AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 7 150UL Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core 7 150UL are both 10-core mobile processors, but they represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The Ryzen AI 9 365 is a high-performance part built on a modern 4 nm process, while the Core 7 150UL is a low-power desktop-oriented chip using an older Intel process. The database shows a clear performance gap between them, driven by differences in thread count, cache hierarchy, and integrated graphics. This analysis breaks down the recorded specifications and benchmark data to clarify where each processor stands.

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts compare between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and the Intel Core 7 150UL?

A: Both processors have exactly 10 cores. The AMD part supports 20 threads, while the Intel part supports 12 threads, meaning the Ryzen AI 9 365 can process nearly twice as many concurrent threads.

Q: What is the difference in boost clock speed?

A: Both processors share the same maximum boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The base clock differs, with the AMD chip at 2.00 GHz and the Intel chip at 1.70 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a smaller manufacturing process node?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core 7 150UL uses a 10 nm process from Intel, which is a significantly older and larger node.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 150UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the performance percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 150UL ranks in the 50th percentile, indicating a substantial difference in overall performance.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory only.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two chips is substantial. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Point, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation. This is a hybrid design that uses both Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, which is why it can offer 10 cores and 20 threads. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, which is a key factor in its performance per watt. The die size is recorded at 233 mm².

The Intel Core 7 150UL is based on the older Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS generation. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel. While it also has 10 cores, it only supports 12 threads, indicating a mix of performance and efficient cores, but with a lower thread count than the AMD chip. Its L2 cache is larger per core at 1.25 MB, but its shared L3 cache is smaller at 12 MB.

Both processors use an integrated graphics solution. The AMD chip integrates the Radeon 880M, while the Intel chip uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The AMD part also has a dual-channel memory bus with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, whereas the Intel chip has a dual-channel bus but no recorded bandwidth figure in the database. Memory support differs as well: the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. The Intel part is classified as a desktop market segment chip on Socket 1700, while the AMD part is a mobile chip on AMD Socket FP8.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 7 150UL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a full suite of results. This makes a direct comparison one-sided. The recorded data shows that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 delivers strong multi-threaded performance, scoring 18,698 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 13,760 in Geekbench multi-core. Its single-core results are also solid, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,992 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,253.

In the PassMark suite, the AMD chip shows its strengths in specific workloads. It scores 354,510 in data compression, 101,831 in integer math, and 62,802 in floating point math. Its multithread score is 29,467, and its single-thread score is 3,841. These numbers indicate a processor that is well-suited for both productivity and content creation tasks.

Without any benchmark data for the Intel Core 7 150UL, the database cannot provide a direct score comparison. However, the percentile rankings are telling. The AMD part is in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. This difference in percentile ranking suggests that the AMD chip is far ahead of the Intel chip in overall performance, based on the aggregate of all recorded benchmarks for each part.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specification fields. The most significant differences are in thread count, process node, and cache configuration.

• Threads: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 150UL has 12 threads.
• Base Clock: The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.70 GHz.
• Boost Clock: Both are listed at 5.00 GHz.
• TDP: The AMD chip has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel chip has a TDP of 15 watts.
• Process Node: The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process. The Intel chip uses a 10 nm process.
• Foundry: The AMD chip is made by TSMC. The Intel chip is made by Intel.
• L2 Cache: The AMD chip has 1 MB per core. The Intel chip has 1.25 MB per core.
• L3 Cache: The AMD chip has 16 MB. The Intel chip has 12 MB (shared).
• Memory Support: The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory Bandwidth: The AMD chip has a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip has no recorded value.
• PCIe Lanes: The AMD chip has Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip has Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).
• Integrated Graphics: The AMD chip uses Radeon 880M. The Intel chip uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.
• Socket: The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700.
• Market Segment: The AMD chip is classified as Mobile. The Intel chip is classified as Desktop.
• Die Size: The AMD chip has a die size of 233 mm². The Intel chip has no recorded die size.

Where Each One Wins

The data shows that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins in virtually every measurable category. Its higher thread count and larger L3 cache give it a clear advantage in multi-threaded workloads. The benchmark scores confirm this: the AMD chip scores 18,698 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 29,467 in PassMark multithread. These results suggest it is the better choice for video rendering, software compilation, and other tasks that scale with parallel processing.

The AMD chip also wins on efficiency per clock in single-threaded tasks, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2,253 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3,841. Its smaller 4 nm process node contributes to its performance advantage. The Intel Core 7 150UL has no recorded wins in the benchmark data, as it has no scores to compare. Its only potential advantage is its lower 15-watt TDP, which could be relevant for systems where power draw is a strict constraint. It also supports DDR4 memory, which may be useful in systems with existing memory infrastructure.

The Intel chip is classified as a desktop part, which may make it easier to integrate into certain existing motherboard platforms using Socket 1700. However, from a pure performance standpoint, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 dominates. The AMD chip also has a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which supports its faster integrated graphics and general system responsiveness.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the clear performer based on the recorded data. It offers 20 threads, a 4 nm process, and a 16 MB L3 cache, which translates into top-tier benchmark results. Its 87th percentile ranking confirms that it is a high-end mobile processor. The Intel Core 7 150UL, with its 12 threads, 10 nm process, and 50th percentile ranking, is a mid-range part with no recorded benchmark scores to challenge the AMD chip.

For users who need maximum multi-threaded performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the right choice. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,698 and PassMark multithread score of 29,467 are strong indicators of its capability in demanding applications. The Intel Core 7 150UL may be better suited for low-power desktop builds where the 15-watt TDP is a priority, but it cannot match the AMD part in raw performance. The data is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the superior processor for almost any workload.