AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison

# AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Intel Core 5 223PE

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 and Intel Core 5 223PE represent two distinct approaches to processor design, with the former built for mobile platforms on a 4 nm TSMC process and the latter targeting desktop systems on Intel's 10 nm node. The recorded data shows a split decision across benchmark suites: the AMD part wins 7 of the 15 head-to-head comparisons, while the Intel part takes 8. The overall average benchmark scores place the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 at 46030, ranking it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 223PE averages 40585, placing it in the 87th percentile. These figures indicate that both processors sit in a similar performance tier, but their strengths diverge sharply across different workloads.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most dramatic single-core result in the database comes from Cinebench R23 single-core testing, where the Intel Core 5 223PE scores 3734 against the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 1988. That is a 46.8% advantage for Intel, the largest margin in any recorded test. The Cinebench R15 single-core test tells a similar story, with Intel leading 376 to 301, a 19.9% gap. The PassMark single-thread test confirms the pattern, with Intel at 4219 and AMD at 3867, an 8.3% edge for Intel. These results show that the Intel Core 5 223PE has a substantial lead in lightly threaded workloads, which the database attributes to its higher single-core clock behavior.

Multi-core testing produces a more complicated picture. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 wins 3334 to 2666, a 25.1% margin. However, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core 5 223PE reverses the result, scoring 26455 against AMD's 21812, a 17.6% advantage for Intel. This inconsistency between the two Cinebench versions is notable. The R15 result favors AMD's 12-core, 24-thread configuration, while the R23 result favors Intel's 8-core, 16-thread design. The PassMark multi-thread test lands closer, with AMD ahead 32916 to 31124, a 5.8% margin.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 shows pronounced strength in several specialized PassMark workloads. In data compression, AMD scores 404918 against Intel's 346623, a 16.8% lead. In data encryption, AMD wins 20802 to 18448, a 12.8% margin. Extended instruction testing shows AMD ahead 29269 to 24672, an 18.6% advantage. Integer math favors AMD heavily at 121754 versus 99819, a 22% gap. Random string sorting also goes to AMD, 44552 to 35798, a 24.5% margin.

The Intel Core 5 223PE wins the remaining tests. Prime number finding goes to Intel 159 to 122, a 23.3% margin. Floating point math is nearly even, with Intel ahead 76468 to 75153, just 1.7%. Physics simulation favors Intel 2493 to 1819, a 27% margin, the second-largest difference in the entire comparison after the R23 single-core result.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear separation of use cases. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 delivers superior throughput in data-centric and encryption-heavy workloads, with double-digit percentage wins in data compression, encryption, extended instructions, integer math, and random string sorting. The Intel Core 5 223PE counters with dominant single-core performance and wins in physics simulation and prime number finding.

For users whose workloads depend on single-threaded responsiveness, the Intel Core 5 223PE is the stronger choice based on the recorded data. Its 46.8% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and 8.3% lead in PassMark single-thread are substantial margins that would translate into faster application launch times and snappier interactive performance in lightly threaded software.

For multi-threaded throughput in data processing, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 appears more balanced. It wins PassMark multi-thread by 5.8% and Cinebench R15 multi-core by 25.1%, though it loses Cinebench R23 multi-core by 17.6%. The AMD part also holds a 89th percentile ranking against all CPUs, two points above Intel's 87th percentile, and its average benchmark score of 46030 is well above Intel's 40585.

The Intel Core 5 223PE carries a launch MSRP of $232. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has no listed launch price, and the two processors target different market segments: AMD's part is mobile, while Intel's is desktop. The AMD chip uses a 28 watt TDP, while the Intel chip uses a 65 watt TDP, which should be considered in platform planning.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 wins in scenarios that stress parallel data manipulation. Data compression, encryption, extended instruction sets, and integer math all show AMD with double-digit leads. The 12-core, 24-thread configuration with Zen 5 architecture and 16 MB of L3 cache appears well suited to these workloads. The AMD part also wins the PassMark multi-thread test, indicating strong general multi-core performance.

The Intel Core 5 223PE wins in single-threaded performance across every recorded single-thread test. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3734 is nearly double AMD's 1988. Physics simulation shows a 27% advantage for Intel, and prime number finding shows a 23.3% advantage. Floating point math is essentially tied, with Intel ahead by just 1.7%. The Intel part's 8 cores, 16 threads, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, combined with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, drive these results.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core result is interesting because it contradicts the overall multi-thread pattern. Intel wins that test by 17.6%, suggesting that the Intel Core 5 223PE can sustain high multi-core throughput under certain sustained loads, despite having fewer cores and threads. The PassMark multi-thread result, which AMD wins by 5.8%, shows a different workload distribution.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 also includes the Radeon 890M integrated graphics, while the Intel Core 5 223PE includes UHD Graphics 730. No graphics benchmarks appear in the database, so the performance difference cannot be quantified, but the specifications differ clearly. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part supports ECC memory, which the AMD part does not.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE wins every single-thread test in the database. It leads by 46.8% in Cinebench R23 single-core, 19.9% in Cinebench R15 single-core, and 8.3% in PassMark single-thread.

Q: Which processor is better for multi-threaded workloads?

A: The results are mixed. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 25.1% and PassMark multi-thread by 5.8%, but the Intel Core 5 223PE wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 17.6%.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 5 223PE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the difference in cache configuration?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 223PE uses 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE boosts to 5.20 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 boosts to 5.10 GHz.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core 5 223PE supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, but only the Intel part supports ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Point codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 233 mm². The processor uses 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The TDP is 28 watts. The socket is AMD Socket FP8, and the processor is marked for the mobile market segment. It uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are Radeon 890M. The part number is 100-000001682, and it was released on 2024-06-30.

The Intel Core 5 223PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The processor uses 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The TDP is 65 watts. The socket is Intel Socket 1700, and the processor is marked for the desktop market segment. It uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730. The part number is SA4QF, and it was released on 2026-03-08. The launch MSRP is $232.

The cache hierarchies differ in L2 and L3. The AMD part provides 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3. The Intel part provides 2 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3. Both provide 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part uses a dual-channel memory bus with DDR5 and LPDDR5X support. The Intel part uses a dual-channel bus with DDR4 and DDR5 support. Both achieve 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. ECC memory support is present only on the Intel part.

The process node difference is substantial: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The generation labels also differ, with AMD listed as Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) and Intel listed as Core 5 (Bartlett Lake). The AMD part's production status is Active, as is the Intel part's. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either platform based on the recorded specifications.

The nearest rival data places the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 against the Intel Core Ultra 5 235 with a 0.1% delta, the AMD EPYC 4364P with a 0.1% delta, the Intel Core i9-13900HX with a 0.1% delta, and the AMD EPYC 7303 with a 0.2% delta. The Intel Core 5 223PE sits near the Intel Core 7 253PE with a 0.1% delta, the Intel Xeon 6357P with a 0.1% delta, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H with a 0.2% delta, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G with a 0.3% delta. These proximity values show that both processors compete within tightly packed performance clusters, with the AMD part slightly higher in overall average score and percentile ranking.

The benchmark database records 15 head-to-head tests between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 wins 7 of them, while the Intel Core 5 223PE wins 8. The wins are not evenly distributed by workload type. AMD dominates data processing tasks, while Intel dominates single-thread and physics-based tasks. The average benchmark score for AMD is 46030 across all recorded tests, while Intel averages 40585. The percentile rankings, 89th for AMD and 87th for Intel, reflect this overall gap.