AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370

CORE STATE Strix Point
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 3 201TE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 4 Cores / 8 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_16_threads
9,365
N/A
3dmark_2_threads
2,179
N/A
3dmark_4_threads
3,970
N/A
3dmark_8_threads
6,992
N/A
3dmark_max_threads
9,725
N/A
3dmark_single_thread
1,153
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
3,409.5
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
306.5
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
21,761
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,018
N/A
geekbench_multicore
15,242
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
2,407
N/A
passmark_data_compression
445,719
N/A
passmark_data_encryption
22,252
N/A
passmark_extended_instructions
31,653
N/A
passmark_find_prime_numbers
126
N/A
passmark_floating_point_math
76,892
N/A
passmark_integer_math
122,933
N/A
passmark_multithread
35,148
N/A
passmark_physics
1,881
N/A
passmark_random_string_sorting
48,723
N/A
passmark_single_thread
3,973
N/A
passmark_singlethread
3,973
N/A

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs Intel Core 3 201TE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data for this comparison is heavily one-sided, as the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has a complete set of recorded scores while the Intel Core 3 201TE has no individual benchmark results in the database. The AMD processor’s average benchmark score sits at 37,904, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core 3 201TE, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of zero and is in the 50th percentile, which indicates that no direct measured performance data exists for it in the database.

Because the Intel part lacks any recorded test scores, the head-to-head analysis relies on the AMD chip’s absolute results and its position relative to other rivals. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,761 and a single-core score of 2,018. In Geekbench, it records 15,242 multicore and 2,407 single-core. The 3DMark results show a maximum-thread score of 9,725, with 8-thread at 6,992, 4-thread at 3,970, 2-thread at 2,179, and single-thread at 1,153. The 16-thread 3DMark score is 9,365.

PassMark results further characterize the AMD part. It scores 35,148 in multithreaded performance and 3,973 in single-thread. Integer math reaches 122,933, floating-point math 76,892, data encryption 22,252, and data compression 445,719. Extended instruction performance is 31,653, while random string sorting hits 48,723. Physics tests produce a score of 1,881, and find prime numbers yields 126. These figures represent the only concrete performance numbers available for this comparison.

The nearest rivals to the AMD processor in the database provide context. The Intel Core i9-14901E has an average score of 37,911, a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X scores 37,943, which is 0.1% higher than the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37,829, 0.2% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804, 0.3% lower. These deltas are tiny, meaning the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 sits in a tight performance cluster with those four processors.

The Intel Core 3 201TE has no nearest rivals listed and no benchmark scores, so its relative performance cannot be quantified. The database records it as active, but with zero average score, any comparison of wins or losses is impossible. The AMD processor holds all measurable wins by default, since the Intel chip has no recorded results to compare against.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The chip has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Its thermal design power is 28 W, and it uses AMD Socket FP8. The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. Memory support covers DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. PCIe connectivity is Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are the Radeon 890M. It is a mobile segment part with a release date of June 30, 2024.

The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename under the Core 3 generation. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The thermal design power is 45 W, higher than the AMD chip. It uses Intel Socket 1700. The process node is 10 nm at Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². Cache includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3. Memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with a bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, which the AMD part lacks. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730. It is a desktop segment part with a release date of January 12, 2025.

The architectural contrast is clear. The AMD processor uses a smaller 4 nm node versus Intel’s 10 nm. The AMD part has three times the core count and three times the thread count. Its boost clock is higher at 5.10 GHz versus 4.60 GHz. The AMD chip has more L3 cache (16 MB versus 12 MB) and higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s). The Intel chip supports ECC memory and PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4. The Intel part has a higher base clock (2.90 GHz versus 2.00 GHz) and a higher TDP (45 W versus 28 W).

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 wins on every measurable performance front, given that the Intel Core 3 201TE has no benchmark results to contest those wins. In multithreaded workloads, the AMD chip’s 12 cores and 24 threads give it a structural advantage. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,761 and Geekbench multicore score of 15,242 indicate strong parallel throughput. PassMark multithread at 35,148 and integer math at 122,933 reinforce this. The 3DMark maximum-thread score of 9,725 shows scaling across many threads.

Single-thread performance on the AMD chip is also strong. Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,018 and Geekbench single-core at 2,407 show competitive per-core speed. PassMark single-thread at 3,973 confirms this. The higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz likely contributes to these results. For tasks that depend on single-core speed, such as older games or lightly threaded applications, the AMD part has a clear edge.

The Intel Core 3 201TE, with no recorded benchmarks, cannot claim any measured wins. Its higher base clock of 2.90 GHz and support for ECC memory give it theoretical advantages in stability-sensitive environments, but the database contains no scores to validate performance. Its 4 cores and 8 threads place it far below the AMD chip in parallel capability. The Intel part’s PCIe Gen 5 connectivity is a feature advantage, but not a benchmark win.

For use-case splits, the AMD processor suits workloads that benefit from many threads: video encoding, 3D rendering, data compression, and scientific computing. The PassMark data compression score of 445,719 and floating-point math of 76,892 indicate heavy number-crunching capability. The Intel processor, in the absence of data, cannot be assigned a winning use case from the database. Its lower core count and higher TDP suggest it is built for a different efficiency point, but no measured evidence supports a specific workload advantage.

The Verdict

The data clearly favors the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. It has the 86th percentile ranking, an average benchmark score of 37,904, and a full suite of scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, 3DMark, and PassMark. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a 50th percentile ranking and an average benchmark score of zero, with no individual tests recorded. Any buyer choosing between these two based on the database would select the AMD part for raw performance.

The AMD chip’s nearest rivals, all within 0.3% of its average score, include the Intel Core i9-14901E, AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, Intel Core 5 211E, and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132. This places the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 in a high-performance tier. The Intel Core 3 201TE has no such company, as its nearest rivals list is empty.

The Intel part’s launch MSRP is $134, which is the only pricing detail in the database. The AMD chip has no launch MSRP recorded. The Intel part supports ECC memory and uses PCIe Gen 5, while the AMD part supports faster memory bandwidth and a smaller process node. But without benchmark scores, the Intel chip cannot be recommended for performance. The verdict is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is the only processor in this comparison with measured performance data, and that data is strong.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370?

A: The average benchmark score is 37,904, placing it in the 86th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 201TE have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark results for the Intel Core 3 201TE, and its average benchmark score is zero.

Q: How many cores and threads does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 201TE boosts to 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 3 201TE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 does not.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 3 201TE?

A: The launch MSRP of the Intel Core 3 201TE is $134.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Intel Core 3 201TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 4 |

| Threads | 24 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | None listed |

| Codename | Strix Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe Version | Gen 4 | Gen 5 |

| PCIe Lanes | 16 (CPU only) | 16 (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | June 30, 2024 | January 12, 2025 |

| Part Number | 100-000000994 | SRPKDQ5CK |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 86 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 37,904 | 0 |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 HX 370
3 201TE
Core Specs
Cores
12
4 -66.7%
Threads
24
8 -66.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.9 +45.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.6 -9.8%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.9 +45.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
4.6 -9.8%
Multiplier
20
29 +45.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
45 +60.7%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
106 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Strix Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 3 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
163 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 8
—
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 890M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$134
Part Number
100-000000994
SRPKDQ5CK
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Details View Core 3 201TE Details