AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core i5-110 occupy different corners of the processor market, one a high-end mobile part built on a leading-edge node, the other a desktop chip from an older process generation. The database shows a substantial gap in both architectural approach and measured performance, with the Ryzen part dominating across every recorded benchmark while the Intel part enters the comparison with no recorded scores of its own.

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts differ between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What process nodes are used by each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses Intel's 14 nm process node.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 boosts to 5.00 GHz, compared to the Intel Core i5-110 which boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 memory.

Q: What is the market segment for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is classified as a Mobile processor, while the Intel Core i5-110 is classified as a Desktop processor.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-110 have any recorded benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-110 has an empty benchmark array and an average benchmark score of 0, whereas the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 17 recorded scores.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is stark. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-110, in contrast, uses the Comet Lake architecture, which is the same as its codename, built on Intel's 14 nm process. This represents a generation gap of several process nodes, which explains much of the efficiency and performance difference.

The AMD part pairs 10 cores with 20 threads, a configuration that relies on a hybrid arrangement of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel part offers 6 cores and 12 threads in a more conventional homogeneous layout. Cache hierarchies also differ: the AMD chip provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory architecture is a further differentiator. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X across a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 on a dual-channel bus with 42.7 GB/s of bandwidth, less than half the AMD figure. PCIe connectivity also differs, with AMD offering Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes and Intel offering Gen 3 with 16 CPU lanes. The AMD chip integrates Radeon 880M graphics, while the Intel chip integrates UHD Graphics 630.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark comparison is one-sided, but it requires careful reading. The official head-to-head array in the database is empty, and winsA and winsB are both recorded as 0. However, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a full suite of 17 recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel Core i5-110 has none. This means the database contains no direct comparative measurements, and the Intel chip cannot be positioned against the AMD chip on any specific test.

What the data does show is the AMD part's absolute performance profile. In Cinebench R23, it records 18698 points in multi-core and 1992 points in single-core. In Cinebench R15, it records 2842 multi-core and 303 single-core. Geekbench results show 13760 multi-core and 2253 single-core. PassMark tests cover a wide range: 354510 in data compression, 18297 in data encryption, 25113 in extended instructions, 117 in find prime numbers, 62802 in floating point math, 101831 in integer math, 29467 in multithread, 1704 in physics, 39447 in random string sorting, and 3841 in single-thread tests.

The Intel Core i5-110 sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 due to missing data. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 sits at the 87th percentile with an average benchmark score of 40048. The nearest rivals to the AMD chip are the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 at 40081 average score (0.1% lower), the Intel Core 5 221E at 40144 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 at 40246 (0.5% lower), and the Intel Core i9-13905H at 40313 (0.7% lower). These deltas place the Ryzen AI 9 365 within a tight performance band around those four parts, all of which score within 1% of each other.

Specification Differences

The recorded specifications differ on nearly every measurable field. Core count is 10 versus 6, threads are 20 versus 12. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz versus 2.90 GHz, a reversal where the older Intel part starts at a higher frequency. Boost clocks favor AMD, 5.00 GHz versus 4.30 GHz. TDP is 28 watts for AMD versus 65 watts for Intel. Sockets differ entirely: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1200.

Process node is 4 nm versus 14 nm, and the foundry is TSMC versus Intel. Die size is recorded only for AMD at 233 mm², with no figure for Intel. L1 cache per core is 80 KB versus 64 KB, L2 per core is 1 MB versus 256 KB, and L3 is 16 MB versus 12 MB shared. Memory support is DDR5 and LPDDR5X versus DDR4. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s. PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes versus Gen 3 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics are Radeon 880M versus UHD Graphics 630. Market segment is Mobile versus Desktop. Release dates are 2024-06-30 versus 2025-09-10. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $200. Neither part has an unlocked multiplier, and neither supports ECC memory.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins in every category where the database records a comparison. Its 10-core, 20-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 16 MB of L3 cache provides a structural advantage over the 6-core, 12-thread Intel part with a 4.30 GHz boost and 12 MB of L3. The 4 nm process node versus 14 nm gives it a major efficiency lead, reflected in the 28 watt TDP against the Intel part's 65 watt TDP. Memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s versus 42.7 GB/s means the AMD chip can feed its cores at more than double the rate.

The Intel Core i5-110 does hold advantages in specific specification fields. Its base clock is higher at 2.90 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, which can matter in lightly threaded workloads that do not boost. Its launch MSRP of $200 provides a reference point for its positioning, though the database records no benchmark data to establish its actual performance. Its DDR4 support may be relevant for users with existing DDR4 platforms, and its Intel Socket 1200 compatibility aligns with a different installed base than AMD Socket FP8. The desktop market segment also means it is intended for a different physical use case than the mobile-oriented AMD part.

For use-case allocation based strictly on recorded data, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the choice for multi-threaded workloads, single-thread performance, memory-intensive tasks, and any scenario where the 87th percentile standing and 40048 average benchmark score apply. The Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark wins, so it cannot be positioned as a performance leader in any tested category. Its higher base clock is a specification advantage, but no measured score confirms a real-world win.

The Verdict

The database presents a clear hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 records 17 benchmark scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark suites, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 40048. The Intel Core i5-110 records zero benchmarks, holds a 50th percentile ranking, and has an average score of 0. For anyone selecting between these two based on the available data, the AMD part is the only one with measured performance evidence.

The AMD chip's nearest rivals all score within 0.7% of it: the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, Intel Core 5 221E, AMD Ryzen 9 270, and Intel Core i9-13905H. This indicates the Ryzen AI 9 365 performs in the same band as those mid-range and upper-mid-range parts, none of which include the Intel Core i5-110. The Intel part's 50th percentile placement suggests it sits at the median of the CPU population, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot quantify its performance against the AMD chip.

The specification sheets tell a consistent story. The AMD part has more cores, more threads, a higher boost clock, more cache, faster memory support, more bandwidth, a newer PCIe generation, and a far more advanced process node. The Intel part has a higher base clock, a higher TDP, an older socket, DDR4 support, and a desktop form factor. The launch MSRP of $200 for the Intel part is the only cost data in the database, and it is not accompanied by any performance validation.

For a mobile workload, the Ryzen AI 9 365 delivers a 28 watt TDP with high-end benchmark scores. For a desktop workload, the Core i5-110 offers a 65 watt part with no recorded scores. The data supports choosing the AMD processor for any measured performance requirement. The Intel processor remains an unquantified option, specified but not benchmarked. The verdict from the database is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the superior part in every recorded metric, and the Intel Core i5-110 cannot be compared on performance because no performance data exists for it.