AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14700F

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 20 Cores / 28 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
3,540
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
499
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
14,751
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
2,082
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
35,122
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
4,958
geekbench_multicore
N/A
19,620
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,429
passmark_data_compression
N/A
505,885
passmark_data_encryption
N/A
30,144
passmark_extended_instructions
N/A
28,564
passmark_find_prime_numbers
N/A
176
passmark_floating_point_math
N/A
107,005
passmark_integer_math
N/A
155,808
passmark_multithread
N/A
41,317
passmark_physics
N/A
2,455
passmark_random_string_sorting
N/A
55,918
passmark_single_thread
N/A
4,257
passmark_singlethread
N/A
4,257

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 vs Intel Core i7-14700F

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains benchmark results for the Intel Core i7-14700F, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has no individual benchmark scores listed in the database. Consequently, a direct numerical comparison between the two processors cannot be constructed from the available measurements. The Intel Core i7-14700F, however, has a substantial set of recorded scores across multiple test suites, and its aggregate performance can be evaluated against its nearest rivals in the database.

The Intel Core i7-14700F achieves an average benchmark score of 53,620, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. This percentile rank indicates that the processor outperforms approximately 91% of all recorded CPUs, a strong position for a desktop part. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon 6505P with an average score of 53,701, the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 53,469, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53,288, and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53,206. The Intel Core i7-14700F trails the Intel Xeon 6505P by only 0.2%, while it leads the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6%, and the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.8%. These delta percentages are narrow, indicating that the Intel Core i7-14700F sits in a tightly contested performance band among high-end desktop and server-class processors.

In multi-core rendering workloads, the Intel Core i7-14700F records a Cinebench R15 multicore score of 3,540, a Cinebench R20 multicore score of 14,751, and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 35,122. The progression across these three Cinebench versions reflects the expected scaling of the workload; the R23 score in particular confirms strong multi-threaded throughput. Single-core results for the same suite are 499 in Cinebench R15, 2,082 in Cinebench R20, and 4,958 in Cinebench R23. The single-core performance is consistent and competitive, with the R23 single-core figure approaching the 5,000-point mark.

Geekbench results for the Intel Core i7-14700F show a multi-core score of 19,620 and a single-core score of 2,429. These figures reinforce the pattern established by the Cinebench results: the processor delivers solid single-thread performance while its multi-thread score benefits from the high core and thread counts.

PassMark results for the Intel Core i7-14700F cover a range of specialized workloads. The processor scores 505,885 in data compression, 30,144 in data encryption, 28,564 in extended instructions, 176 in finding prime numbers, 107,005 in floating point math, 155,808 in integer math, 41,317 in multithread, 2,455 in physics, 55,918 in random string sorting, and 4,257 in both single-thread and singlethread tests. The data compression score of 505,885 is particularly notable, as it exceeds the half-million mark and indicates strong performance in workloads that rely on compression algorithms. The integer math score of 155,808 is also a high figure, while the prime number finding score of 176 is comparatively low, reflecting the nature of that workload which often depends on specific instruction throughput.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its percentile rank of 50 is listed, but this is not accompanied by any actual test results. The absence of benchmark data for the AMD part means that no head-to-head wins can be attributed to either processor. The wins count for both items stands at 0 in the database. The Intel Core i7-14700F can be characterized only through its own scores and its relative position among its nearest rivals, not through direct comparison with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475.

Where Each One Wins

For the Intel Core i7-14700F, the recorded benchmark results indicate strengths in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122, the Geekbench multi-core score of 19,620, and the PassMark multithread score of 41,317 all point to high throughput in parallel tasks. The 20 cores and 28 threads provide the hardware foundation for these results. The processor also shows strong single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,429 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958, meaning it is not reliant solely on core count.

Specialized PassMark tests reveal specific strengths. The data compression score of 505,885 indicates that the Intel Core i7-14700F handles compression workloads efficiently. The integer math score of 155,808 and floating point math score of 107,005 show capability in both integer and floating-point arithmetic. The extended instructions score of 28,564 suggests that SIMD and other extended instruction set workloads are handled competently. The random string sorting score of 55,918 reflects strong memory and cache performance under sorting workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has no recorded wins in the database because no benchmark scores are available for it. The database lists its percentile rank as 50, but without actual scores, no workload-specific strengths can be identified from the measurements. The processor's hardware configuration includes 12 cores and 24 threads, a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and an L3 cache of 16 MB, but these specifications do not translate into recorded benchmark outcomes in the current data. The wins field for the AMD part is 0, and the head-to-head benchmark array is empty.

The Intel Core i7-14700F also records wins in the aggregate. Its average benchmark score of 53,620 places it above three of its four nearest rivals in the database. It beats the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6%, and the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.8%. Only the Intel Xeon 6505P exceeds it, and by a margin of just 0.2%. These margins demonstrate that the Intel Core i7-14700F is competitive with server-class Xeon and EPYC processors despite being a desktop part.

The use-case split is therefore heavily one-sided in the recorded data. The Intel Core i7-14700F wins in every category where benchmarks exist, from multi-core rendering to single-thread tasks to specialized PassMark workloads. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 cannot be assigned any wins because the database contains no measurements for it. The data shows a desktop processor with a complete benchmark profile against a mobile processor with no recorded test results.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation that incorporates both Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC and has a die size of 233 mm². The processor features 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Its thermal design power is 28 watts, reflecting its mobile market segment.

The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core i7 generation within the Raptor Lake Refresh lineup. It is built on a 10 nm process node by Intel and has a die size of 257 mm². The processor features 20 cores and 28 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its thermal design power is 65 watts, consistent with its desktop market segment.

Cache organization differs between the two processors. Both have an L1 cache of 80 KB per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is 16 MB for the AMD part, whereas the Intel part has 33 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel processor therefore has twice the per-core L2 capacity and more than double the total L3 cache.

Memory support also differs. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i7-14700F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. ECC memory support is present on the Intel part but not on the AMD part.

PCI Express capabilities differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core i7-14700F provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part's newer PCIe generation offers higher potential bandwidth for compatible devices, though the database does not record specific throughput figures for either part.

Integrated graphics also separate the two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 includes a Radeon 890M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i7-14700F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. This difference is significant for systems that rely on the processor's built-in display output, though the database records no graphics benchmark scores for either part. The production status for both processors is listed as Active, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. The base clock is 2.00 GHz for the AMD part and 2.10 GHz for the Intel part. The boost clock is 5.20 GHz for the AMD part and 5.40 GHz for the Intel part. The thermal design power is 28 watts for the AMD part and 65 watts for the Intel part.

The socket and market segment differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 uses AMD Socket FP8 and targets the mobile segment. The Intel Core i7-14700F uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop segment. The process node is 4 nm for the AMD part and 10 nm for the Intel part, with the foundry being TSMC for AMD and Intel for the Intel part. The die size is 233 mm² for the AMD part and 257 mm² for the Intel part.

Cache specifications differ in L2 and L3. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has 1 MB L2 per core and 16 MB L3. The Intel Core i7-14700F has 2 MB L2 per core and 33 MB L3 shared. L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core for both.

Memory support differs. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while no bandwidth is recorded for the Intel part. ECC memory is supported by the Intel part but not by the AMD part.

PCIe support differs by generation. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are present on the AMD part as Radeon 890M, while the Intel part has none. The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i7-14700F is $359; the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has no launch MSRP recorded. The release date for the AMD part is recorded as 2025-12-31, while the Intel part was released on 2024-01-07. The part numbers are 100-000001859 for the AMD part and SRN3Z for the Intel part.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 and the Intel Core i7-14700F?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How does the thermal design power differ between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has a thermal design power of 28 watts. The Intel Core i7-14700F has a thermal design power of 65 watts.

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475. Its percentile rank is listed as 50, but no individual test results are recorded.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700F compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53,620. It trails the Intel Xeon 6505P by 0.2%, leads the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3%, leads the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6%, and leads the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.8%.

Q: What is the L3 cache capacity for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core i7-14700F has 33 MB of shared L3 cache.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 HX 475
i7-14700F
Core Specs
Cores
12
20 +66.7%
Threads
24
28 +16.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.1 +5.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.4 +3.8%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.1 +5.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5.4 +3.8%
Multiplier
20
21 +5.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
65 +132.1%
PL1
—
65 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 8
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
1500 MHz up to 4.2 GHz
P-Core Turbo
—
5.3 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 60 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 890M
—
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$359
Part Number
100-000001859
SRN3Z
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
—
Laminar RM1
View Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 Details View Core i7-14700F Details