AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 vs Intel Core i5-14400 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 vs Intel Core i5-14400

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 and the Intel Core i5-14400, so this comparison relies on the recorded scores for the Intel part and the absence of measured results for the AMD part. The Intel Core i5-14400 has a full set of benchmark data, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has no recorded scores in the database. This makes a direct numerical comparison impossible for most workloads.

What can be stated from the recorded data is the Intel Core i5-14400's performance profile. In Cinebench R23, it scores 21315 points in the multi-core test and 3009 points in the single-core test. In Cinebench R20, the scores are 8952 multi-core and 1263 single-core. The older Cinebench R15 results show 2148 multi-core and 303 single-core. Geekbench results show 9807 for multi-core and 1905 for single-core.

The PassMark suite provides additional detail for the Intel part. The multi-thread score is 25080, and the single-thread score is 3741. Integer math scores 82017, floating-point math scores 61549, and extended instructions score 19816. Data compression scores 314995, data encryption scores 16731, and random string sorting scores 32346. Physics scores 1396, and the prime number finding test scores 80.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison cannot produce win counts. The database shows zero wins for each side. Any statement about which processor is faster in a specific workload cannot be supported by the recorded data. The Intel part's average benchmark score is 32115, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 0 and sits at the 50th percentile, a position that reflects the absence of measurements rather than actual performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and target different market segments. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 is a mobile processor built on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Gorgon Point, from the Ryzen AI 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14400 is a desktop processor using the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, from the Core 14th generation. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel with a die size of 215 mm².

Core counts differ significantly. The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part has 10 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD processor and 2.50 GHz for the Intel processor. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz for the AMD part and 4.70 GHz for the Intel part. The AMD processor has a thermal design power of 28 watts, while the Intel processor is rated at 65 watts.

Cache layouts differ in the L2 and L3 portions. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel processor a larger total cache pool, while the AMD processor's per-core L2 allocation is smaller.

Memory support shows a split. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. The AMD part does not support ECC memory, while the Intel part does.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Both have integrated graphics: the AMD part uses Radeon 890M, and the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded data, only the Intel Core i5-14400 has measurable wins, since the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has no benchmark scores. The Intel part demonstrates a balanced profile across synthetic workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21315 indicates strong sustained multi-threaded performance, which suits rendering and compilation tasks. The single-core score of 3009 in the same test shows capable single-threaded responsiveness.

The PassMark results for the Intel part reveal specific strengths. Integer math at 82017 and floating-point math at 61549 suggest solid general-purpose compute. The data compression score of 314995 is notably high, which points to strong performance in archiving and compression workloads. Data encryption at 16731 indicates moderate throughput for encryption tasks. The extended instructions score of 19816 shows support for modern instruction sets.

The Intel processor's percentile placement reinforces its position. At the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, it sits above most processors in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12800H with an average score of 32121 and a delta of 0 percent, the Intel Core i7-13705H with an average score of 32076 and a delta of 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i5-14450HX with an average score of 32040 and a delta of 0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i9-11900 with an average score of 32226 and a delta of -0.3 percent. This cluster shows the i5-14400 performing within a narrow band of comparable processors.

For the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, the architecture suggests different priorities. Its 12 cores and 24 threads exceed the Intel part's thread count, and its 5.20 GHz boost clock is higher. The 28-watt TDP indicates a power-efficient design aimed at mobile systems. The Zen 5 architecture with mixed Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores likely balances performance and efficiency, but no benchmark data confirms this.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion for the Intel Core i5-14400: it is a measured, competitive desktop processor. Its average benchmark score of 32115 and 82nd percentile ranking place it in the upper tier of the database. The full suite of benchmark results gives it a documented performance profile that spans rendering, single-threaded tasks, and compute workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 cannot be assessed from performance data. With no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals listed, the database provides no evidence of its speed in any workload. Its specifications indicate a different design philosophy: more cores, a higher boost clock, lower power draw, and a mobile socket. These traits suggest it targets thin-and-light laptops where efficiency matters more than raw throughput. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration and 5.20 GHz boost could deliver strong multi-threaded performance, but that remains unverified.

A builder choosing between these parts must consider the platform difference first. The Intel Core i5-14400 is a desktop processor for Socket 1700, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 is a mobile processor for Socket FP8. They do not serve the same system type. The Intel part has recorded results and a known performance level. The AMD part offers a newer process node, a higher boost clock, and more threads, but no measured performance exists in the database. For a desktop build where performance numbers matter, the Intel part is the only one with data to support a decision. For a mobile system, the AMD part is the only option, but its performance must be taken on specification alone.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-14400 has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 boosts to 5.20 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14400 boosts to 4.70 GHz.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14400?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 has an average benchmark score of 32115 and sits at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database shows no benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core i5-14400 supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400 supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 does not.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 | Intel Core i5-14400 |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Series | None | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 12 | 10 |

| Threads | 24 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | None recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | None | $221 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001859 | SRN3QSRN46 |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 50 | 82 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 32115 |