AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 5 223PTE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

CORE STATE Strix Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 223PTE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.3 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,842
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
303
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
18,698
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,992
N/A
geekbench_multicore
13,760
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
2,253
N/A
passmark_data_compression
354,510
N/A
passmark_data_encryption
18,297
N/A
passmark_extended_instructions
25,113
N/A
passmark_find_prime_numbers
117
N/A
passmark_floating_point_math
62,802
N/A
passmark_integer_math
101,831
N/A
passmark_multithread
29,467
N/A
passmark_physics
1,704
N/A
passmark_random_string_sorting
39,447
N/A
passmark_single_thread
3,841
N/A
passmark_singlethread
3,841
N/A

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 5 223PTE

AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 5 223PTE

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains a full suite of benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, but the Intel Core 5 223PTE currently has no recorded benchmark scores. This makes a direct score-for-score comparison impossible. The AMD part shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18698 and a single-core score of 1992. In Geekbench, it records a multi-core score of 13760 and a single-core score of 2253. The absence of any Intel results means the data cannot confirm a single head-to-head win for either processor in any specific test.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 holds an average benchmark score of 40048 across all recorded tests. Its nearest rival in the database is the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, which averages 40081, a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core 5 223PTE shows an average benchmark score of 0, placing it at the 50th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the AMD chip sits at the 87th percentile. With no Intel scores recorded, the data indicates that the AMD processor currently dominates the measurable performance landscape in this comparison.

PassMark results for the AMD part show a multi-thread score of 29467 and a single-thread score of 3841. Integer math reaches 101831, while floating point math hits 62802. Data encryption scores 18297, and extended instructions reach 25113. These numbers provide a concrete baseline for the AMD chip, but they cannot be contrasted with any Intel figures. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has a percentile of 50, which suggests it sits near the median of all CPUs in the database, but the lack of raw scores leaves its actual performance unknown.

The data shows that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is a tested and measured processor with substantial multi-core and single-core capabilities. The Intel Core 5 223PTE is listed with specifications but no performance results, so any claims about its benchmark behavior would be speculation. The only quantitative comparison available is the percentile ranking, where AMD sits 37 percentile points higher. This gap indicates a significant difference in recorded performance, but it stems entirely from the absence of Intel data rather than a direct contest.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the data, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins in every measurable benchmark category because it has recorded scores and the Intel Core 5 223PTE has none. The AMD chip delivers a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2842 and a single-core score of 303. Its R23 results, 18698 multi-core and 1992 single-core, show strong threaded and single-threaded performance. Geekbench scores of 13760 multi-core and 2253 single-core further reinforce its position. PassMark tests, including data compression at 354510, random string sorting at 39447, and prime number finding at 117, all contribute to its 40048 average.

The Intel Core 5 223PTE cannot be assigned any wins because its benchmark array is empty. The database records its percentile as 50, which is lower than the AMD part's 87th percentile, but no specific test results exist to analyze. The AMD processor's wins are therefore absolute in this comparison, but they are wins by default rather than by demonstrated superiority in a head-to-head match.

For use-case analysis, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 shows strengths across general computing tasks. Its multi-core scores suggest it handles parallel workloads well, while its single-core scores indicate responsiveness in lighter tasks. The Intel part's specifications, including 8 cores and 16 threads, suggest it could handle similar workloads, but the lack of data prevents any conclusion about its actual performance. The AMD chip's 10 cores and 20 threads provide a structural advantage on paper, but only benchmark results would confirm real-world behavior.

The data implies that the AMD processor is the only verified performer in this pairing. Any user relying on measured outcomes would choose the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 based on the available evidence. The Intel Core 5 223PTE remains an unmeasured entity, and its potential cannot be compared without additional data.

The Verdict

The benchmark data delivers a one-sided verdict: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the only processor with recorded performance, and it demonstrates solid results across multi-core and single-core tests. Its average benchmark score of 40048 places it near the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, which scores 40081, a difference of only -0.1%. This proximity suggests the AMD chip performs comparably to a well-known desktop processor, despite being a mobile part. The Intel Core 5 223PTE, with no scores, cannot challenge this standing.

The Intel processor's percentile of 50, compared to AMD's 87, reinforces the gap in recorded performance. However, this is a reflection of missing data rather than a proven deficit. The Intel part has a higher boost clock of 5.40 GHz versus AMD's 5.00 GHz, and a higher base clock of 2.30 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, but clock speed alone does not determine benchmark outcomes. The AMD chip's 16 MB of L3 cache is smaller than Intel's 24 MB, but again, without Intel benchmarks, these specification differences remain theoretical.

For users who prioritize verified performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the clear choice from the data. Its 87th percentile ranking and 40048 average score provide concrete evidence of capability. The Intel Core 5 223PTE, despite its 45 W TDP and desktop segment classification, offers no measured proof of performance. The verdict from the database is straightforward: the AMD processor wins because it has results, while the Intel processor has none.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 223PTE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The Intel Core 5 223PTE has an empty benchmarks array, meaning no recorded scores exist for any test. Its average benchmark score is 0.

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365's best multi-core score?

A: The AMD part's highest recorded multi-core score is 18698 in Cinebench R23, followed by 13760 in Geekbench multi-core.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 averages 40048, while its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 7700, averages 40081, a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core 5 221E averages 40144, a delta of -0.2%.

Q: What is the Intel Core 5 223PTE's launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP for the Intel Core 5 223PTE is $232.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ranks in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 223PTE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 5 223PTE supports ECC memory, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 does not.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Point codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It has 10 cores and 20 threads, with a die size of 233 mm². Its cache structure includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 223PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with 8 cores and 16 threads. Its cache includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The process node difference, 4 nm versus 10 nm, suggests the AMD part uses a more advanced manufacturing technique.

The AMD processor integrates Radeon 880M graphics, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The AMD chip's PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 16 lanes, whereas the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Intel part supports ECC memory, which the AMD part does not.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, with a release date of 2024-06-30. The Intel Core 5 223PTE belongs to the Core 5 generation, with a release date of 2026-03-08. The AMD part is a mobile segment processor with a TDP of 28 W, while the Intel part is a desktop segment processor with a TDP of 45 W. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. These architectural choices reflect different design priorities: AMD focuses on mobile efficiency with a smaller process node, while Intel targets desktop performance with a higher TDP and larger cache.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PTE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz, and the Intel base clock is 2.30 GHz. The AMD boost clock is 5.00 GHz, and the Intel boost clock is 5.40 GHz. The AMD TDP is 28 W, and the Intel TDP is 45 W. The AMD socket is AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel socket is Intel Socket 1700. The AMD process node is 4 nm, and the Intel process node is 10 nm.

The AMD cache includes 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3, while the Intel cache includes 2 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of L3. The AMD integrated graphics are Radeon 880M, and the Intel integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 770. The AMD memory support includes DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel memory support includes DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes, and the Intel PCIe is Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD part does not support ECC memory, while the Intel part does.

The AMD release date is 2024-06-30, and the Intel release date is 2026-03-08. The AMD market segment is Mobile, and the Intel market segment is Desktop. The AMD production status is Active, and the Intel production status is Active. The AMD part number is 100-000001530, and the Intel part number is SA4QL. The Intel launch MSRP is $232, while the AMD launch MSRP is not listed. The AMD die size is 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not listed. These specification differences highlight the distinct positioning of each processor, with AMD offering more cores and a smaller process node, and Intel offering higher clocks, more cache, and ECC support.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 365
5 223PTE
Core Specs
Cores
10
8 -20.0%
Threads
20
16 -20.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.3 +15.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.4 +8.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.3 +15.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.4 +8.0%
Multiplier
20
23 +15.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
45 +60.7%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Strix Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 6
—
E-Core Frequency
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 880M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$232
Part Number
100-000001530
SA4QL
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 9 365 Details View Core 5 223PTE Details