AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 7 251TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a clear split between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and the Intel Core 7 251TE, with Intel claiming 10 of 15 head-to-head wins but AMD taking several decisive victories in specific workloads. The most dramatic single result is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where Intel wins by 44.7%, scoring 3602 against AMD's 1992. That gap is far larger than any other single-threaded difference in the recorded tests. Cinebench R15 single-core shows a similar but smaller Intel advantage at 16.3%, with scores of 362 versus 303.

Multi-threaded rendering tells a different story depending on the test version. In Cinebench R23 multicore, Intel wins decisively with 25518 against AMD's 18698, a 26.7% margin. However, in Cinebench R15 multicore, AMD takes the win with 2842 versus 2572, a 10.5% advantage. The two Cinebench versions disagree on which processor is faster under full load, which suggests the workloads scale differently across the two architectures.

AMD's biggest win comes in PassMark extended instructions, where it scores 25113 against Intel's 16974, a 47.9% advantage. This is the largest delta in either direction across all tests. AMD also leads in PassMark data compression (354510 versus 334399, a 6% win) and PassMark single-thread (3841 versus 3568, a 7.7% win). The single-thread PassMark result runs counter to the Cinebench single-core results, where Intel led by wide margins.

Intel's wins are spread across arithmetic and physics workloads. PassMark floating point math shows Intel at 85607 versus AMD's 62802, a 26.6% lead. PassMark integer math gives Intel 125739 against AMD's 101831, a 19% advantage. PassMark find prime numbers favors Intel at 140 versus 117, a 16.4% margin. PassMark data encryption goes to Intel with 22176 against 18297, a 17.5% win. PassMark physics puts Intel ahead at 1938 versus 1704, a 12.1% difference.

The closer margins appear in mixed workloads. PassMark multithread gives Intel only a 1.8% edge (30022 versus 29467). PassMark random string sorting is nearly tied, with Intel ahead by just 0.5% (39643 versus 39447). These two results indicate that in certain throughput-oriented tasks, the two processors are effectively equivalent despite their different core configurations.

Overall average benchmark scores place Intel slightly ahead at 41650 versus AMD's 40048, a difference of about 4%. Intel's percentile ranking among all CPUs is 88, compared to AMD's 87. The nearest rivals in the database for AMD include the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 (average score 40081, a 0.1% gap), the Intel Core 5 221E (40144, 0.2% gap), and the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40246, 0.5% gap). Intel's closest competitors are the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H (41621, 0.1% gap), the Intel Core i7-14650HX (41576, 0.2% gap), and the Intel Core i7-12850HX (41779, a 0.3% gap in Intel's favor).

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is strongest in instruction-heavy and data-oriented workloads. Its 47.9% lead in extended instructions points to a processor that handles SIMD-style or specialized instruction sets with notable efficiency. The 6% win in data compression suggests file archiving or database-style compression tasks will complete faster on AMD hardware. The 7.7% PassMark single-thread advantage, while contradicted by Cinebench single-core, indicates that some single-threaded office or web workloads will favor AMD.

The Intel Core 7 251TE dominates in rendering and numerical computation. The 26.7% lead in Cinebench R23 multicore and the 26.6% lead in floating point math make it the clear choice for 3D rendering, scientific simulation, or any workload that relies heavily on floating-point arithmetic. The 19% lead in integer math covers general productivity and code compilation. The 17.5% data encryption advantage matters for disk encryption, VPN throughput, or secure communication workloads. The 16.4% lead in prime number finding favors cryptography or number-theory applications.

The near-ties in PassMark multithread (1.8% difference) and random string sorting (0.5% difference) define a middle ground where neither processor has a meaningful edge. Users running mixed server-style workloads, database sorting, or general parallel tasks will see similar performance from both. The Cinebench R15 multicore result, where AMD leads by 10.5%, adds nuance: older or differently-scaled rendering workloads may actually favor AMD, even though the newer R23 version clearly favors Intel.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split by workload type. For rendering, numerical simulation, encryption, and integer-heavy computation, the Intel Core 7 251TE is the stronger processor. Its Cinebench R23 multicore lead of 26.7% and floating point math lead of 26.6% are substantial margins that will translate into visible time savings in batch rendering or long-running scientific jobs. The 17.5% encryption advantage also makes it the better pick for security-conscious deployments.

For data compression, specialized instruction execution, and light single-threaded tasks, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins. The 47.9% extended instructions lead is the single largest performance gap in the entire comparison, and the 6% data compression win will matter for backup tools or database workloads. The 7.7% PassMark single-thread edge, while modest, means everyday responsiveness in some applications will favor AMD.

Users who need a balanced processor for mixed workloads face a closer call. The average benchmark scores differ by only 4%, and the PassMark multithread and string sorting tests show near-parity. In that context, the deciding factor is which specific applications dominate the workload mix. The Intel chip is the safer choice for compute-heavy tasks, while AMD holds the advantage in data-centric and instruction-extension workloads. The Intel Core 7 251TE carries a launch MSRP of $384; no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 24 cores and 32 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor wins in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE wins with a score of 25518 versus AMD's 18698, a 26.7% advantage.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has 36 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 does not.

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 7 251TE has an average benchmark score of 41650, compared to the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 at 40048.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses a Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, built under the Strix Point codename. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 7 251TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm Intel process, belonging to the Core 7 generation. The die sizes are similar, at 233 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel, but the manufacturing processes differ by node generation.

Core counts diverge sharply. AMD's 10 cores and 20 threads rely on a smaller core count with higher per-core efficiency. Intel's 24 cores and 32 threads provide far more parallel execution units. The base clocks also differ, with AMD at 2.00 GHz and Intel at 1.40 GHz, but Intel's boost clock reaches 5.40 GHz versus AMD's 5.00 GHz. The power envelopes are distinct as well, with AMD rated at 28 W TDP and Intel at 45 W TDP.

Cache hierarchies follow different patterns. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core. AMD provides 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3. Intel provides 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3. The larger L3 cache on Intel likely contributes to its lead in several multi-threaded tests, while AMD's more efficient core design helps in instruction-heavy workloads.

Memory support differs in breadth. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with identical peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is available only on the Intel part. PCIe connectivity also differs, with AMD using Gen 4 across 16 lanes and Intel using Gen 5 across 16 lanes.

The integrated graphics solutions are different tiers. AMD uses the Radeon 880M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 770. The market segments also differ, with AMD labeled as Mobile and Intel as Desktop. Socket compatibility reflects this split, with AMD using Socket FP8 and Intel using Socket 1700. The AMD part launches in the Ryzen AI 300 generation with a release date in mid-2024, while Intel's Bartlett Lake part launches in early 2025.