AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core Ultra 9 288V Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core Ultra 9 288V are both mobile processors aimed at thin-and-light laptops, but the benchmark data shows a clear split in their capabilities. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the dominant multi-threaded performer, winning 12 of the 15 recorded head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V counters with superior single-thread scores and a notable win in prime number processing. The average benchmark score of 40048 for the AMD part places it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part’s 23219 average sits at the 76th percentile. This indicates that for most productivity and compute-heavy workloads, the AMD processor is the stronger choice, but the Intel chip has specific strengths in lightly-threaded tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins decisively in all multi-core and throughput-oriented benchmarks. Its largest victory is in PassMark integer math, where it scores 101831 against the Intel’s 44019, a delta of 131.3%. Data compression also heavily favors AMD, with a score of 354510 compared to Intel’s 186521, a 90.1% advantage. The Cinebench R23 multi-core test shows AMD at 18698 versus Intel’s 10178, a 83.7% lead, confirming that heavily threaded rendering workloads will complete significantly faster on the AMD chip. PassMark multithread also goes to AMD by 48.7%, with scores of 29467 and 19810 respectively.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V wins in only three recorded tests, but they are meaningful for specific use cases. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4274 beats AMD’s 3841 by 10.1%. This advantage extends to the Cinebench R15 and R23 single-core tests, though by much smaller margins of 0.5% and 2.2% respectively. The Intel chip also takes the PassMark find prime numbers test with a score of 195 against AMD’s 117, which is a 40% deficit for AMD. This suggests the Intel part excels in workloads that are highly dependent on single-core frequency and low-latency execution, such as certain legacy applications or lightly threaded game logic.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Point, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The chip has 10 cores and 20 threads, combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V uses the Lunar Lake architecture, part of the Core Ultra Series 2, and is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. It has 8 cores and 8 threads, with no hyperthreading. The base clock for Intel is higher at 3.30 GHz versus AMD’s 2.00 GHz, and the boost clock is also slightly higher at 5.10 GHz versus 5.00 GHz. The Intel TDP is 30 W compared to AMD’s 28 W.

Cache configurations differ notably. AMD provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel provides 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. While the Intel per-core L1 and L2 amounts are larger, the AMD chip has a larger total L3 pool. Memory support also diverges: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X in dual-channel mode with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel only supports LPDDR5X in dual-channel but with a higher bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s. PCIe connectivity favors Intel with Gen 5 and 4 lanes, whereas AMD offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU. Integrated graphics are the Radeon 880M for AMD and the Arc 140V for Intel.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Cinebench R23 multi-core test provides the clearest picture of the performance gap. AMD scores 18698, which is 83.7% higher than Intel’s 10178. This is a massive difference, driven by AMD’s 10 cores and 20 threads versus Intel’s 8 cores and 8 threads. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows a similar trend, with AMD at 2842 and Intel at 1583, a 79.5% delta. In single-core Cinebench R23, the gap narrows to just 2.2%, with AMD at 1992 and Intel at 1950. The R15 single-core test is nearly identical, with AMD at 303 and Intel at 301.5.

PassMark integer math is the largest single delta in the data set. AMD’s 101831 is 131.3% higher than Intel’s 44019. This indicates that AMD’s core architecture handles integer operations with far greater throughput. Data compression also shows a substantial gap, with AMD at 354510 versus Intel at 186521, a 90.1% lead. Extended instructions favor AMD by 60.8%, with scores of 25113 and 15613. Random string sorting goes to AMD by 74.4%, with 39447 against 22622.

The Intel wins are concentrated in single-thread performance. PassMark single-thread shows Intel at 4274 versus AMD’s 3841, a 10.1% advantage. The find prime numbers test is also a clear Intel win, with 195 against AMD’s 117, which represents a 40% deficit for AMD. In floating-point math, AMD wins by a smaller 5.5%, scoring 62802 versus 59536. The physics test is close, with AMD at 1704 and Intel at 1637, a 4.1% delta. Data encryption favors AMD by 29.4%, with scores of 18297 and 14141.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V scores 4274 in PassMark single-thread, which is 10.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365’s 3841.

Q: How large is the multi-core advantage for AMD?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 18698, which is 83.7% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V’s 10178.

Q: Which chip has the higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V has a memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Are there any tests where Intel wins?

A: Yes, the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V wins in PassMark single-thread, PassMark find prime numbers, and the Cinebench R15 and R23 single-core tests (by small margins).

Q: What are the process nodes for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is on a 4 nm process, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is on a 3 nm process, both from TSMC.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Intel Core Ultra 9 288V |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Cores | 10 | 8 |

| Threads | 20 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 30 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel BGA 2833 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 136.5 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 4 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | Arc 140V |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-09-23 |

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the clear choice for multi-threaded workloads. Its 20 threads deliver a 83.7% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and a 131.3% lead in PassMark integer math over the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V. For users running rendering, video encoding, data compression, or any heavily parallel task, the AMD part provides a substantial performance advantage. The AMD chip’s average benchmark score of 40048 and 87th percentile ranking also places it well above the Intel chip’s 23219 average and 76th percentile.

The Intel Core Ultra 9 288V is the better option for workloads that depend on single-thread speed. Its PassMark single-thread score of 4274 is 10.1% higher than AMD’s, and it also wins the prime number finding test. The higher memory bandwidth of 136.5 GB/s also gives Intel an edge in memory-bound scenarios. However, the overall score gap is large: the Intel chip’s average is only 58% of the AMD chip’s average. The data shows that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the more capable processor overall, with the Intel Core Ultra 9 288V serving a narrower role for specific single-thread-sensitive applications.