AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 vs Intel Core 5 130HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 and the Intel Core 5 130HL. The AMD processor delivered a multi-core score of 17,462.5 in Cinebench R23, while the Intel part has no corresponding entry in the database for that workload. Similarly, in Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD chip scored 2,672.5 points. The Intel Core 5 130HL has no benchmark entries at all in the database, meaning every measurable comparison defaults to the AMD processor's recorded results.

In single-core performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 posted a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,996.5 and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 247. The Intel Core 5 130HL shows no recorded scores for either test. PassMark results further illustrate the gap: the AMD chip scored 3,750 in single-thread performance, 28,986 in multi-thread performance, and 62,411 in floating point math. The Intel part has no PassMark entries, leaving no rival numbers to contrast.

The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 stands at 43,431. The Intel Core 5 130HL carries an average benchmark score of 0, reflecting the absence of recorded data. The AMD processor sits in the 88th percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the Intel part sits in the 50th percentile. That percentile gap, combined with the missing Intel scores, indicates that the AMD chip occupies a much higher performance tier in the database's ranking system.

Where Each One Wins

Every workload category in the database records a win for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465, simply because the Intel Core 5 130HL has no benchmark data. The AMD processor shows a PassMark data compression score of 349,463, data encryption at 17,601, extended instructions at 24,773, and integer math at 99,156. It also records 37,379 in random string sorting and 1689 in physics tests. The Intel part does not appear in any of these categories.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 also holds the only available results for prime number finding (124), which is a lighter workload but still a recorded data point. The Intel Core 5 130HL has zero entries across all test suites, so there is no counterweight to the AMD results in any application type. The database shows the AMD chip as the sole occupant of these measurement rows when compared head-to-head.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 uses a Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm TSMC process with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 5 130HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-PS, built on Intel's 10 nm process. The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD processor has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel processor has 12 cores and 16 threads. The AMD chip's core count is lower, but its thread count is higher by four. Base clock on the AMD part is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a higher base clock at 2.60 GHz but a lower boost clock at 4.80 GHz.

Cache layouts also diverge. Both processors share an L1 cache of 80 KB per core. The AMD chip uses 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip uses 2 MB of L2 per core and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has more total L3 cache, but the AMD part is built on a newer, denser process node.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core 5 130HL supports DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity shows a clear difference. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor provides Gen 4 with only 8 lanes (CPU only). The AMD chip offers double the PCIe lane count. Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses the Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses the Iris Xe Graphics 80EU.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 targets the mobile market segment and uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core 5 130HL targets the desktop segment and uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 45 watts. The AMD part also has a known part number (100-000001861), while the Intel part's part number is listed as unknown.

The release dates differ by roughly a year and a half. The Intel Core 5 130HL was released in April 2024, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 was released at the end of December 2025. Both are listed as active production parts, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data points to a single conclusion: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark results, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 5 130HL has no recorded scores, placing it in the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero. Any user comparing these two parts from the database's perspective would find the AMD processor as the only option with measurable performance data.

The AMD processor's 10 cores and 20 threads, combined with its 5.00 GHz boost clock and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, support its high percentile placement. The Intel part's 12 cores and 16 threads, 4.80 GHz boost clock, and missing memory bandwidth figure do not generate any comparable scores. The AMD part also leads in PCIe lane count (16 versus 8) and uses a smaller process node (4 nm versus 10 nm).

The Intel Core 5 130HL does hold advantages in the specification table: a higher base clock (2.60 GHz versus 2.00 GHz), more L2 cache per core (2 MB versus 1 MB), and more shared L3 cache (18 MB versus 16 MB). It also supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which could matter for platform compatibility. However, without any benchmark entries, these specifications cannot be translated into measured performance in the database.

The AMD processor's avgBenchmarkScore of 43,431 places it alongside rivals like the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 (43,326, 0.2% delta), the Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (43,210, 0.5% delta), the AMD Ryzen 7 170 (43,689, -0.6% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7745 (43,704, -0.6% delta). Those deltas show the AMD chip within one percentage point of four comparable processors. The Intel Core 5 130HL has no rival data to anchor its position.

The verdict from the recorded data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is the part with demonstrated performance, while the Intel Core 5 130HL remains a specification-only entry in the database. The AMD processor's 88th percentile placement, 20 threads, and 5.00 GHz boost clock give it the measured edge. The Intel part's higher core count, higher base clock, and larger L3 cache are the only recorded specification advantages, but they do not translate into any benchmark scores in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 130HL has 12 cores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has 10 cores.

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 130HL has 16 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 5 130HL boosts to 4.80 GHz. The AMD part is 0.20 GHz higher.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 130HL has a base clock of 2.60 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel Core 5 130HL is built on Intel's 10 nm process.

Q: Which processor has more PCIe lanes?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core 5 130HL provides 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only).

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 sits in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 130HL sits in the 50th percentile.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 465 | Intel Core 5 130HL |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 12 |

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Raptor Lake-PS) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | No | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2024-04-07 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001861 | Unknown |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 88 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 43,431 | 0 |