AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Processor N250 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents an unusual comparison: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a full suite of benchmark results, while the Intel Processor N250 has no recorded scores in the database. This means a direct head-to-head numerical comparison is impossible from the available measurements. The Ryzen AI 9 365's benchmark scores stand on their own, however, and they can be interpreted against the broader database of CPUs.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 delivers a multi-core Cinebench R23 score of 18,698 points and a single-core score of 1,992 points. In Cinebench R15, it achieves 2,842 points multi-core and 303 points single-core. Geekbench results show 13,760 points multi-core and 2,253 points single-core. These figures place the chip in the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 40,048.

The nearest rivals in the database provide context for this score. The AMD Ryzen 7 7700 averages 40,081 points, a delta of -0.1% relative to the Ryzen AI 9 365. The Intel Core 5 221E averages 40,144 points, a delta of -0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 9 270 averages 40,246 points, a delta of -0.5%, and the Intel Core i9-13905H averages 40,313 points, a delta of -0.7%. These deltas are all negative, meaning the Ryzen AI 9 365 trails each rival by less than one percent in average benchmark score. The data positions the Ryzen AI 9 365 in extremely close proximity to these four established desktop and mobile processors, with the differences being negligible in practice.

The Intel Processor N250 has zero benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The percentile ranking for the N250 is 50, which indicates it sits at the median of all CPUs, but this ranking appears without supporting benchmark data. The absence of scores for the N250 means no win margin can be calculated for either processor. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has all of its wins by default of having measurable results, but the data does not support claiming any specific performance advantage over the N250.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Strix Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process node at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Processor N250 uses the Twin Lake architecture, listed under the Intel Processor generation with Alder Lake-N heritage, built on a 10 nm process node at Intel. Its die size is not recorded in the database.

Core and thread counts differ sharply. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Processor N250 has 4 cores and 4 threads. This indicates the Ryzen AI 9 365 supports simultaneous multithreading while the N250 does not, a major structural difference in how each chip handles workloads.

Clock speeds show a significant spread. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Processor N250 lists a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The base clock for the N250 is unusually low in the recorded data, which may reflect a highly power-efficient idle state rather than a true operating frequency.

Cache hierarchies are organized differently. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Processor N250 has 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of shared L2 cache, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip has more total cache, but the Intel chip has a larger L1 allocation per core.

Memory support diverges as well. The Ryzen AI 9 365 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel memory bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel Processor N250 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 over a single-channel memory bus, delivering 38.4 GB/s. The AMD processor has more than double the memory bandwidth of the Intel part.

PCIe connectivity differs: the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel Processor N250 uses PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes. Both have integrated graphics, with the Ryzen AI 9 365 featuring the Radeon 880M and the N250 featuring UHD Graphics 730. Both processors are locked, with no unlocked multiplier available.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen AI 9 365 wins on raw compute capacity based on its core count, thread count, and clock speeds. With 10 cores and 20 threads, it can handle heavily threaded workloads such as video rendering, software compilation, and scientific simulations. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock gives it strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,992 points and Geekbench single-core score of 2,253 points.

The Intel Processor N250 wins on power efficiency by specification. Its 6 W TDP is far lower than the 28 W TDP of the Ryzen AI 9 365. This makes the N250 suitable for fanless or ultra-low-power designs where heat output and battery life are priorities. The single-channel memory bus and lower bandwidth reflect a design focused on lightweight tasks rather than heavy compute.

The Ryzen AI 9 365's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s gives it a clear advantage in memory-intensive applications. The dual-channel bus allows faster data movement, which matters for integrated graphics performance and data-heavy workloads. The Intel N250's 38.4 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for basic productivity but will bottleneck any serious compute task.

The Ryzen AI 9 365 also wins on platform connectivity with PCIe Gen 4 and 16 lanes, allowing faster storage and expansion devices. The Intel N250's PCIe Gen 3 with 9 lanes is adequate for entry-level systems but limits throughput for modern NVMe drives and discrete GPUs.

The database shows the Ryzen AI 9 365 in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel N250 sits at the 50th percentile. This percentile gap suggests the AMD chip is positioned for high-performance mobile computing, while the Intel chip targets the value end of the mobile spectrum.

FAQ

Q: What are the core counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Processor N250 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Processor N250 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Processor N250 has a TDP of 6 W.

Q: Which processor supports faster memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 supports 89.6 GB/s over a dual-channel memory bus. The Intel Processor N250 supports 38.4 GB/s over a single-channel memory bus.

Q: Does the database have benchmark scores for the Intel Processor N250?

A: No. The database records no benchmark scores for the Intel Processor N250, giving it an average benchmark score of zero.

Q: What process nodes are used for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel Processor N250 uses a 10 nm process node from Intel.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is a high-performance mobile processor with substantial multi-threading capability, a high boost clock, and wide memory bandwidth. Its benchmark scores place it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals are desktop-class chips like the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and the Intel Core i9-13905H, with deltas under one percent.

The Intel Processor N250 is a low-power processor designed for minimal energy consumption. Its 6 W TDP is a fraction of the Ryzen AI 9 365's 28 W, and its 4-core, 4-thread configuration handles basic workloads. The lack of benchmark data for the N250 means the database cannot confirm its real-world performance, but its specifications point to a chip intended for lightweight tasks such as web browsing, document editing, and media playback.

The choice between these two depends on the use case. The Ryzen AI 9 365 suits users who need compute density, whether for productivity applications, content creation, or multitasking. The Intel N250 suits designs where power consumption is the primary constraint, such as fanless laptops or embedded systems.

The data does not support a direct performance comparison because the N250 has no recorded scores. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has every benchmark advantage by virtue of having measurable results, but the extent of that advantage over the N250 cannot be quantified from the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Intel Processor N250 |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Cores | 10 | 4 |

| Threads | 20 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 0.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 6 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 1264 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Twin Lake |

| Codename | Strix Point | Twin Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Alder Lake-N) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5, LPDDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 38.4 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 3, 9 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2025-01-06 |

| Part Number | 100-000001530 | SRPNS |