AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

CORE STATE Strix Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i5-14500T

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.7 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,842
2,022
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
303
252
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,698
11,790
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,992
1,838
geekbench_multicore
13,760
11,894
geekbench_singlecore
2,253
2,229
passmark_data_compression
354,510
262,417
passmark_data_encryption
18,297
15,410
passmark_extended_instructions
25,113
16,043
passmark_find_prime_numbers
117
81
passmark_floating_point_math
62,802
58,869
passmark_integer_math
101,831
80,922
passmark_multithread
29,467
22,910
passmark_physics
1,704
1,288
passmark_random_string_sorting
39,447
28,462
passmark_single_thread
3,841
3,736
passmark_singlethread
3,841
3,736
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
8,177
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,154

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core i5-14500T

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core i5-14500T represent two distinct approaches to mainstream processing, one a mobile-first Strix Point chip and the other a desktop Raptor Lake Refresh part. The recorded data shows a consistent and often substantial performance advantage for the AMD processor across every benchmark in the comparison, though the two chips have very different physical and platform characteristics.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous in its outcome. Across the 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins all 17, with the Intel Core i5-14500T recording zero victories. The margins, however, vary considerably by workload type.

The largest gap appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core testing, where the AMD chip scores 18698 against 11790 for the Intel part. That translates to a 58.6% advantage, a dominant result that indicates the Ryzen AI 9 365 is able to sustain significantly higher throughput under sustained all-core loads. The Cinebench R15 multi-core test tells a similar story, with AMD leading 2842 to 2022, a 40.6% margin. This suggests the AMD processor’s efficiency-oriented design does not come at the cost of raw multi-threaded capability.

Single-threaded performance is much closer. In the Cinebench R15 single-core test, the AMD part wins with 303 points versus 252, a 20.2% lead. In the more modern Cinebench R23 single-core test, the gap narrows to 8.4%, with AMD scoring 1992 to Intel’s 1838. Geekbench single-core results show an even tighter race: 2253 for AMD versus 2229 for Intel, a margin of just 1.1%. PassMark single-thread testing likewise shows a narrow 2.8% lead for AMD, with scores of 3841 and 3736. These results indicate that while the AMD chip has the edge in lightly threaded work, the Intel part remains competitive in that domain.

The PassMark suite reveals where the AMD architecture pulls ahead most decisively. In PassMark extended instructions, AMD scores 25113 against 16043, a 56.5% advantage. PassMark find prime numbers shows AMD at 117 versus 81, a 44.4% lead. PassMark random string sorting goes to AMD by 38.6%, with scores of 39447 and 28462. These are computationally intensive workloads that often respond well to a combination of high clock speeds and efficient instruction handling, and the data shows the Zen 5 implementation is substantially stronger here.

Memory and encryption tests also favor AMD. PassMark data compression shows AMD at 354510 versus 262417, a 35.1% lead. PassMark data encryption goes to AMD 18297 to 15410, an 18.7% margin. PassMark integer math shows AMD at 101831 against 80922, a 25.8% advantage, while floating point math is closer at 62802 versus 58869, a 6.7% lead. PassMark physics results show AMD at 1704 versus 1288, a 32.3% margin, and PassMark multithread scores of 29467 versus 22910 give AMD a 28.6% lead.

The overall average benchmark score places the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 at 40048, with a percentile rank of 87 against all CPUs. The Intel Core i5-14500T has an average benchmark score of 28065 and a percentile rank of 80. The AMD processor’s nearest rival in the database is the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, which scores 40081, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the two are effectively tied. Other close rivals include the Intel Core 5 221E at 40144 (-0.2%) and the AMD Ryzen 9 270 at 40246 (-0.5%). The Intel Core i5-14500T, by contrast, sits near the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE, which scores 28054 with a delta of 0%, and the Intel Core i9-12900H at 28003 with a delta of 0.2%. These nearest-rival comparisons show that the two chips occupy very different performance tiers in the database, with the AMD part competing against much stronger processors.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins decisively, scoring 18698 against 11790 for the Intel Core i5-14500T. This is a 58.6% advantage.

Q: How close is single-threaded performance?

A: The AMD chip leads in every single-thread test, but margins are small. Cinebench R23 single-core shows 1992 versus 1838 (8.4%), while Geekbench single-core is nearly tied at 2253 versus 2229 (1.1%). PassMark single-thread shows 3841 versus 3736 (2.8%).

Q: What are the biggest performance gaps?

A: The largest gaps are in Cinebench R23 multi-core (58.6%), PassMark extended instructions (56.5%), and PassMark find prime numbers (44.4%). All favor the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14500T compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel part is closely matched with the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE, which has an average score of 28054 and a delta of 0%, and the Intel Core i9-12900H at 28003 with a delta of 0.2%. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, by contrast, sits near the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with a delta of -0.1%.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ranks in the 87th percentile against all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-14500T ranks in the 80th percentile.

Q: Does the Intel processor have any benchmark wins?

A: No. The recorded head-to-head data shows the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins all 17 comparisons, with the Intel Core i5-14500T recording zero wins.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the faster processor in every measured workload, with the largest margins in multi-threaded and instruction-heavy tasks. Its 58.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 56.5% lead in PassMark extended instructions show a substantial capability gap. The Intel Core i5-14500T remains competitive only in single-threaded tests, where its 1.1% deficit in Geekbench single-core shows it can nearly match the AMD part.

The Intel chip does have its own attributes, including ECC memory support and a desktop socket, but the benchmark data does not show any performance area where it takes the lead. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 also has a higher average benchmark score of 40048 versus 28065, and a higher percentile ranking of 87 versus 80. For workloads that stress multi-core throughput or extended instruction sets, the AMD processor is the stronger choice according to the recorded data. For users who need single-threaded performance, the difference is small enough that either chip could serve, but the AMD part still comes out ahead.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ significantly in their core configurations. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Thermal design power also differs: the AMD processor is rated at 28 W, while the Intel processor is rated at 35 W.

The sockets are incompatible. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD chip is listed with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel chip has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. ECC memory support differs as well, with the AMD chip not supporting it and the Intel chip supporting it. PCIe capabilities also differ: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

The integrated graphics differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Radeon 880M, while the Intel Core i5-14500T uses UHD Graphics 770. The AMD chip has a die size of 233 mm², while the Intel chip has a die size of 215 mm². The Intel processor has a launch MSRP of $232. The AMD processor has no recorded launch MSRP. The AMD part was released on 2024-06-30, while the Intel part was released on 2024-01-07. Both processors are currently active in production and both have locked multipliers.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Point, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation that uses a combination of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14500T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series, and is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel. The Intel part belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation.

Cache configurations differ between the two. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core but has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 cache on the Intel part may help in certain workloads, but the benchmark data shows the AMD chip still wins in all recorded tests.

The AMD part is a mobile processor, while the Intel part is a desktop processor. The AMD chip uses a hybrid core arrangement within its Zen 5 generation, combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, while the Intel chip is based on Raptor Lake Refresh. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they are not intended for overclocking. The AMD chip uses a dual-channel memory bus, as does the Intel chip, but the AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, a figure not available for the Intel part.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 365
i5-14500T
Core Specs
Cores
10
14 +40.0%
Threads
20
20 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
1.7 -15.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
4.8 -4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
1.7 -15.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
4.8 -4.0%
Multiplier
20
17 -15.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
35 +25.0%
PL1
—
35 W
PL2
—
92 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Strix Point
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
215 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 6
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
1200 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 880M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$232
Part Number
100-000001530
SRN3P
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
Bundled Cooler
—
None
View Ryzen AI 9 365 Details View Core i5-14500T Details