AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Intel Core 7 240H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a decisive picture: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 wins all 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the Intel Core 7 240H. The margin of victory varies widely by workload, from a narrow 2.2% single-thread edge to a commanding 73.2% lead in extended instruction tests.

Starting with the multi-core Cinebench results, the AMD part scores 3,334 in Cinebench R15 multi-core versus 2,360 for Intel, a 41.3% advantage. The newer R23 test shows a similar pattern: 21,812 for AMD against 15,764 for Intel, a 38.4% gap. These are substantial deltas that indicate the AMD processor's 12 cores and 24 threads provide a meaningful throughput advantage over Intel's 10 cores and 16 threads in heavily threaded rendering workloads.

Single-core performance tells a closer story. In Cinebench R15 single-core, AMD scores 301 versus Intel's 249, a 20.9% lead. The R23 single-core test shows 1,988 against 1,719, a 15.6% margin. Interestingly, the PassMark single-thread test narrows the gap considerably: 3,867 versus 3,782, only 2.2% apart. This suggests that while AMD has a clear architectural advantage in some single-thread scenarios, the Intel part's 5.20 GHz boost clock helps it remain competitive in lighter, frequency-sensitive tasks.

The PassMark suite reveals where the AMD processor truly separates itself. In integer math, AMD scores 121,754 versus 80,396, a 51.4% advantage. Floating-point math shows 75,153 against 58,905, a 27.6% lead. Extended instructions deliver the largest delta at 73.2% (29,269 versus 16,897), indicating that the Zen 5 architecture's instruction handling is significantly more efficient. Data compression favors AMD by 49% (404,918 versus 271,774), while random string sorting shows a 54.3% gap (44,552 versus 28,866). Data encryption is 37.3% faster on AMD (20,802 versus 15,155), and the multi-thread PassMark score lands at 32,916 versus 23,975, a 37.3% difference.

The closest contest in the entire dataset is PassMark physics: 1,819 for AMD versus 1,723 for Intel, just 5.6% apart. Prime number finding also stays relatively tight at 19.6% (122 versus 102). These smaller gaps suggest that in certain integer-heavy, latency-sensitive operations, the Intel chip's higher base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost of 5.20 GHz partially offset AMD's core count advantage.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark distribution shows no workload category where the Intel Core 7 240H comes out ahead. Every recorded test, from Cinebench rendering to PassMark's various math and compression workloads, lands in AMD's favor. However, the magnitude of AMD's win varies by application type, which creates distinct use-case profiles.

For multi-threaded productivity workloads such as video rendering, 3D modeling, and batch data processing, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is the clear choice. The 38.4% Cinebench R23 multi-core lead and 37.3% PassMark multi-thread advantage directly translate to faster completion times for tasks that scale across cores. The 49% data compression advantage matters for file archiving and database workloads, while the 51.4% integer math lead benefits scientific computing and financial modeling.

Single-thread-light workloads, such as office applications, web browsing, and basic coding, show a smaller but still consistent AMD advantage. The 2.2% PassMark single-thread margin and 15.6% Cinebench R23 single-core lead mean the AMD processor will feel snappier in everyday use, though the difference is less pronounced than in multi-core tasks.

The extended instructions result (73.2% lead) points to AMD's advantage in workloads using AVX-512 or similar instruction sets, which appear in some AI inference, scientific simulation, and media encoding applications. Data encryption at 37.3% faster also gives AMD an edge in security-related tasks like full-disk encryption and VPN traffic processing.

The Intel part's closest showing in physics (5.6% behind) and prime numbers (19.6% behind) suggests it remains viable for light simulation or mathematical workloads where single-thread efficiency matters more than raw core count, but even there, AMD holds the lead.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 in multi-core rendering?

A: The AMD processor leads by 41.3% in Cinebench R15 multi-core (3,334 versus 2,360) and by 38.4% in Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,812 versus 15,764).

Q: Is the single-core performance difference significant?

A: The gap varies by test. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a 15.6% AMD lead (1,988 versus 1,719), but PassMark single-thread narrows it to 2.2% (3,867 versus 3,782). The Intel part's 5.20 GHz boost clock helps it stay close in frequency-sensitive tasks.

Q: Which processor has better data compression performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 scores 404,918 in PassMark data compression versus 271,774 for Intel, a 49% advantage. This directly impacts file archiving and database operations.

Q: What about encryption workloads?

A: AMD leads by 37.3% in PassMark data encryption (20,802 versus 15,155), making it the stronger option for encryption-heavy tasks like secure file transfers or VPN processing.

Q: How do the processors compare in the PassMark extended instructions test?

A: AMD scores 29,269 versus Intel's 16,897, a 73.2% lead. This is the largest single delta in the entire benchmark set, indicating a major advantage in workloads that use advanced instruction sets.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where Intel wins?

A: No. The database records 15 head-to-head comparisons, and AMD wins all 15. The closest Intel result is PassMark physics (1,723 versus 1,819, a 5.6% gap), but AMD still comes out ahead.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ significantly across nearly every core specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core 7 240H uses 10 cores and 16 threads. AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a 5.10 GHz boost, while Intel runs a higher 2.50 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost. The rated TDP also differs: AMD is rated at 28 watts, Intel at 45 watts, meaning Intel consumes more power at its default specification.

Memory support diverges as well. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel configuration and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database does not list a bandwidth figure for Intel. PCIe capabilities differ: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while Intel uses Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Both lack ECC memory support and both are locked (multiplier not unlocked).

The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel BGA 1744. Release dates differ by roughly five and a half months, with AMD released on 2024-06-30 and Intel on 2024-12-17. Intel has a recorded launch MSRP of $502; AMD has no launch MSRP in the database. Both are classified as mobile processors and both are currently active in production.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is substantial. AMD uses Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-H codename, part of the Core 7 generation based on Raptor Lake Refresh. This is a fundamental difference: AMD's newer Zen 5 design targets efficiency and high instructions-per-clock, while Intel's Raptor Lake is a more mature, higher-frequency design.

Manufacturing processes also differ sharply. AMD fabricates on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². Intel uses a 10 nm process at its own foundry, with no die size recorded in the database. The smaller 4 nm node helps AMD achieve its 28-watt TDP despite having more cores, while Intel's 45-watt TDP reflects the older, less dense process.

Cache configurations show distinct strategies. Both have 80 KB L1 per core. AMD provides 1 MB L2 per core, while Intel provides 2 MB L2 per core, giving Intel a per-core L2 advantage. For L3, AMD has 16 MB total, while Intel has 24 MB shared. This means Intel has more total cache capacity, which may help in workloads with large working sets, though the benchmark data shows AMD still wins across all recorded tests.

Integrated graphics differ as well: AMD uses the Radeon 890M, while Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 64EU. The database does not include graphics benchmarks, so the relative GPU performance cannot be quantified here. Both processors use dual-channel memory controllers, and neither supports ECC memory. AMD's memory bandwidth is listed at 89.6 GB/s, while Intel's is not recorded.

The Verdict

The benchmark data supports a straightforward selection: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 outperforms the Intel Core 7 240H in every recorded test. The AMD processor's 89th percentile ranking among all CPUs, compared to Intel's 82nd percentile, confirms its higher overall standing in the database. The average benchmark score reflects this: AMD averages 46,030 across all tests, while Intel averages 31,483, a difference that aligns with the 15-0 head-to-head sweep.

For workloads that demand multi-threaded throughput, such as rendering, compilation, data compression, and encryption, the AMD processor's 12-core, 24-thread configuration with Zen 5 architecture delivers advantages ranging from 27.6% to 73.2% over Intel. The 38.4% Cinebench R23 multi-core lead and 49% data compression advantage are particularly relevant for content creators and data professionals. The 73.2% extended instructions margin signals strong performance in AVX-heavy scientific or AI workloads.

For users prioritizing single-thread responsiveness, the choice is less obvious but still favors AMD. The 2.2% PassMark single-thread margin is small, and Intel's higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz keeps it competitive. However, the 15.6% Cinebench R23 single-core lead gives AMD a more substantial edge in that specific rendering test.

The Intel Core 7 240H offers a higher base clock (2.50 GHz versus 2.00 GHz), more L3 cache (24 MB versus 16 MB), and PCIe Gen 5 support, which may matter for certain I/O configurations. Its 45-watt TDP, however, indicates higher power draw, and its 82nd percentile ranking places it below AMD in overall performance. The $502 launch MSRP for Intel provides a reference point, but the database does not list a price for AMD, so a direct cost comparison is not possible from this data.

The verdict from the recorded measurements is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is the faster processor across every benchmark category in the database. Users who need maximum multi-core performance, encryption throughput, or instruction-set flexibility should select AMD. Users constrained by Intel's specific platform requirements, such as the BGA 1744 socket or PCIe Gen 5 lanes, may still consider the Core 7 240H, but they will be accepting a performance deficit in every recorded test.