AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Xeon 6507P Comparison

The Intel Xeon 6507P and AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 are both active processors, but they target different segments. The database records the Intel as a server and workstation part with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD is a mobile processor with 10 cores and 20 threads. Both sit at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, and their average benchmark scores are close: 40426 for Intel versus 40048 for AMD. In the 15 head-to-head tests, Intel wins 10 and AMD wins 5. Intel's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H with an average score of 40431 and a 0% delta; AMD's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with an average score of 40081 and a -0.1% delta.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in multi-core rendering?

A: The Intel Xeon 6507P wins Cinebench R23 multi-core by 42% (26548 vs 18698). The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins Cinebench R15 multi-core by 5.8% (2842 vs 2676), so the older test favors AMD.

Q: How do single-thread scores compare?

A: Intel wins Cinebench R23 single-core by 88.1% (3747 vs 1992) and R15 single-core by 24.4% (377 vs 303). AMD wins Passmark single-thread by 5.2% (3841 vs 3643).

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: Intel has 8 cores and 16 threads. AMD has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Does either support ECC memory?

A: Intel supports ECC memory. AMD does not.

Q: What memory bandwidth do they offer?

A: Intel offers 409.6 GB/s over eight-channel DDR5. AMD offers 89.6 GB/s over dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X.

Q: Which has integrated graphics?

A: AMD includes Radeon 880M integrated graphics. Intel has no integrated graphics, recorded as N/A.

Architecture Differences

Intel builds the Xeon 6507P on Granite Rapids, its 5nm process, for Socket 4710. AMD builds the Ryzen AI 9 365 on Zen 5, codename Strix Point, using TSMC's 4nm process, for Socket FP8. The Intel generation is Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP); the AMD generation is Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). Intel's die size is not recorded; AMD's die measures 233 mm².

The core layouts differ. Intel uses 8 cores and 16 threads with a 3.50 GHz base and 4.30 GHz boost. AMD uses 10 cores and 20 threads with a 2.00 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. Intel's TDP is 150W; AMD's is 28W. Cache hierarchies also differ: Intel has 112 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 48 MB shared L3. AMD has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB L3.

Memory and I/O separate them further. Intel supports DDR5 over an eight-channel bus with 409.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s and no ECC. Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 88 lanes; AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes. Intel has no integrated graphics; AMD has Radeon 880M. Intel targets server and workstation; AMD targets mobile.

The Verdict

Pick the Intel Xeon 6507P for server and workstation builds. It wins 10 of 15 head-to-head tests, including Cinebench R23 multi-core by 42%, physics by 72.2%, and find prime numbers by 91.5%. It offers ECC memory, eight-channel DDR5 at 409.6 GB/s, and PCIe Gen 5 with 88 lanes. Its launch MSRP is $765. Intel's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, scores 40431 with a 0% delta, which places the Xeon in a competitive position. The Intel Core i9-13905H also appears as a rival for both parts: it scores 40313 with a 0.3% delta against Intel and a -0.7% delta against AMD.

Pick the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 for mobile systems. It draws 28W versus Intel's 150W, includes Radeon 880M integrated graphics, and wins integer math by 12.7%, data encryption by 3%, and Passmark single-thread by 5.2%. Both CPUs sit at the 87th percentile, and their average scores differ by less than 1% (40426 vs 40048). The AMD has no recorded launch MSRP. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, scores 40081 with a -0.1% delta.

Specification Differences

| Field | Intel Xeon 6507P | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 10 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base clock | 3.50 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 150W | 28W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 4710 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Architecture | Granite Rapids | Zen 5 |

| Codename | Granite Rapids | Strix Point |

| Generation | Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP) | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) |

| Process node | 5 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die size | not recorded | 233 mm² |

| L1 cache | 112 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 cache | 2 MB per core | 1 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 48 MB shared | 16 MB |

| Memory support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 88 lanes | Gen 4, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | N/A | Radeon 880M |

| Market segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Release date | 2025-02-23 | 2024-06-30 |

| Launch MSRP | $765 | not recorded |

| Part number | SRVU5 | 100-000001530 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Intel's largest wins come in single-thread and specialized workloads. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 3747 against AMD's 1992, an 88.1% lead. In Passmark find prime numbers, Intel scores 224 against 117, a 91.5% lead. In Passmark physics, Intel scores 2935 against 1704, a 72.2% lead. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 26548 against 18698, a 42% lead. In Cinebench R15 single-core, Intel scores 377 against 303, a 24.4% lead. Intel also leads in floating point math by 10.8% (69604 vs 62802), extended instructions by 9% (27385 vs 25113), multithread by 6% (31233 vs 29467), data compression by 0.5% (356190 vs 354510), and random string sorting by 0.6% (39682 vs 39447).

AMD's wins are fewer but meaningful. In Passmark integer math, AMD scores 101831 against Intel's 88877, a 12.7% lead. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD scores 2842 against 2676, a 5.8% lead. In Passmark single-thread, AMD scores 3841 against 3643, a 5.2% lead. In Passmark data encryption, AMD scores 18297 against 17753, a 3% lead.

Where Each One Wins

Choose the Intel Xeon 6507P when the workload is multi-threaded rendering, physics simulation, prime number finding, floating point math, or extended instruction sets. It also wins in data compression and random string sorting, though by less than 1%. Its ECC support, eight-channel memory at 409.6 GB/s, and 88 PCIe Gen 5 lanes make it suitable for server and workstation tasks.

Choose the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 when the workload is integer math, data encryption, or the specific Cinebench R15 multi-core test. Its 28W TDP and integrated Radeon 880M graphics make it the practical choice for mobile systems. It also wins Passmark single-thread by 5.2%, which may matter for lightly threaded daily tasks.