AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Intel Core i5-14500 Comparison

The Intel Core i5-14500 and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 represent two distinct approaches to modern processor design, but the benchmark data from the database shows a decisive performance gap. While both processors achieve an identical 86th percentile ranking among all CPUs, the recorded measurements indicate that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the dominant performer across nearly the entire test suite, winning 16 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking difference appears in multi-core rendering workloads, where the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 demonstrates a substantial advantage. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD scores 21761 against the Intel's 15012, a 31% deficit for the Intel part. Similarly, in Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD's 3409.5 score dwarfs the Intel's 2435, representing a 28.6% advantage. This pattern holds in the Geekbench multi-core test, where AMD's 15242 exceeds Intel's 13390 by 12.2%.

The data reveals that the AMD processor also leads in single-core performance, though the margins are narrower. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD scores 2018 versus Intel's 1917, a 5% difference. The Cinebench R15 single-core test shows a 10.9% gap, with AMD at 306.5 and Intel at 273. Geekbench single-core results follow suit, with AMD's 2407 outperforming Intel's 2099 by 12.8%. The Passmark single-thread test shows a much tighter race, with AMD's 3973 edging out Intel's 3952 by just 0.5%.

Memory-intensive and specialized workloads further reinforce the AMD victory. In Passmark data compression, AMD scores 445719 against Intel's 371294, a 16.7% lead. The extended instructions test shows a 29% advantage for AMD, with scores of 31653 versus 22473. Passmark integer math sees AMD at 122933 against Intel's 108124, a 12% difference. Random string sorting also favors AMD by 15.9%, with scores of 48723 and 40980 respectively.

The AMD processor maintains its advantage in several other categories. Passmark multi-thread scores show AMD at 35148 versus Intel's 30777, a 12.4% gap. The Find Prime Numbers test records AMD at 126 against Intel's 106, a 15.9% difference. Data encryption shows a smaller 3.6% edge for AMD, scoring 22252 versus 21457. Physics calculations also favor AMD, with 1881 versus 1746, a 7.2% difference.

The Intel Core i5-14500 claims a single victory in the entire head-to-head suite: Passmark floating-point math. Here, Intel scores 79576, edging out AMD's 76892 by 3.5%. This notable win suggests that the Intel architecture retains some advantages in specific mathematical workloads, but it remains an isolated data point against 16 AMD wins.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 21761 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which is 31% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500's score of 15012.

Q: How large is the single-core performance gap between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 leads in all recorded single-core tests. The smallest gap is 0.5% in Passmark single-thread (3973 versus 3952), while the largest is 12.8% in Geekbench single-core (2407 versus 2099).

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14500 win any benchmark comparisons?

A: Yes, the Intel Core i5-14500 wins the Passmark floating-point math test with a score of 79576, which is 3.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370's score of 76892.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500 has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 12 cores and 24 threads. Despite fewer physical cores, the AMD processor achieves higher multi-threaded scores.

Q: How do the two processors compare in data compression performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 445719 in Passmark data compression, which is 16.7% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500's score of 371294.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-14500 has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different technological foundations. The Intel Core i5-14500 uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 employs the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Strix Point, built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. This process advantage is likely a contributing factor to the AMD's performance efficiency, particularly given its significantly lower thermal design power.

The die sizes are comparable, with Intel at 215 mm² and AMD at 233 mm². Cache hierarchies differ notably: Intel provides 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while AMD offers 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. Both share the same 80 KB L1 cache per core. The AMD's smaller L2 and L3 allocations, despite its performance lead, highlight the efficiency of the Zen 5 architecture.

Memory support represents another key divergence. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, while the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, also dual-channel. The AMD processor has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, a specification not listed for the Intel part. ECC memory support is present on the Intel but absent on the AMD.

Connectivity and graphics differ substantially. Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while AMD offers PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics solutions are the UHD Graphics 770 for Intel and the Radeon 890M for AMD. The market segments reflect their intended usage: Intel is a desktop processor on Socket 1700, while AMD is a mobile processor on Socket FP8.

The power envelopes are dramatically different. The Intel Core i5-14500 has a TDP of 65 watts, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 operates at just 28 watts. This 37-watt difference is substantial, yet the AMD processor still outperforms the Intel part in nearly every benchmark, indicating a remarkable performance-per-watt advantage for the Zen 5 architecture.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents an unambiguous picture. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the superior processor in 16 of 17 recorded tests, with margins ranging from a razor-thin 0.5% in single-thread performance to a commanding 31% in multi-core rendering. The Intel Core i5-14500's sole victory in floating-point math, with a 3.5% edge, does little to offset the AMD's dominance elsewhere.

For users whose workloads involve multi-threaded rendering, data compression, extended instruction sets, or integer-heavy calculations, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is clearly the better choice based on the recorded data. Its 31% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 29% lead in extended instructions are decisive. Even in single-core tasks, where the Intel part was expected to be competitive, the AMD maintains a consistent, albeit smaller, advantage.

The Intel Core i5-14500 remains a viable option only for specific workloads that heavily utilize floating-point math, where it holds a 3.5% advantage. However, given that this represents the only category where it wins, and considering the AMD's substantial leads elsewhere, the data suggests that most users would achieve better performance with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.

The power efficiency story further reinforces this conclusion. The AMD processor delivers superior performance across nearly all metrics while consuming only 28 watts compared to Intel's 65 watts. This efficiency, combined with the performance dominance, makes the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 the recommended processor for the vast majority of use cases.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i5-14500 | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 14 | 12 |

| Threads | 20 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 2.60 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 28 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Architecture | Raptor Lake | Zen 5 |

| Codename | Raptor Lake-R | Strix Point |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 215 mm² | 233 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 | Radeon 890M |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2024-01-07 | 2024-06-30 |

| Part Number | SRN3T | 100-000000994 |