AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and the Intel Processor U302L, driven primarily by core count, clock speeds, and architectural generation. The AMD part scores 21,761 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning all comparative analysis must rely on the AMD processor's absolute results and its position among other CPUs.

In single-threaded workloads, the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 delivers 2,018 points in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2,407 points in Geekbench single-core. The 3DMark single-thread test records 1,153 points, and PassMark single-thread shows 3,973 points. These figures place the AMD chip in the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37,904. The nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14901E, posts an average score of 37,911, a delta of 0%, indicating the AMD processor essentially matches a high-end Intel desktop part in overall benchmark averages.

The 3DMark multi-threaded results for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 show 9,365 points at 16 threads and 9,725 points at max threads. The 8-thread score reaches 6,992, the 4-thread score 3,970, and the 2-thread score 2,179. These numbers demonstrate strong scaling from two threads up to the full 24-thread configuration, with the max-thread score exceeding the 16-thread score by roughly 3.8%. The 2-thread to 4-thread scaling shows an 82% improvement, while 4-thread to 8-thread scaling shows a 76% improvement, indicating efficient utilization of additional cores.

PassMark results for the AMD processor include 445,719 in data compression, 22,252 in data encryption, 31,653 in extended instructions, 126 in find prime numbers, 76,892 in floating point math, 122,933 in integer math, 35,148 in multithread, 1,881 in physics, 48,723 in random string sorting, and 3,973 in single-thread. The integer math score is roughly 60% higher than the floating point math score, which is typical for modern x86 processors. The data compression score dominates the PassMark suite, reflecting the benefits of a large 16 MB L3 cache and high memory bandwidth.

Since the Intel Processor U302L has zero recorded benchmarks, the database cannot produce head-to-head win counts. The winsA and winsB fields both show zero, but the absence of Intel data means the AMD processor's scores stand as the only quantitative evidence. The Intel chip's average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile rank is 50, compared to the AMD chip's 86th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Processor U302L uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename, belonging to the Intel Processor generation. These architectural differences explain the performance disparity.

The manufacturing process differs significantly. AMD fabricates the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while Intel fabricates the Processor U302L on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The smaller process node typically enables higher transistor density and better power efficiency. The AMD die measures 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded.

Core configuration shows a stark contrast. The AMD processor has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor has 5 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, whereas the Intel part runs at 1.20 GHz base and 2.40 GHz boost. The AMD processor's boost clock is more than double the Intel processor's boost clock, which directly impacts both single-threaded and multi-threaded performance.

Cache hierarchies differ as well. Both processors use an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The AMD processor has 1 MB L2 per core and 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel processor has 1.25 MB L2 per core and 10 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part's larger L3 cache, combined with more cores, provides better data locality for multi-threaded workloads. The Intel part's slightly larger L2 per core may help single-threaded access patterns, but the overall cache capacity is lower.

Memory support diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded. The AMD processor's support for LPDDR5X, a lower-power mobile memory standard, aligns with its mobile market segment. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part's doubled lane count enables more attached devices or higher-bandwidth peripherals. The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD processor uses the Radeon 890M, while the Intel processor uses the UHD Graphics 80EU. The Radeon 890M is a high-end integrated GPU, whereas the UHD Graphics 80EU is a more modest solution.

Power profiles differ notably. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 15 W. The AMD part consumes more power but delivers substantially higher performance, while the Intel part targets lower power consumption. The sockets differ as well: AMD uses Socket FP8, and Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD processor's release date is June 30, 2024, while the Intel processor's release date is April 7, 2024. The AMD part's part number is 100-000000994, and the Intel part's part number is SRPKGQ5CX.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 wins in every measurable category, given that the Intel Processor U302L has no recorded benchmark scores. The AMD processor's 12 cores and 24 threads make it suitable for heavily parallel workloads such as video rendering, 3D modeling, scientific computing, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21,761 and the PassMark multithread score of 35,148 confirm strong multi-threaded performance. The 3DMark max-thread score of 9,725 further validates this capability.

The AMD processor's 5.10 GHz boost clock and 2,018 Cinebench R23 single-core score indicate strong single-threaded performance as well. Single-threaded applications such as web browsing, office productivity, and legacy software benefit from this high clock speed. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,407 and PassMark single-thread score of 3,973 reinforce this strength.

The AMD processor's 16 MB L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support data-intensive workloads. The PassMark data compression score of 445,719 and random string sorting score of 48,723 show strong memory subsystem performance. The floating point math score of 76,892 and integer math score of 122,933 indicate robust arithmetic processing, useful in financial modeling, engineering simulations, and data analysis.

The Intel Processor U302L, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot claim wins in any category. Its 5 cores and 6 threads, 1.20 GHz base clock, and 2.40 GHz boost clock suggest it targets low-power, light-duty mobile computing. The 15 W TDP and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory imply a focus on battery efficiency and basic productivity. The UHD Graphics 80EU integrated GPU handles display output and light graphics tasks. The Intel processor's 10 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 per core provide adequate cache for its core count.

The AMD processor's 86th percentile rank among all CPUs places it well above the Intel processor's 50th percentile. The nearest rival comparison shows the AMD processor essentially ties the Intel Core i9-14901E with a 0% delta in average score, and it slightly edges the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X with a -0.1% delta (meaning the Ryzen 7 scores 0.1% higher). The Intel Core 5 211E trails by 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 trails by 0.3%. These rival comparisons place the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 in the upper tier of available processors.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. The AMD processor offers more than double the cores and four times the threads.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare?

A: The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 2.7 GHz higher.

Q: What are the cache configurations?

A: Both use 80 KB L1 per core. The AMD processor has 1 MB L2 per core and 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel processor has 1.25 MB L2 per core and 10 MB shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has better memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory, but its bandwidth is not recorded.

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 W, and the Intel processor has a TDP of 15 W. The Intel part consumes less power.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Neither processor supports ECC memory. Both list ECC support as false.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Intel Processor U302L |

|----------------|------------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 12 | 5 |

| Threads | 24 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Strix Point | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 10 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 8 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 80EU |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-04-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $285 |

| Part Number | 100-000000994 | SRPKGQ5CX |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 86 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 37,904 | 0 |