AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 7 253PTE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

CORE STATE Strix Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 253PTE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.8 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,842
2,144
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
303
302
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,698
21,276
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,992
3,003
geekbench_multicore
13,760
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
2,253
N/A
passmark_data_compression
354,510
275,828
passmark_data_encryption
18,297
15,500
passmark_extended_instructions
25,113
17,099
passmark_find_prime_numbers
117
82
passmark_floating_point_math
62,802
67,209
passmark_integer_math
101,831
119,552
passmark_multithread
29,467
25,031
passmark_physics
1,704
1,318
passmark_random_string_sorting
39,447
28,227
passmark_single_thread
3,841
3,794
passmark_singlethread
3,841
3,794
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
8,935
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,261

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 7 253PTE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data splits these two processors into distinct performance personalities. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins 11 of the 15 recorded head-to-head comparisons, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE takes 4. The margins, however, tell a more nuanced story than the raw win count.

The AMD part's largest victory comes in PassMark extended instructions, where it scores 25113 against Intel's 17099, a 46.9% advantage. That is a massive gap for compute-heavy instruction workloads. The Ryzen also dominates prime number finding, scoring 117 versus 82, a 42.7% lead. Random string sorting goes AMD's way by 39.7% (39447 vs 28227), and Cinebench R15 multicore favors AMD by 32.6% (2842 vs 2144). Data compression sees AMD ahead by 28.5% (354510 vs 275828), physics by 29.3% (1704 vs 1318), and multithread by 17.7% (29467 vs 25031). Data encryption adds an 18% win (18297 vs 15500). Single-thread PassMark is close, with AMD ahead by just 1.2% (3841 vs 3794), and Cinebench R15 single-core is nearly identical, 303 vs 302.

The Intel Core 7 253PTE counters with its own decisive results. Cinebench R23 single-core is the largest swing, with Intel scoring 3003 versus AMD's 1992, a 33.7% lead. That is a commanding single-thread advantage in modern rendering workloads. Cinebench R23 multicore also goes to Intel, 21276 vs 18698, a 12.1% margin. In PassMark integer math, Intel leads by 14.8% (119552 vs 101831), and floating-point math goes Intel's way by 6.6% (67209 vs 62802).

The overall average benchmark scores reflect these splits. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 holds an average score of 40048, while the Intel Core 7 253PTE sits at 34962. The database places AMD in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, with Intel at the 84th percentile. AMD's nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, scores 40081 for a delta of -0.1%, and the Intel part's closest competitor, the Intel Core i7-13800H, scores 34988, also a -0.1% delta. The two processors occupy similar overall performance tiers despite their divergent workload strengths.

Architecture Differences

The two chips approach their 10-core, 20-thread configurations from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation that mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 7 253PTE comes from the Bartlett Lake codename in the Core 7 generation, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. Both parts share an 80 KB L1 per core, but AMD allocates 1 MB L2 per core while Intel doubles that to 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is where Intel takes a clear structural lead: AMD provides 16 MB total, while Intel offers 33 MB shared. That larger L3 pool likely contributes to Intel's strong Cinebench R23 results, which benefit from larger working sets staying resident in cache.

Memory support separates the two as well. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both run dual-channel memory with identical 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory is available on the Intel part but not on the AMD chip. PCIe generations differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Clock speeds favor Intel on boost. The AMD part runs a 2.00 GHz base clock with a 5.00 GHz boost, while Intel runs 1.80 GHz base but boosts to 5.40 GHz. The Intel part's higher boost clock aligns with its single-thread victories. Thermal design power moves in the opposite direction: AMD is rated at 28 W, Intel at 45 W, a substantial power envelope difference that reflects the Intel part's desktop market segment versus AMD's mobile positioning.

Integrated graphics also differ. AMD uses the Radeon 880M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part targets mobile use with an AMD Socket FP8, while Intel uses Socket 1700 and is classified as a desktop processor. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $384. AMD's launch MSRP is not recorded in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark comparisons?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins 11 of the 15 head-to-head tests, with the Intel Core 7 253PTE winning the remaining 4.

Q: Where does the Intel Core 7 253PTE show its biggest advantage?

A: Intel leads by 33.7% in Cinebench R23 single-core (3003 vs 1992) and by 12.1% in Cinebench R23 multicore (21276 vs 18698). It also wins PassMark integer math by 14.8% and floating-point math by 6.6%.

Q: How does AMD dominate in PassMark extended instructions?

A: AMD scores 25113 against Intel's 17099, a 46.9% lead. This is the largest margin in any recorded benchmark between the two.

Q: What are the cache differences?

A: Both have 80 KB L1 per core. AMD uses 1 MB L2 per core and 16 MB L3, while Intel uses 2 MB L2 per core and 33 MB shared L3.

Q: Do the processors support the same memory types?

A: No. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both run dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports ECC memory; AMD does not.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: AMD runs a 2.00 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. Intel runs a 1.80 GHz base and 5.40 GHz boost. Intel's higher boost aligns with its single-thread benchmark wins.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear workload split. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the stronger choice for instruction-heavy, data-intensive tasks: encryption, compression, sorting, physics, and extended instruction execution all favor AMD by wide margins. Its 28 W TDP and mobile socket placement indicate a design aimed at efficient, portable computing where those workloads matter.

The Intel Core 7 253PTE is the better option for single-thread performance and modern rendering workloads. Its 33.7% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and 12.1% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore show a processor that excels in current-generation rendering engines. The larger 33 MB L3 cache and higher 5.40 GHz boost clock support that profile. The 45 W TDP and desktop socket reflect a part built for sustained plugged-in performance.

The overall average scores place AMD at 40048 versus Intel's 34962, a 14.5% gap in AMD's favor. The 87th versus 84th percentile ranking confirms AMD holds a modest edge in aggregate. However, the Intel part's Cinebench R23 results, both single and multi-core, are the strongest individual metrics in the comparison. A buyer targeting rendering workloads should favor the Intel chip, while a user prioritizing encryption, compression, sorting, and general multithreaded throughput should favor the AMD part.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Intel Core 7 253PTE |

|---|---|---|

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Strix Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 7 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| ECC Memory | false | true |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $384 |

| Part Number | 100-000001530 | SA4QK |

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 365
7 253PTE
Core Specs
Cores
10
10 0.0%
Threads
20
20 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
1.8 -10.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.4 +8.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
1.8 -10.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.4 +8.0%
Multiplier
20
18 -10.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
45 +60.7%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Strix Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 7 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 6
—
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
—
P-Core Turbo
—
5.2 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 880M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$384
Part Number
100-000001530
SA4QK
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 9 365 Details View Core 7 253PTE Details