AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 vs Intel Core 5 320 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 and Intel Core 5 320 occupy different positions in the mobile processor landscape. The database shows the AMD part with 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part offers 6 cores and 6 threads. That core and thread disparity shapes every benchmark result. The AMD chip targets users who need sustained multi-threaded throughput, while the Intel chip delivers a more modest, power-conscious design. There are no shared benchmark entries between the two processors in the recorded data, so direct score comparisons rely on the available Intel results and the architectural specifications of each part. The Intel Core 5 320 has a recorded average benchmark score of 18023, ranking in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 carries a 50th percentile ranking with no average score listed. The verdict is straightforward: the AMD processor is the choice for heavy parallel workloads, and the Intel processor suits lighter, single-thread-oriented tasks in a lower power envelope.

The Verdict

The data indicates two distinct buyer profiles. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, with 12 cores, 24 threads, a 5.20 GHz boost clock, and a 28 W TDP, is the stronger candidate for rendering, compiling, and other fully threaded applications. Its Zen 5 architecture and 16 MB of L3 cache provide the structural basis for high multi-core throughput. The Intel Core 5 320, by contrast, uses 6 cores and 6 threads, boosts to 4.60 GHz, and draws only 15 W. Its recorded benchmark scores, such as 6197 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1926 in single-core, place it in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. The AMD part lacks recorded benchmarks in this database, so its exact performance numbers are absent, but its thread count and cache configuration suggest it will outperform the Intel chip in parallel tasks. The Intel chip is the better fit for fanless or ultra-portable designs where the 15 W TDP and single-channel memory bus keep power and complexity low. The AMD chip demands more power and a dual-channel memory interface but offers twice the threads. From the data, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 is the pick for creators and developers, while the Intel Core 5 320 suits everyday productivity and battery-conscious users.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 boosts up to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 320 boosts up to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has a TDP of 28 W, and the Intel Core 5 320 has a TDP of 15 W.

Q: What is the Intel Core 5 320's Cinebench R23 multi-core score?

A: The Intel Core 5 320 records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 6197 and a single-core score of 1926.

Q: What memory bus width does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 uses a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 5 320 uses a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the Intel Core 5 320 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core 5 320 has an average benchmark score of 18023, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 1600, 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core 5 120U, 0.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, and 0.7% behind the Intel Core i5-1334U.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC, with the codename Gorgon Point and a generation label of Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). It combines 12 cores with 24 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading. The cache layout is per-core: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. The die size is 233 mm². The Intel Core 5 320 uses the Wildcat Lake codename on a 3 nm process from Intel's own foundry. It has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning no hyper-threading. Its cache is structured differently: 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has no recorded die size. The AMD part supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part supports PCIe Gen 4 with only 6 lanes. The integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD chip integrates a Radeon 890M, and the Intel chip integrates Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. The AMD processor uses an AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1516. The memory support is identical in type (DDR5 and LPDDR5X), but the AMD chip runs dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel chip runs single-channel with 59.7 GB/s. Neither chip supports ECC memory. Both are mobile parts with active production status. The release dates differ: the AMD chip is dated late 2025, and the Intel chip is dated mid-April 2026.

Specification Differences

The key specification differences are the core counts, clock speeds, TDP, cache, memory channel, PCIe lanes, socket, process node, and integrated graphics. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads, a 2.00 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock, and a 28 W TDP. The Intel Core 5 320 has 6 cores and 6 threads, a 1.50 GHz base clock and 4.60 GHz boost clock, and a 15 W TDP. The AMD cache totals 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3. The Intel cache is 192 KB L1, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB shared L3. The AMD chip uses dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel chip uses single-channel memory with 59.7 GB/s. The AMD chip has 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, and the Intel chip has 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 3 nm process from Intel. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel chip uses Intel BGA 1516. The integrated graphics are Radeon 890M on the AMD side and Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe) on the Intel side. The Intel Core 5 320 has a launch MSRP of $340, while the AMD chip has no listed launch MSRP. Both chips have locked multipliers. The AMD part number is 100-000001859, and the Intel part number is SAE3H.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 and the Intel Core 5 320. The only recorded benchmark scores belong to the Intel chip. The Intel Core 5 320 shows a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 1054 and a single-core score of 276. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5462 multi-core and 771 single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 6197 multi-core and 1926 single-core. PassMark results for the Intel chip include 148779 in data compression, 10984 in data encryption, 13262 in extended instructions, 110 in find prime numbers, 42440 in floating point math, 32323 in integer math, 15450 in multithread, 1221 in physics, 18038 in random string sorting, and 4045 in single thread. The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 18023, with a 72nd percentile ranking. The AMD part has no benchmark scores or average score in the database, so its wins cannot be quantified. The core and thread advantage for the AMD chip (12 cores and 24 threads versus 6 cores and 6 threads) strongly suggests it would lead in multi-threaded tests, but no recorded scores confirm this. The Intel chip's nearest rivals provide context: it sits 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 5 1600, 0.7% above the Intel Core 5 120U, 0.7% above the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT, and 0.7% below the Intel Core i5-1334U. Those deltas are small, placing the Intel Core 5 320 in a tight performance cluster.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 wins in scenarios that exploit its 24 threads. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration with a 5.20 GHz boost clock and 16 MB L3 cache is built for video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing. The dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth supports data-heavy workloads that need more memory throughput. The 28 W TDP indicates a higher power budget, which allows sustained performance under load. The Intel Core 5 320 wins in power-sensitive and single-thread-bound situations. Its 15 W TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops, fanless designs, or any system where heat and battery life matter more than raw throughput. The single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth is simpler and consumes less power. The recorded scores show a capable single-thread result (1926 in Cinebench R23 single-core), which covers everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light media playback. The Intel chip also wins on integration simplicity: 6 PCIe Gen 4 lanes versus 16, and a smaller cache footprint. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $340, which is a fixed point in the database. The AMD chip has no listed MSRP, so no cost comparison is possible. The percentile data supports this split: the Intel chip ranks in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, indicating solid mainstream performance, while the AMD chip's 50th percentile reflects its unmeasured status rather than a performance judgment. For users who prioritize multi-core throughput and memory bandwidth, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 is the logical choice. For users who prioritize low power draw and single-thread responsiveness, the Intel Core 5 320 delivers within its constraints.