AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is the clear performance leader in this comparison. The database shows a 10-core, 20-thread processor with an 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs, while the Intel Processor 300T is a 2-core, 4-thread desktop chip sitting at the 50th percentile. The AMD part records an average benchmark score of 43431, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The AMD processor is designed for mobile platforms, while the Intel part targets desktop builds. The Intel Processor 300T has a launch MSRP of $82, which is the only pricing information available.

The Intel Processor 300T offers a lower core count, no boost clock listed, and a higher TDP of 35 watts compared to 28 watts for the AMD part. The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel chip uses Intel's 10 nm process. The AMD processor is the one to choose for workloads that scale with thread count, such as rendering, compilation, and content creation. The Intel processor, with its higher base clock of 3.40 GHz, serves a different role entirely, but the data does not show any benchmark wins for it.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 generation which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename, built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 163 mm². The AMD chip integrates a Radeon 880M graphics unit, while the Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 710. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, with no bandwidth figure recorded. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. PCIe support also differs: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part is listed as an active mobile product with a release date of December 2025, while the Intel part is an active desktop product released in January 2024.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz, but the database records no boost clock for it.

Q: How do their cache configurations compare?

A: Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which processor has the better integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 uses a Radeon 880M, and the Intel Processor 300T uses UHD Graphics 710. The database does not provide direct graphics benchmark scores for either, so the comparison is limited to naming the integrated units.

Q: What is the TDP difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has a TDP of 28 watts, and the Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 | Intel Processor 300T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 2 |

| Threads | 20 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | Not listed |

| TDP | 28 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-S |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part Number | 100-000001861 | SRN3K |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $82 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not include direct head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 and the Intel Processor 300T. Instead, the comparison relies on the recorded benchmark scores for the AMD part and its percentile ranking. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 scores 2672.5 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 247 in Cinebench R15 single-core. In Cinebench R23, it records 17462.5 in multi-core and 1996.5 in single-core. PassMark results for the AMD chip include 349463 in data compression, 17601 in data encryption, 24773 in extended instructions, 124 in find prime numbers, 62411 in floating point math, 99156 in integer math, 28986 in multithread, 1689 in physics, 37379 in random string sorting, and 3750 in single-thread tests. The average benchmark score for the AMD processor is 43431.

The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, so no direct score comparison can be made. The AMD chip sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, whereas the Intel chip sits at the 50th percentile. The nearest rivals to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 in the database are the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 with an average score of 43326 and a delta of 0.2%, the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H with an average score of 43210 and a delta of 0.5%, the AMD Ryzen 7 170 with an average score of 43689 and a delta of -0.6%, and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 with an average score of 43704 and a delta of -0.6%. These deltas indicate that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 performs within 0.6% of all four rivals, placing it in a tightly contested performance band at the top of the database's rankings.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 wins in every category where data exists. Its 10 cores and 20 threads give it a decisive advantage in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17462.5 and the PassMark multithread score of 28986 reflect a processor built for parallel tasks. The 5.00 GHz boost clock supports strong single-thread performance as well, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1996.5 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3750. The 16 MB of L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provide the data path for demanding applications. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics also give the AMD part a more capable iGPU option compared to the UHD Graphics 710 in the Intel chip, though the database does not include graphics benchmarks to quantify the difference.

The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded wins in the database. Its higher base clock of 3.40 GHz and its 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core are the only specifications where it exceeds the AMD part. The Intel chip supports PCIe Gen 5, which is a generation ahead of the AMD chip's PCIe Gen 4, and it supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5. These features matter for desktop platform flexibility, but the absence of benchmark scores means no performance advantage can be confirmed. The Intel part also carries a lower die size of 163 mm², which reflects its simpler 2-core design. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is the processor to select for applications that use many threads, and the Intel Processor 300T is best understood as a basic desktop processor whose strengths are not demonstrated by the recorded data.