMD chip uses the FP8 socket, which is designed for mobile platforms, and the Intel chip uses Socket 1700, which is a desktop platform. The AMD chip's release date is recorded as January 4, 2026, while the Intel chip's release date is April 7, 2024. The production status for both is listed as active.