AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 5 211TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 records an average benchmark score of 40048, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 5 211TE averages 15370, which lands in the 69th percentile.

Q: How do the two processors compare in multi-core rendering?

A: In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 18698, which is 53.2% higher than the Intel Core 5 211TE's 12201. The gap widens in Cinebench R15 multi-core, where AMD leads 2842 versus 1229, a 131.2% advantage.

Q: Is the Intel part closer to any rival in overall performance?

A: The database shows the Intel Core 5 211TE sits within a tight cluster of rivals: it trails the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U by 2% and the AMD EPYC 7543 by 0.7%, while leading the AMD EPYC 7702P by 1.6% and the Intel Core i3-1315U by 2.3%.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: Both processors have 10 physical cores. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 supports 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 211TE supports 16 threads.

Q: Which chip supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 does not.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 211TE has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, while the Intel Core 5 211TE uses Intel's 10 nm node. This process gap contributes to a substantial difference in power envelopes: the AMD part carries a 28 W TDP, whereas the Intel part is rated at 45 W.

The AMD chip belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, codenamed Strix Point, and uses the Zen 5 architecture. The Intel chip is from the Core 5 generation, codenamed Bartlett Lake, and the database does not list a specific architecture for it. The AMD processor's die measures 233 mm², while Intel's die is 215 mm².

Cache layouts differ notably. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core on the AMD side. Intel assigns 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache is 16 MB on the AMD chip versus 20 MB shared on the Intel chip.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the AMD part's memory bandwidth is rated at 89.6 GB/s compared to 76.8 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory is supported only on the Intel processor.

PCIe connectivity differs by generation. The AMD chip provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU-only lanes, while the Intel chip offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU-only lanes. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses the Radeon 880M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.

Socket platforms are entirely separate. AMD uses Socket FP8, a mobile-oriented package, while Intel uses Socket 1700, a desktop platform. The AMD part is classified as a mobile segment processor, and the Intel part is classified as desktop. Both parts have locked multipliers and are listed as active in production.

The Verdict

The benchmark data shows a decisive performance split between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins all 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons in the database, with no wins recorded for the Intel Core 5 211TE. The AMD part's average benchmark score of 40048 is roughly 2.6 times that of the Intel part's 15370.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the clear choice for workloads that demand high multi-threaded throughput. Its 20 threads and 28 W TDP deliver Cinebench R23 multi-core results that exceed the Intel part by 53.2%, and its Passmark integer math score is 199.6% higher. The chip also leads in single-thread performance, as shown by a 172.8% advantage in Passmark single-thread tests.

The Intel Core 5 211TE does retain some positional advantages in the broader market. Its percentile ranking of 69 places it near processors like the AMD Ryzen 3 7440U and Intel Core i3-1315U, which means it competes in a lower performance tier. The Intel chip supports ECC memory, which the AMD chip does not, and it offers PCIe Gen 5 connectivity versus Gen 4 on the AMD side. For users who require ECC or PCIe Gen 5 on a desktop platform, the Intel part is the only one of the two that fits.

The socket and market segment split is unambiguous. The AMD processor is a mobile chip on Socket FP8, while the Intel processor is a desktop chip on Socket 1700. Anyone building a desktop system must choose the Intel part solely for socket compatibility. Anyone targeting a mobile platform must choose the AMD part. The performance data, however, consistently favors AMD across every recorded workload.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Intel Core 5 211TE |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.70 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Strix Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 cache per core | 1 MB | 1.25 MB |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 20 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Launch MSRP | None listed | $221 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 dominates the recorded head-to-head results, winning every single comparison. The largest margin appears in Passmark integer math, where AMD scores 101831 against Intel's 33991, a 199.6% difference. This reflects the AMD chip's superior thread count and clock speed in integer-heavy workloads.

Passmark extended instructions shows another major gap: AMD scores 25113, Intel scores 8615, giving AMD a 191.5% lead. This test typically stresses processor instruction set efficiency, and the Zen 5 architecture delivers a clear advantage.

In Passmark data compression, AMD records 354510 versus Intel's 133434, a 165.7% delta. The AMD chip also leads in random string sorting by 165.9%, with scores of 39447 and 14838 respectively.

Single-thread performance is not close. Passmark single-thread shows AMD at 3841 and Intel at 1408, a 172.8% difference. Cinebench R15 single-core tells a similar story: AMD scores 303, Intel scores 173, a 75.1% gap. Cinebench R23 single-core is tighter, with AMD at 1992 and Intel at 1722, a 15.7% lead.

Multi-core rendering results follow the same pattern. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows AMD at 2842 and Intel at 1229, a 131.2% delta. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows AMD at 18698 and Intel at 12201, a 53.2% gap. The smaller percentage in R23 suggests the Intel part scales better in longer rendering workloads, but it still loses decisively.

Passmark multithread reinforces the trend: AMD scores 29467, Intel scores 11685, a 152.2% difference. Passmark floating point math shows AMD at 62802 and Intel at 26150, a 140.2% lead. Passmark data encryption gives AMD 18297 against Intel's 7231, a 153% advantage.

The smallest recorded margin is in Passmark physics, where AMD scores 1704 and Intel scores 1278, a 33.3% lead. Passmark find prime numbers shows AMD at 117 versus Intel's 72, a 62.5% difference.

Across all 15 head-to-head tests, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 records zero losses. The Intel Core 5 211TE does not win a single comparison. The data indicates a processor that belongs to a completely different performance class, despite both chips having 10 physical cores.