AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a full benchmark suite for the Intel Core i7-14650HX, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has no recorded benchmark scores in the current dataset. This asymmetry shapes the comparison: all quantitative performance data comes from the Intel side, and the AMD processor can only be evaluated through its architectural specifications and general market positioning.

The Intel Core i7-14650HX posts a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 20,454 points and a single-core score of 1,969 points. In Cinebench R20, it records 11,946 multi-core and 1,686 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test shows 3,470.5 multi-core and 285.5 single-core. These results place the Intel chip at the 88th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 41,576.

Geekbench results for the Intel processor show 14,249 multi-core and 2,173 single-core. The PassMark suite provides a broader view: multi-thread performance scores 33,495, single-thread scores 3,841, integer math scores 116,661, floating point math scores 84,999, and extended instructions score 24,150. Data compression reaches 398,418, data encryption reaches 22,917, and random string sorting scores 43,035. Physics computation scores 2,202, and prime number finding scores 152.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 lacks any recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head analysis relies on the Intel processor's rivals instead. The nearest rivals to the Intel Core i7-14650HX are the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H with an average score of 41,621, the Intel Core 7 251TE with 41,650, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with 41,376, and the Intel Core i7-12850HX with 41,779. The delta percentages are minimal: 0.1 percent behind the Core Ultra 7 265H, 0.2 percent behind the Core 7 251TE, 0.5 percent ahead of the Ryzen 9 5900X, and 0.5 percent behind the Core i7-12850HX.

The data indicates the Intel Core i7-14650HX sits in a tightly packed performance cluster. Its average score of 41,576 is within half a percent of all four nearest rivals, meaning the recorded differences are small enough that workload-specific behavior, thermal headroom, and platform characteristics would likely determine the practical winner in any given task. The 0.5 percent lead over the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is particularly notable because that desktop-class processor historically anchors a much higher power envelope.

Where Each One Wins

For the Intel Core i7-14650HX, the benchmark distribution shows clear strengths. In multi-threaded workloads, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,454 and PassMark multi-thread score of 33,495 indicate robust parallel processing capability. The integer math score of 116,661 and floating point math score of 84,999 suggest strong general computation throughput. Data compression at 398,418 and random string sorting at 43,035 point to solid memory subsystem performance. The single-thread score of 3,841 in PassMark and 1,969 in Cinebench R23 show competitive single-core performance as well.

The Intel processor also shows a specific strength in extended instructions with a score of 24,150, which covers workloads using newer CPU instruction sets. Data encryption at 22,917 and physics at 2,202 round out the picture of a balanced mobile processor.

For the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, no benchmark wins can be claimed from the recorded data. Its case must be built on specifications alone. The processor uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process node with a 233 mm² die size. It has 12 cores and 24 threads, a base clock of 2.00 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The 28 W TDP suggests a power-efficient design, though the database does not provide direct performance measurements to confirm how that efficiency translates into real-world speed.

The AMD chip includes a Radeon 890M integrated GPU, which indicates stronger graphics capability than the Intel UHD Graphics 710 found in the Core i7-14650HX, but the database records no graphics benchmarks for either processor.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 uses the Zen 5 architecture within the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Intel Core i7-14650HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture within the Raptor Lake-HX codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series and specifically the Core i7 Raptor Lake-HX Refresh generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The cache hierarchy consists of 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 30 MB of shared L3 cache.

Core counts differ: the AMD processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor has 16 cores and 24 threads. Both share the same 24-thread count, but the Intel chip achieves it with more physical cores. The AMD boost clock matches the Intel boost clock at 5.20 GHz, while the base clocks differ at 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.20 GHz for Intel.

The TDP values show a substantial difference: the AMD processor is rated at 28 W, the Intel processor at 55 W. This nearly 2x gap in thermal design power suggests different intended use cases, with the AMD chip oriented toward thinner, more power-conscious laptops and the Intel chip toward larger gaming or workstation laptops that can sustain higher power draw.

Memory support also differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with no recorded bandwidth figure. The Intel chip supports ECC memory, while the AMD chip does not.

PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. This gives the Intel platform a potential bandwidth advantage for future storage and GPU connectivity, though the database does not include measured PCIe performance.

The Intel processor has an unlocked multiplier, while the AMD processor does not. The integrated graphics differ as well: Radeon 890M on the AMD side versus UHD Graphics 710 on the Intel side.

The Intel processor's production status is Active, as is the AMD processor's. The AMD release date is recorded as 2025-12-31, while the Intel release date is 2024-01-07. The Intel part number is SRMXH, and the AMD part number is 100-000001859.

The Verdict

The database contains a full set of benchmarks for the Intel Core i7-14650HX and none for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475. This means any direct performance comparison is impossible from recorded measurements alone. The Intel processor's 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average score of 41,576, places it in the upper tier of mobile processors.

The Intel Core i7-14650HX delivers strong multi-threaded performance with its 16 cores and 24 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,454 and PassMark multi-thread score of 33,495 confirm this. Its single-thread performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,969. The processor sits within 0.5 percent of four nearest rivals, indicating that it competes at parity with the Core Ultra 7 265H, Core 7 251TE, Ryzen 9 5900X, and Core i7-12850HX.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 offers a different value proposition based on specifications. Its 28 W TDP is dramatically lower than the Intel chip's 55 W TDP, which suggests longer battery life and thinner laptop designs. The 4 nm TSMC process node and Zen 5 architecture represent a newer manufacturing generation compared to Intel's 10 nm Raptor Lake design. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration with a 5.20 GHz boost clock matches the Intel chip's boost speed while drawing less power.

Users who need raw multi-threaded throughput and have recorded benchmarks to back the decision should choose the Intel Core i7-14650HX. The data shows a proven performer with a complete benchmark suite. Users who prioritize power efficiency, newer manufacturing technology, and a more capable integrated GPU should examine the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, though they must accept that no recorded performance data exists yet to validate its real-world speed.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core i7-14650HX?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX has an average benchmark score of 41,576 and sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database contains no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, which means its performance cannot be quantitatively compared to the Intel processor from recorded measurements.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14650HX compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It is 0.1 percent behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H, 0.2 percent behind the Intel Core 7 251TE, 0.5 percent ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, and 0.5 percent behind the Intel Core i7-12850HX.

Q: What are the core counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14650HX has 16 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has a TDP of 28 W, and the Intel Core i7-14650HX has a TDP of 55 W.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 does not.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 and the Intel Core i7-14650HX:

• Series: The AMD processor has no recorded series, while the Intel processor belongs to the Core 14th Gen series.
• Cores: 12 for AMD, 16 for Intel.
• Base clock: 2.00 GHz for AMD, 2.20 GHz for Intel.
• TDP: 28 W for AMD, 55 W for Intel.
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8 for AMD, Intel BGA 1964 for Intel.
• Architecture: Zen 5 for AMD, Raptor Lake for Intel.
• Codename: Gorgon Point for AMD, Raptor Lake-HX for Intel.
• Generation: Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) for AMD, Core i7 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) for Intel.
• Process node: 4 nm for AMD, 10 nm for Intel.
• Foundry: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel.
• Die size: 233 mm² for AMD, 257 mm² for Intel.
• L2 cache: 1 MB per core for AMD, 2 MB per core for Intel.
• L3 cache: 16 MB for AMD, 30 MB (shared) for Intel.
• Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X for AMD; DDR4, DDR5 for Intel.
• Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s for AMD, not recorded for Intel.
• ECC memory: False for AMD, true for Intel.
• PCIe: Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) for AMD; Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) for Intel.
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 890M for AMD, UHD Graphics 710 for Intel.
• Release date: 2025-12-31 for AMD, 2024-01-07 for Intel.
• Multiplier unlocked: False for AMD, true for Intel.
• Part number: 100-000001859 for AMD, SRMXH for Intel.