AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Core i5-110
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Intel Core i5-110
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and the Intel Core i5-110. The AMD part holds a substantial lead across every measured workload category, with no benchmark results available for the Intel Core i5-110 in the database. This absence of recorded scores for the Intel processor means the comparison is based entirely on the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's measured results and the architectural differences between the two parts.
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21812, which places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its single-core Cinebench R23 result sits at 1988. In Geekbench testing, the AMD chip records a multi-core score of 13957 and a single-core score of 2084. These figures indicate strong overall throughput, particularly in multi-threaded workloads where the 12-core, 24-thread configuration provides substantial parallelism.
PassMark results for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 further illustrate its capabilities. The multi-thread score of 32916, single-thread score of 3867, integer math score of 121754, and floating point math score of 75153 all reflect a processor that handles both general-purpose and math-intensive tasks effectively. Data encryption performance reaches 20802, extended instructions score 29269, and random string sorting achieves 44552. The data compression workload records 404918, while physics simulation scores 1819 and prime number finding records 122.
The Intel Core i5-110 has no benchmark entries in the database. Its percentile ranking of 50th among all CPUs is based on its position in the broader market, but without direct measured scores, a head-to-head numerical comparison is not possible. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, by contrast, has a complete benchmark profile and an average benchmark score of 46030.
Nearest rival data for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 provides context for its standing. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 posts an average score of 46062, which is 0.1 percent higher than the AMD part. The AMD EPYC 4364P averages 45970, placing it 0.1 percent behind. The Intel Core i9-13900HX scores 46098, also 0.1 percent ahead of the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. The AMD EPYC 7303 averages 45960, which is 0.2 percent lower than the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 46030 average. These deltas are minimal, indicating that the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 sits in a tightly competitive band with these processors despite its mobile form factor.
The Verdict
The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is the stronger processor in every measurable dimension. Its 12 cores and 24 threads, paired with a 5.10 GHz boost clock, deliver benchmark results that place it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-110, with 6 cores and 12 threads, a 4.30 GHz boost clock, and a 50th percentile ranking, cannot match the AMD part's throughput based on the available information.
The absence of benchmark scores for the Intel Core i5-110 is itself a significant finding. A processor that has been in the database with no recorded performance data offers no evidence of competitive capability. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, with its complete set of measured results, stands as the only part in this comparison with verified performance.
The architecture gap reinforces the benchmark disparity. The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while the Intel part uses Intel's 14 nm process. This process generation difference contributes to the AMD chip's efficiency and performance characteristics. The AMD part also supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, whereas the Intel part is limited to DDR4 with 42.7 GB/s. Memory bandwidth alone gives the AMD processor a 46.7 GB/s advantage, which directly impacts memory-sensitive workloads.
Users who rely on multi-threaded productivity, content creation, or heavy multitasking should select the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. The data shows no scenario where the Intel Core i5-110 offers a measurable advantage, since it has no recorded benchmarks and a substantially lower hardware configuration.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part provides double the core count and double the thread count.
Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core i5-110 has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel part starts at a higher base frequency, but the AMD part boosts 0.80 GHz higher.
Q: How do the processors compare in memory support?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-110 supports only DDR4 with a bandwidth of 42.7 GB/s. The AMD part offers more than double the memory bandwidth.
Q: What integrated graphics do the processors include?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 includes the Radeon 890M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-110 includes the UHD Graphics 630 integrated graphics.
Q: What is the benchmark percentile ranking for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 ranks in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-110 ranks in the 50th percentile. The AMD part sits well above the median, while the Intel part sits exactly at it.
Q: Does the Intel Core i5-110 have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No. The database contains no benchmark entries for the Intel Core i5-110. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has a full set of recorded scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark workloads.
Specification Differences
The two processors differ across nearly every specification field recorded in the database.
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD part and 2.90 GHz for the Intel part. Boost clocks are 5.10 GHz and 4.30 GHz respectively. The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 65 watts.
Socket compatibility diverges completely. The AMD processor mounts in AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1200. The AMD part is designated for mobile market segments, and the Intel part is designated for desktop market segments.
Cache configurations differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-110 provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.
PCIe support differs by generation and lane count. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Neither processor supports ECC memory. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.
The die size of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is 233 mm². The die size for the Intel Core i5-110 is not recorded in the database. The AMD part number is 100-000001682, and the Intel part number is SA35X. The Intel Core i5-110 has a launch MSRP of $200; no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD part.
Architecture Differences
The fundamental architecture gap between these processors is substantial. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Strix Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-110 uses the Comet Lake architecture, belonging to the Core i5 generation under the same Comet Lake codename.
Manufacturing processes differ by two full generations. The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC. The Intel processor is built on a 14 nm process node at Intel. This process difference is a primary driver of the AMD part's higher core count, higher boost clock, and lower 28 watt TDP compared to the Intel part's 65 watt TDP.
Memory architecture reflects the generational divide. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X through a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 through a dual-channel bus with 42.7 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD part's memory subsystem offers more than double the bandwidth of the Intel part.
Cache hierarchy design also differs. The AMD part allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part allocates 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, with 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip's larger per-core L2 and L3 allocations support its higher thread count.
The integrated graphics solutions come from different vendors with different capabilities. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 includes the Radeon 890M, while the Intel Core i5-110 includes the UHD Graphics 630. The recorded data does not include graphics benchmark scores for either part.
Where Each One Wins
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 wins in every category with recorded data. Multi-threaded workloads benefit from the 12-core, 24-thread configuration, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21812 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 32916. Single-threaded performance is also strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1988 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3867.
Memory-intensive applications favor the AMD processor because of its 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, which exceeds the Intel part's 42.7 GB/s by a significant margin. The DDR5 and LPDDR5X support provides a modern memory pathway that the Intel part's DDR4 support cannot match.
Math-heavy workloads favor the AMD processor based on PassMark results. Integer math scores 121754, floating point math scores 75153, and extended instructions score 29269. Data encryption at 20802 and data compression at 404918 also show strength in these specific workloads.
Mobile deployments favor the AMD processor due to its 28 watt TDP, which is less than half of the Intel part's 65 watt TDP. The AMD processor is a mobile-market part using AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor is a desktop-market part using Intel Socket 1200. The AMD part's higher performance comes with lower power consumption, an unusual combination that the data confirms.
The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded wins in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking places it at the median of all CPUs, but without benchmark scores, there is no measured workload where it demonstrates an advantage. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, with its 89th percentile ranking and complete benchmark profile, is the clear choice across all categories with available data.