AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core i9-14900KS Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a complete sweep: the Intel Core i9-14900KS wins all 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, with the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 taking zero victories. This is not a close contest by any statistical measure.

The largest single-core gap appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where Intel scores 7199 against AMD's 1992, a delta of -72.3%. That means the Intel chip delivers more than 3.6 times the score in this specific test. Cinebench R15 single-core shows a similar pattern: 725 versus 303, a -58.2% delta. Geekbench single-core is the closest margin on the single-threaded side, with Intel at 2692 and AMD at 2253, a -16.3% delta. PassMark single-thread shows 4815 against 3841, a -20.2% delta.

Multi-core results widen the gap further. Cinebench R23 multi-core gives Intel 50995 points and AMD 18698, a -63.3% delta. Cinebench R15 multi-core: 5140 versus 2842, a -44.7% delta. Geekbench multi-core: 23931 versus 13760, a -42.5% delta. PassMark multithread: 60012 versus 29467, a -50.9% delta.

Specialized workloads follow the same direction. PassMark data compression: 803368 for Intel, 354510 for AMD, a -55.9% delta. Data encryption: 47717 versus 18297, a -61.7% delta. Extended instructions: 45524 versus 25113, a -44.8% delta. Find prime numbers: 244 versus 117, a -52% delta. Floating point math: 153975 versus 62802, a -59.2% delta. Integer math: 212644 versus 101831, a -52.1% delta. Physics: 3381 versus 1704, a -49.6% delta. Random string sorting: 89789 versus 39447, a -56.1% delta.

The closest overall margins are in single-threaded tests, where Intel still leads by roughly 16% to 20%. The widest margins appear in Cinebench R23 multi-core and data encryption, both exceeding 60% deltas. No workload in the database favors the AMD part.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded scores, the Intel Core i9-14900KS wins in every measured category: single-core, multi-core, math operations, encryption, compression, physics simulation, and sorting tasks. The data shows no use case where the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 takes a victory.

The AMD processor's closest showing is Geekbench single-core, where it trails by 16.3%. That indicates the Zen 5 architecture holds up reasonably in lightly threaded, short-burst workloads. However, the gap still favors Intel decisively.

For multi-threaded rendering, content creation, or any heavily parallel workload, the Intel part's advantage is substantial. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a 63.3% lead, meaning tasks like video rendering or 3D scene compilation will complete much faster on the Intel platform.

For encryption and data compression, the Intel chip leads by 61.7% and 55.9% respectively. These are typical server or workstation tasks, and the delta suggests the Intel processor is better suited for database operations, file archiving, or secure communication workloads.

The AMD processor does not win any benchmark category in the database, so there is no measured workload where it outperforms the Intel part. Its percentile rank of 87 versus Intel's 96 confirms the overall positioning: the AMD chip sits above most CPUs but below the top tier where the Intel KS model resides.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KS records an average benchmark score of 81127, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 records 40048. Intel's average is roughly double.

Q: How do the two compare in single-core performance?

A: Intel wins all single-core tests. Geekbench single-core shows 2692 versus 2253, a 16.3% lead. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 7199 versus 1992, a 72.3% lead. PassMark single-thread shows 4815 versus 3841, a 20.2% lead.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two?

A: Cinebench R23 multi-core has the largest delta at -63.3%, with Intel scoring 50995 and AMD scoring 18698. Data encryption is close behind at -61.7%.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i9-14900KS ranks in the 96th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ranks in the 87th percentile.

Q: Does the AMD processor win any benchmark?

A: No. The head-to-head results show 17 wins for Intel and 0 wins for AMD across all recorded tests.

Q: What are the closest results between the two?

A: Geekbench single-core shows the smallest delta at -16.3%. PassMark single-thread follows at -20.2%. All other tests show deltas of 42.5% or larger.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The Intel Core i9-14900KS uses 24 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses 10 cores and 20 threads. Intel's base clock is 3.20 GHz and boost clock is 6.20 GHz; AMD's base clock is 2.00 GHz and boost clock is 5.00 GHz.

Thermal design power differs substantially: Intel is rated at 150 watts, AMD at 28 watts. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700, while AMD uses AMD Socket FP8. Intel's process node is 10 nm from Intel's own foundry; AMD uses a 4 nm node from TSMC. Die size is 257 mm² for Intel and 233 mm² for AMD.

Cache configuration also differs. Both have 80 KB L1 per core. Intel has 2 MB L2 per core versus AMD's 1 MB per core. Intel has 36 MB of shared L3 cache, while AMD has 16 MB of L3.

Memory support diverges: Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Both use dual-channel memory. AMD lists memory bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s; Intel does not have a recorded bandwidth figure. Intel supports ECC memory, AMD does not.

PCIe generations differ: Intel supports Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes; AMD supports Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ: Intel uses UHD Graphics 770, AMD uses Radeon 880M. Intel has an unlocked multiplier, AMD does not. Intel's launch MSRP is $689; AMD has no recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i9-14900KS uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core i9 generation (Raptor Lake Refresh). It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses Zen 5 architecture, codename Strix Point, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. AMD's chip is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC.

The core count difference reflects a design philosophy split: Intel uses 24 full-size cores, while AMD uses 10 cores in a hybrid arrangement. Intel's L2 cache is twice as large per core at 2 MB versus 1 MB, and Intel's shared L3 is 36 MB versus AMD's 16 MB. Intel's larger cache hierarchy supports its higher thread count.

The Intel chip is a desktop part with a 150 watt TDP and an unlocked multiplier, designed for overclocking on Socket 1700. The AMD chip is a mobile part with a 28 watt TDP, designed for Socket FP8 systems, and has a locked multiplier. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, reflecting its mobile positioning.

Intel integrates UHD Graphics 770, while AMD integrates Radeon 880M. Intel supports PCIe Gen 5; AMD supports PCIe Gen 4. Intel includes ECC memory support, AMD does not. These architectural choices align with their target segments: Intel for high-power desktop workloads, AMD for power-efficient mobile systems.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear split based on platform and power requirements. The Intel Core i9-14900KS is the performance leader in every recorded benchmark, with its largest advantages in multi-core rendering, encryption, and math-intensive tasks. Its 96th percentile ranking and average score of 81127 place it among the top processors in the database. The unlocked multiplier and 150 watt TDP signal a desktop part built for maximum throughput, and the 36 MB shared L3 cache supports heavy parallel workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, with its 28 watt TDP and mobile Socket FP8, targets a different usage profile. Its 87th percentile ranking and average score of 40048 still place it above most CPUs, but it trails the Intel part by roughly half in overall performance. The 4 nm TSMC process and LPDDR5X memory support indicate a focus on power efficiency and mobile integration.

For desktop builders seeking maximum performance in rendering, compilation, or data processing, the Intel chip is the clear choice based on the benchmark results. For mobile systems where power draw and socket compatibility matter, the AMD chip provides a capable but lower-performing alternative. The 17-0 win count in head-to-head tests leaves no ambiguity about relative performance; the only question is whether the 28 watt mobile part fits the intended use case better than the 150 watt desktop part.