AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Arc G3

CORE STATE Panther Lake
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 14 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.9 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 18 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 25W
ARCHITECTURE Panther Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
385,174
N/A
passmark_data_encryption
19,308
N/A
passmark_extended_instructions
26,441
N/A
passmark_find_prime_numbers
126
N/A
passmark_floating_point_math
66,824
N/A
passmark_integer_math
107,173
N/A
passmark_multithread
31,485
N/A
passmark_physics
1,747
N/A
passmark_random_string_sorting
40,860
N/A
passmark_single_thread
4,168
N/A
passmark_singlethread
4,168
N/A

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 vs Intel Arc G3

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently holds no head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 versus the Intel Arc G3. This means there are no direct comparison scores recorded for these two processors in the same test suite. The Intel Arc G3 has an empty benchmark array, yielding an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465, by contrast, has eleven recorded PassMark tests and an average benchmark score of 62,498, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

Without direct head-to-head results, the nearest rivals of the AMD part provide context for interpreting its performance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 sits within a tight cluster: it trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX by 0.4 percent (average score 62,738), trails the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 by 0.5 percent (62,839), and trails the Intel Core i7-13790F by 0.9 percent (63,080). It leads the Intel Core i9-13900KF by 1.1 percent (61,841). These deltas are small, indicating the AMD processor is competitive with several high-end desktop and mobile parts from the prior generation.

The strongest recorded scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 appear in specific workloads. Its PassMark data compression score reaches 385,174, a figure that far exceeds its other results on a per-test basis. Floating point math scores 66,824, integer math scores 107,173, and random string sorting scores 40,860. Single-thread performance is recorded at 4,168 in both the single_thread and singlethread entries, which are duplicates. Multi-thread performance scores 31,485, while extended instructions score 26,441. Data encryption scores 19,308, physics scores 1,747, and find prime numbers scores 126.

Since the Intel Arc G3 has no recorded scores, no direct wins can be assigned to either part. The winsA and winsB fields are both zero. The database shows a complete absence of comparative data, so any assessment of relative strengths must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than measured outcomes.

Where Each One Wins

Benchmark results indicate the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 delivers strong throughput in compute-heavy tasks. Its integer math score of 107,173 and floating point math score of 66,824 suggest solid arithmetic capability for both general-purpose and scientific workloads. Data compression at 385,174 points is particularly notable, indicating efficient handling of compression algorithms. Multi-thread performance at 31,485 points shows scalable parallel execution across its 20 threads. Single-thread performance at 4,168 points provides a baseline for latency-sensitive applications.

The Intel Arc G3 has no recorded benchmark wins in the database. Its percentile rank of 50 reflects the absence of data, not a measured performance level. With zero scores across all test categories, the database cannot attribute any workload advantage to this processor. The Arc G3 does have architectural features that differ from the AMD part, but without measurements, those features cannot be translated into performance claims.

For the AMD processor, the data supports strengths in data-intensive tasks such as compression and encryption, given the high compression score and the encryption score of 19,308. The extended instructions score of 26,441 indicates proficiency with SIMD and specialized instruction sets. Physics score of 1,747 is modest compared to other results, suggesting less dominance in physics simulation workloads. Find prime numbers at 126 is a low absolute score, typical for this type of test, but it is the weakest relative showing among the AMD results.

The Intel Arc G3, based on its specifications, uses a different core configuration: 14 cores and 14 threads, meaning no hyper-threading. The AMD part uses 10 cores and 20 threads, enabling simultaneous multi-threading. The Arc G3 has a higher memory bandwidth at 136.5 GB/s compared to 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part. It also uses faster PCIe Gen 5 with 4 lanes, whereas the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes. These differences could matter for memory-bound and I/O-bound workloads, but the absence of benchmark scores prevents any quantitative conclusion.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear asymmetry: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has a full suite of benchmark results, while the Intel Arc G3 has none. Anyone selecting between these two processors based on the recorded data would find only one side with measurable evidence. The AMD part demonstrates competitive standing against its nearest rivals, all within a 0.9 percent margin on either side of its average score. Its 93rd percentile ranking places it above the vast majority of CPUs in the database.

For the Intel Arc G3, the database provides no performance evidence. Its 50th percentile rank is a placeholder for missing data, not a measured outcome. The processor is listed as active with a 2026 release date, but until benchmark results are recorded, no performance-based verdict can be reached. The AMD processor, with its 2026 release date as well, has already accumulated substantial data.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 is the only part with verified scores, so the verdict from the database is straightforward: it is the one with demonstrated performance. The Intel Arc G3 cannot be recommended or dismissed on measured grounds; it simply lacks the data. For workloads like compression, integer math, and multi-threaded tasks, the AMD part shows specific strengths. For any task, the Intel part shows nothing recorded.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465?

A: The average benchmark score is 62,498, based on eleven recorded PassMark tests.

Q: Does the Intel Arc G3 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the Intel Arc G3 has an empty benchmark array, resulting in an average score of 0 and a 50th percentile rank.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 compare to the Intel Core i9-13900KF?

A: The AMD processor leads the Intel Core i9-13900KF by 1.1 percent in average benchmark score (62,498 versus 61,841).

Q: What is the single-thread score for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465?

A: The single-thread score is 4,168, recorded in both the single_thread and singlethread test entries.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 14 cores and 14 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two processors?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 136.5 GB/s memory bandwidth, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has 89.6 GB/s.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake codename and is built on a 3 nm process at Intel, with no die size recorded. The AMD part has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel part has 14 cores and 14 threads, indicating that the Intel design does not support simultaneous multi-threading.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. The Intel processor has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3. The larger per-core L1 and L2 on the Intel part could benefit certain workloads, though the AMD part has more threads for parallel tasks.

Memory support also differs: the AMD part supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports only LPDDR5X. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the Intel part has higher memory bandwidth at 136.5 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. PCIe connectivity differs as well: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 4 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part has newer PCIe generation but fewer lanes.

Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses the Radeon 890M, while the Intel part uses the Arc B370. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers. The production status for both is active, with release dates in 2026: the AMD part on January 4, 2026, and the Intel part on May 27, 2026.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Arc G3 uses Intel BGA 2540. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel part has a base clock of 1.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Thermal design power differs slightly: 28 W for the AMD part and 25 W for the Intel part.

Core and thread counts differ as noted: 10 cores and 20 threads for AMD, 14 cores and 14 threads for Intel. The process node differs: 4 nm for AMD at TSMC, 3 nm for Intel at its own foundry. The AMD die size is 233 mm², while no die size is recorded for Intel. Cache sizes differ in every level: L1 is 80 KB versus 192 KB per core, L2 is 1 MB versus 2.5 MB per core, and L3 is 16 MB versus 18 MB.

Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports only LPDDR5X. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 136.5 GB/s for Intel. PCIe generation and lane count differ: Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD, Gen 5 with 4 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 890M versus Arc B370. Part numbers differ: 100-000001862 for AMD, SA4QZ for Intel. Neither has a launch MSRP listed, and both are mobile market segments with active production status.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 PRO 465
G3
Core Specs
Cores
10
14 +40.0%
Threads
20
14 -30.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
1.9 -5.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
4.6 -8.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
1.9 -5.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
4.6 -8.0%
Multiplier
20
19 -5.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
18 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
25 -10.7%
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
15-45 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Codename
Gorgon Point
Panther Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Arc G3 (Panther Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
136.5 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel BGA 2540
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 4 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 6
P-Cores: 2 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
1500 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
LP E-Cores
4
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
Yes / 46 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 890M
Arc B370
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001862
SA4QZ
Package
FP8
FC-BGA
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 Details View Arc G3 Details