AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 3 N350 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and Intel Core 3 N350 occupy opposite ends of the mobile processor spectrum. The recorded data shows a complete sweep: the AMD part wins all 15 head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the Intel part records zero wins. This is not a close contest; it is a demonstration of two entirely different design philosophies, one aimed at sustained performance and the other at minimal power consumption. The Ryzen AI 9 365 sits in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 3 N350 lands in the 66th percentile, a gap that reflects their distinct target markets.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark results indicate a clear division of labor. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins every multi-threaded and single-threaded test, making it the only choice for compute-heavy workloads. Its wins are not narrow; they are often by multiples of the Intel chip's score. For example, in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Ryzen scores 18,698 against 6,274, a 198% advantage. In PassMark integer math, the margin is 101,831 versus 27,669, a 268% lead. The data suggests this processor is designed for content creation, software compilation, and any task that scales with core count and clock speed.

The Intel Core 3 N350, despite losing every benchmark, defines its own "win" category outside of raw performance. With a TDP of 7 watts, it uses a fraction of the power of the AMD chip's 28 watts. The database shows no thermal or power benchmarks, but the TDP figures alone indicate the Intel part is built for fanless designs, long battery life, and low-cost portable devices. Its wins are in power efficiency and platform simplicity, not in benchmark scores. The Core 3 N350's single-channel memory bus and 9 PCIe Gen 3 lanes further confirm its role as a lightweight, entry-level mobile processor.

The AMD chip also wins on memory bandwidth, with 89.6 GB/s versus 38.4 GB/s for the Intel part. This doubles the available data throughput, which directly benefits memory-intensive tasks like data compression and encryption, where the Ryzen leads by 340.7% and 221.4% respectively. In every measurable performance category, from Cinebench to PassMark physics, the Ryzen AI 9 365 is the clear victor, leaving the Core 3 N350 to serve the low-power niche.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between the two is wide. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4nm TSMC process, with a Strix Point codename. It features 10 cores and 20 threads, leveraging a hybrid design of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 3 N350 uses the Twin Lake architecture on a 10nm Intel process, derived from the Alder Lake-N generation. It has 8 cores and 8 threads, with no simultaneous multi-threading, which halves its thread count relative to the AMD chip.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The Ryzen AI 9 365 offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 3 N350 provides 96 KB of L1 per core, but only 2 MB of shared L2 and 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD part's larger L3 cache, combined with its per-core L2, gives it a substantial advantage in workloads that reuse data. The Intel part's smaller cache pool reflects its lower performance target.

The process node difference is stark: 4nm versus 10nm. This explains part of the performance gap, as the smaller node allows higher clock speeds and better transistor density. The AMD chip boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel chip reaches 3.90 GHz. Base clocks tell an even larger story: the Ryzen runs at 2.00 GHz, while the Core 3 N350's base clock is recorded as 0.10 GHz, an extremely low value that suggests aggressive power-saving states. The Intel chip also uses a single-channel memory bus, while the AMD chip uses dual-channel, and the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, whereas the Intel part adds DDR4 support to its DDR5 and LPDDR5 options.

The integrated graphics also differ. The AMD chip uses the Radeon 880M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770. The database does not include graphics benchmarks, but the architecture suggests the Radeon 880M is a more capable iGPU given the Ryzen's higher overall platform performance. The sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel BGA 1264, and the PCIe support differs, with the AMD chip offering Gen 4 with 16 lanes versus Gen 3 with 9 lanes for Intel.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single most dominant result is in PassMark extended instructions, where the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 25,113 against the Intel Core 3 N350's 3,981, a 530.8% lead. This test measures SIMD and vector processing capability, and the gap reflects the AMD chip's modern architecture and higher clock speeds. The Ryzen also dominates prime number finding, with a 485% advantage (117 versus 20), and data compression, with a 340.7% lead (354,510 versus 80,444).

In multi-threaded tests, the pattern holds. Cinebench R15 multi-core shows a 349.7% delta (2,842 versus 632), while Cinebench R23 multi-core shows a 198% delta (18,698 versus 6,274). The PassMark multi-thread score is 29,467 versus 7,382, a 299.2% lead. The AMD chip's 20 threads versus 8 threads explains much of this, but the per-thread performance is also superior, as shown by the single-core results.

Single-threaded performance is closer but still decisively AMD. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the Ryzen scores 1,992 against 885, a 125.1% advantage. PassMark single-thread shows 3,841 versus 1,974, a 94.6% lead. This indicates the AMD architecture is not just wider, but also faster per core. The floating-point math test shows a 253.2% lead (62,802 versus 17,781), and integer math shows a 268% lead (101,831 versus 27,669). Physics simulation, random string sorting, and data encryption all follow the same pattern, with deltas ranging from 221.4% to 290.5%.

The smallest delta is in single-threaded PassMark at 94.6%, which is still a near-doubling of performance. The largest deltas are in extended instructions and prime numbers, both over 400%. No benchmark in the database shows the Intel chip within striking distance of the AMD chip.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 3 N350 has 8 cores and 8 threads. The AMD chip's thread count is 2.5 times higher.

Q: What is the performance difference in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 18,698, which is 198% higher than the Intel Core 3 N350's 6,274.

Q: Which chip has a lower TDP?

A: The Intel Core 3 N350 has a TDP of 7 watts, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel part is designed for much lower power consumption.

Q: How do the memory bandwidth figures compare?

A: The AMD chip supports dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel chip uses single-channel memory with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Are the sockets the same?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core 3 N350 uses Intel BGA 1264.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has an average benchmark score of 40,048, while the Intel Core 3 N350 has an average score of 9,903. The AMD chip is roughly four times faster on average.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every measurable specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 3 N350 uses 8 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 0.10 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 3.90 GHz for Intel. TDP is 28 watts for AMD and 7 watts for Intel. The AMD chip uses a 4nm TSMC process, while the Intel chip uses a 10nm Intel process. The AMD chip has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel chip has 6 MB. The AMD chip supports dual-channel DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel chip supports single-channel DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5.

The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel chip uses Gen 3 with 9 lanes. The integrated graphics are Radeon 880M for AMD and UHD Graphics 770 for Intel. The AMD chip has a die size of 233 mm², while the Intel chip's die size is not recorded. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core for AMD and 96 KB per core for Intel. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB shared for Intel. The release dates differ, with the AMD chip launching on June 30, 2024, and the Intel chip on January 6, 2025. The part numbers are 100-000001530 for AMD and SRPNS for Intel.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the superior processor for any workload that demands performance. It wins all 15 head-to-head benchmarks, with deltas ranging from 94.6% to 530.8%. Its 10 cores, 20 threads, dual-channel memory, and larger cache make it suitable for demanding applications like video editing, 3D rendering, and heavy multitasking. The 87th percentile ranking places it among the top CPUs in the database, and its nearest rivals are desktop-class parts like the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 and Intel Core i9-13905H.

The Intel Core 3 N350 is not a competitor in performance, but it is a different product category. Its 7-watt TDP, single-channel memory, and low clock speeds indicate it is intended for simple laptops, basic web browsing, and office tasks. The 66th percentile ranking shows it is below average, and its nearest rivals include decade-old desktop chips like the Intel Core i7-3770. For users who prioritize battery life and silent operation over speed, the Core 3 N350 may suffice. For anyone needing real compute power, the Ryzen AI 9 365 is the only choice based on the recorded benchmark data.