AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data presents an asymmetric comparison. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a full suite of benchmark results across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests. The Intel Core 7 150HL, in contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This means every measurable performance win belongs to the AMD processor, simply because it is the only one with data.

Within the AMD's own results, its strongest relative performances appear in specific workload types. The Passmark data compression score of 354,510 is far above its other integer-based results, indicating a specialized strength in compression workloads. Its Passmark integer math score of 101,831 and floating point math score of 62,802 also stand out as high absolute values. The single-thread Passmark score of 3,841 shows a solid per-core capability, while the multithread score of 29,467 reflects the combined throughput of its 10 cores and 20 threads.

The Intel Core 7 150HL cannot be placed in any workload category based on measurements because the database contains no scores for it. Its percentile rank of 50 across all CPUs is the only performance-related figure, and that is a relative standing rather than a measured workload result. The AMD part sits at the 87th percentile. The Intel processor's average benchmark score is recorded as zero, confirming an absence of test data.

For the AMD chip, the single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1,992 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,253 indicate that lightly threaded tasks are handled well, but the larger multi-core scores (18,698 in Cinebench R23, 13,760 in Geekbench multi) show that scaling to all threads is where the processor builds its lead. The Passmark physics score of 1,704 is comparatively modest, while the extended instructions score of 25,113 suggests decent SIMD throughput.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the only processor with demonstrated performance. It records a 87th percentile standing among all CPUs, an average benchmark score of 40,048, and 16 separate workload measurements. The Intel Core 7 150HL has a 50th percentile, an average score of zero, and no benchmark entries.

The verdict for any system builder is straightforward: if measured performance matters, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the only option with evidence in the database. The Intel part's lack of scores means no workload advantage can be attributed to it. Users prioritizing a processor with verified multi-core throughput, single-core speed, and encryption or compression results would select the AMD. The Intel Core 7 150HL offers a higher core count (14 versus 10) and a higher base clock (2.40 GHz versus 2.00 GHz), but without recorded scores those specifications do not translate into measurable wins.

The AMD part also uses a smaller process node (4 nm versus 10 nm), which typically correlates with efficiency, and it has a lower TDP of 28 watts against Intel's 45 watts. Those figures come from the specification fields, not from benchmark results, but they align with the AMD processor being the more measured performer.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors. That field is empty. With no direct comparison tests recorded, the only available performance analysis comes from the AMD's standalone scores and the Intel's absence of them.

The AMD's largest recorded wins are internal to its own test suite. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,698 is roughly 9.4 times its single-core score of 1,992, showing strong thread scaling. Its Geekbench multi-core score of 13,760 is about 6.1 times its single-core score of 2,253. The Passmark multithread score of 29,467 versus single-thread of 3,841 gives a ratio of about 7.7. These ratios indicate the processor effectively uses its 20 threads.

In the absence of Intel scores, no delta percentages can be computed. The nearest rivals for the AMD part are listed in the database: the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 (average score 40,081, delta -0.1%), the Intel Core 5 221E (40,144, -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 (40,246, -0.5%), and the Intel Core i9-13905H (40,313, -0.7%). These show the Ryzen AI 9 365 sits within 1% of those four processors in average benchmark score, despite having a lower core count than some of them. That near-parity with the Ryzen 7 7700 and Core i9-13905H suggests the 10-core, 20-thread AMD design competes well against higher-core-count parts in the same database.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 7 150HL have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the Intel Core 7 150HL, and its average benchmark score is recorded as 0.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ranks at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core 7 150HL ranks at the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: Both processors have a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a higher base clock at 2.40 GHz, compared to the AMD's 2.00 GHz.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core 7 150HL uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural families. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Point, part of the Ryzen AI 300 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC and has a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 7 150HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-PS, part of the Core 7 generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Cache structures differ. Both list 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD and 2 MB per core on the Intel. The L3 cache is 16 MB on the AMD versus 24 MB shared on the Intel. Neither supports 3D V-Cache. Neither supports ECC memory.

Memory support also differs. The AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. The AMD uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.

PCIe lanes differ: the AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are different as well: the AMD has a Radeon 880M, and the Intel has Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, a base clock of 2.00 GHz, a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads, a base clock of 2.40 GHz, a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, and a TDP of 45 watts.

The AMD is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with no die size recorded. L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD versus 2 MB per core on the Intel. L3 cache is 16 MB on the AMD versus 24 MB shared on the Intel.

Memory support: the AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the Intel has no bandwidth figure. The AMD has 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only); the Intel has 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only).

The sockets differ: AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD, Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel. The AMD's integrated graphics is Radeon 880M, while the Intel uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The AMD's market segment is Mobile, and the Intel's is Desktop. Both are active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The AMD released on 2024-06-30, while the Intel released on 2024-04-07. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded in the database. The AMD has a part number of 100-000001530, while the Intel's part number is listed as unknown.