AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Intel Core 5 130UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 and the Intel Core 5 130UL. The AMD processor has a full set of recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel processor has no recorded benchmark entries in the database. This absence of comparative data means the analysis must rely on the AMD processor's absolute scores, its position relative to other CPUs in the database, and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,462.5 and a single-core score of 1,996.5. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,672.5 multi-core and 247 single-core. These results place the AMD processor in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 43,431. Its closest rival in the database is the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, which scores 43,326 on average, a delta of just 0.2%. The Intel Core Ultra 9 386H trails by 0.5% with an average score of 43,210. The AMD Ryzen 7 170 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 both outperform it by 0.6%, scoring 43,689 and 43,704 respectively.

The Intel Core 5 130UL sits in the 50th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of zero in the database due to missing benchmark entries. This percentile ranking indicates that approximately half of all recorded CPUs in the database score below this processor, but without direct measurements, its exact performance characteristics remain unquantified. The AMD processor's 88th percentile ranking places it well above the midpoint, suggesting a substantial performance gap between the two parts based on the database's overall distribution.

Where Each One Wins

For the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, the recorded data shows strengths across multiple workload categories. In PassMark integer math, it scores 99,156. Floating point math reaches 62,411. Data compression scores 349,463, while data encryption records 17,601. Extended instruction performance measures 24,773. The processor achieves 28,986 in PassMark multithread testing, 1,689 in physics, and 37,379 in random string sorting. Single-thread performance in PassMark is 3,750, and the find prime numbers test records 124.

These results indicate the AMD processor handles compute-heavy tasks effectively, particularly integer and floating point operations, compression workloads, and multithreaded scenarios. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 17,462.5 reinforces this pattern, showing strong scaling across its 20 threads. The single-core Cinebench R23 result of 1,996.5 suggests capable per-thread performance as well.

The Intel Core 5 130UL has no recorded benchmark wins in the database. Its 50th percentile placement implies it outperforms roughly half of the CPUs in the database, but no specific workload advantages can be identified from the available data. The processor's lower TDP of 15 watts compared to the AMD's 28 watts suggests an efficiency-oriented design, but the database does not contain power or efficiency measurements to confirm this implication.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 uses Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation built on a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The processor features 10 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its TDP is rated at 28 watts, and it uses the AMD Socket FP8.

The Intel Core 5 130UL uses Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-PS codename, built on a 10 nm process by Intel. It also has 10 cores but only 12 threads, with a base clock of 1.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Its TDP is 15 watts, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700. The Intel part is classified as a desktop segment processor, while the AMD part is mobile segment.

Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

PCIe connectivity differs: the AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Both have integrated graphics, with the AMD using Radeon 880M and the Intel using Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. Neither supports ECC memory, and both have locked multipliers. The AMD processor's part number is 100-000001861, while the Intel part number is unknown.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 records an average benchmark score of 43,431 and sits in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 130UL has no recorded benchmark scores and sits in the 50th percentile. This percentile differential of 38 points represents a substantial gap in the database's performance distribution.

The AMD processor's 20 threads versus the Intel's 12 threads, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock versus 4.70 GHz, and 16 MB of L3 cache versus 12 MB, all point toward higher throughput potential. The AMD part also offers more PCIe lanes (16 versus 8) and higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s versus unrecorded). The Intel part counters with a lower TDP of 15 watts versus 28 watts, which indicates lower power draw, but the database contains no efficiency measurements to quantify this trade-off.

For workloads requiring multi-threaded compute, compression, encryption, or math operations, the recorded AMD scores provide concrete evidence of capability. The Intel processor's lack of recorded data means no specific workload claims can be made from the database. Users seeking a processor with documented performance in the 88th percentile should consider the AMD part. Users prioritizing lower TDP might consider the Intel part, but its performance characteristics remain unverified in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has an average benchmark score of 43,431, while the Intel Core 5 130UL has no recorded benchmark scores and an average of zero.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: Both processors have 10 cores, but the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has 20 threads while the Intel Core 5 130UL has 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 130UL boosts to 4.70 GHz.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 130UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has a TDP of 28 watts, and the Intel Core 5 130UL has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Which processor supports more PCIe lanes?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 supports Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 5 130UL supports Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 | Intel Core 5 130UL |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Threads | 20 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Raptor Lake-PS) |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2024-04-07 |

| Part Number | 100-000001861 | Unknown |