AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 vs Intel Core 9 270H Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 and the Intel Core 9 270H are closely matched mobile processors, with the data showing a near-total dead heat in average benchmark scores. The AMD part posts an average score of 42878, while the Intel part trails by a mere 0.1% at 42816. This places both in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, and both are within 0.2% of the Intel Core i9-12900K and AMD Ryzen 9 3900X. Given this parity, the verdict is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is the pick for users prioritizing multi-threaded throughput, data compression, and extended instruction set performance, as it wins 11 of 17 head-to-head tests. Conversely, the Intel Core 9 270H is the choice for those needing raw single-thread speed, floating-point math, and encryption throughput, winning 6 of 17 tests, including a decisive 10.3% lead in Passmark single-thread scoring. The data shows no universal winner; the decision hinges on the specific workload profile.

The Verdict

From the benchmark data alone, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is the superior choice for general productivity and multi-core rendering. It leads in all six Cinebench tests, from the R15 multicore score of 2714 versus 2707 to the R23 multicore score of 26935 versus 26861, with a consistent 0.3% advantage. This makes it the safer recommendation for users running video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, where its 12 cores and 24 threads provide a slight but uniform edge. The AMD part also dominates in Passmark extended instructions, scoring 26014 against Intel’s 21785, a massive 19.4% lead that indicates superior performance in specialized workloads like cryptography and SIMD-heavy code.

The Intel Core 9 270H, however, is the clear winner for users who value snappy single-threaded response and specific math-heavy tasks. Its Passmark single-thread score of 4404 is 10.3% higher than AMD’s 3952, a substantial gap that will translate to faster application launch times and better performance in lightly-threaded games. Intel also wins decisively in floating-point math, scoring 80299 versus 68920, a 14.2% margin, and in data encryption, with 21223 versus 19381, an 8.7% edge. For users whose primary tasks are spreadsheet calculations, financial modeling, or encryption, the Intel part is the data-backed choice.

The data suggests no compromise: the AMD part is for throughput, the Intel part is for latency-sensitive and single-threaded tasks. The average benchmark scores are so close that neither part offers a meaningful overall advantage; the deltaPct between them is only 0.1%, making the workload-specific wins the only rational basis for selection.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 uses the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Point, fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 9 270H uses the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-H, on Intel’s 10 nm process. This process difference is reflected in the power envelope: AMD’s TDP is 28 watts, while Intel’s is 45 watts, indicating higher peak power draw for the Intel part.

The core configurations differ significantly. The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part has 14 cores but only 20 threads, reflecting Intel’s hybrid architecture of performance and efficiency cores. Cache hierarchies also diverge: both share 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core on the AMD side, but Intel doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is notably different, with AMD providing 16 MB and Intel providing 24 MB shared. Memory support differs as well, with AMD supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD supports ECC memory, while Intel does not.

The integrated graphics are distinct: AMD pairs the CPU with a Radeon 890M, while Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics with 96 execution units. PCIe capabilities also differ, with AMD offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes and Intel offering Gen 5 with 8 lanes. The AMD die size is listed at 233 mm², while Intel’s is not specified. The release dates are close, with Intel launching on 2024-12-17 and AMD on 2025-01-05.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has an average benchmark score of 42878, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core 9 270H’s score of 42816.

Q: Does the Intel Core 9 270H have more cores than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370?

A: Yes, the Intel part has 14 cores, while the AMD part has 12 cores. However, the AMD part has more threads, with 24 threads versus Intel’s 20 threads.

Q: Which processor wins in data encryption benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core 9 270H wins the Passmark data encryption test with a score of 21223, which is 8.7% higher than AMD’s score of 19381.

Q: What is the L3 cache size difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core 9 270H has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock speed?

A: The Intel Core 9 270H has a boost clock of 5.80 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: Are both processors in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 and the Intel Core 9 270H are in the 91st percentile of all CPUs.

Specification Differences

The specifications where the two processors differ are numerous. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 9 270H has 14 cores and 20 threads. The base clock is 2000 MHz for AMD and 2700 MHz for Intel, with boost clocks of 5.10 GHz and 5.80 GHz respectively. The TDP is 28 watts for AMD and 45 watts for Intel. The sockets are different: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel BGA 1744. The architecture is Zen 5 for AMD and Raptor Lake for Intel. The process node is 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel, while the L3 cache is 16 MB for AMD and 24 MB for Intel. Memory support differs, with AMD supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, and Intel supporting DDR4 and DDR5. ECC memory is supported by AMD but not by Intel. PCIe lanes are Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD and Gen 5 with 8 lanes for Intel. The integrated graphics are Radeon 890M for AMD and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU for Intel. The release dates are 2025-01-05 for AMD and 2024-12-17 for Intel. Intel has a launch MSRP of $697, while AMD has no listed launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results show a clear split in workload dominance. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 wins every Cinebench test, though by a narrow margin. In Cinebench R15 multicore, AMD scores 2714 against Intel’s 2707, a 0.3% lead. The single-core R15 test shows a similar 0.3% edge, with scores of 383 and 382. The R20 tests follow the same pattern: AMD wins multicore 11312 to 11281 and single-core 1596 to 1592, both with 0.3% deltas. The R23 tests continue this trend, with AMD scoring 26935 versus 26861 in multicore and 3802 versus 3792 in single-core.

The Passmark suite reveals more dramatic swings. AMD’s biggest win is in extended instructions, where it scores 26014 against Intel’s 21785, a 19.4% margin. AMD also wins find prime numbers by 10.4%, scoring 127 versus 115, and integer math by 2.8%, with 113247 versus 110195. Data compression goes to AMD with 372313 versus 364399, a 2.2% lead, and random string sorting is a narrow AMD win at 41043 versus 40885, a 0.4% margin.

Intel’s wins are equally pronounced. The single-thread test is Intel’s largest victory, with a score of 4404 versus 3952, a 10.3% lead. Floating-point math shows Intel ahead by 14.2%, scoring 80299 versus 68920. Data encryption is an 8.7% Intel win, with 21223 versus 19381. Physics tests favor Intel with 1946 versus 1811, a 6.9% margin, and the multithread test is a narrow Intel win at 31602 versus 31425, a 0.6% edge.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is the winner in multi-core rendering and productivity tasks. It wins all six Cinebench tests, indicating a consistent advantage in CPU-bound rendering workloads. The 19.4% lead in extended instructions makes it the clear choice for developers and researchers using SIMD-heavy code, cryptography, or other specialized instruction sets. Its wins in data compression and integer math also suggest it is better suited for file archiving and general office productivity. The 2.2% lead in data compression and 2.8% lead in integer math, while smaller, reinforce AMD’s edge in everyday computing tasks.

The Intel Core 9 270H is the winner for single-threaded performance and math-heavy workloads. The 10.3% lead in Passmark single-thread is the largest single performance gap in the entire comparison, making it the obvious choice for users who prioritize application responsiveness and lightly-threaded gaming. The 14.2% lead in floating-point math makes it superior for scientific computing, 3D modeling, and financial simulations. The 8.7% lead in data encryption makes it the better option for security-focused workloads, while the 6.9% win in physics and 0.6% win in multithread suggest it holds an edge in certain simulation tasks.