AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 3 100UL Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows a clear asymmetry between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a full benchmark suite with 17 recorded test scores, while the Intel Core 3 100UL has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The AMD part also holds an 87th percentile ranking among all CPUs, whereas the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. This means the use-case split is defined entirely by what the database can measure, and the Intel chip cannot be credited with any measured wins.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 delivers its strongest results in multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,698 and Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2,842 indicate a processor designed for sustained parallel computation. The Geekbench multicore score of 13,760 reinforces this pattern. The PassMark multithread score of 29,467 and the PassMark integer math score of 101,831 further confirm that the Ryzen part excels when all 20 threads are active.

For single-threaded work, the AMD chip still shows strong capability. The Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 1,992, the Geekbench singlecore score of 2,253, and the PassMark single thread score of 3,841 all point to a processor that handles lightly threaded tasks with ease. The PassMark floating point math score of 62,802 and the PassMark extended instructions score of 25,113 suggest the architecture is well suited to scientific and media workloads that rely on vector math.

The Intel Core 3 100UL, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero average benchmark score mean the database cannot assign it a single win in any measured category. The chip exists in the database with specifications, but no performance data has been captured. This is not a statement about what the Intel part can or cannot do in practice, only that the database currently holds no measurements for it.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 3 100UL has 6 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 3 100UL has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: How do their thermal design power ratings compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core 3 100UL has a TDP of 15 watts.

Q: Which chip has the higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ranks in the 87th percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Core 3 100UL ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Do both processors have integrated graphics?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 includes the Radeon 880M, while the Intel Core 3 100UL includes UHD Graphics 64EU.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core 3 100UL supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 and the Intel Core 3 100UL. The headToHeadBenchmarks field is empty, and the wins counters for both parts are zero. This means there are no paired test results where both chips ran the same workload under identical conditions.

What the database does provide is a full benchmark suite for the AMD part and no benchmarks for the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 17 recorded scores. The Intel Core 3 100UL has none. This absence of Intel data makes any direct numerical comparison impossible.

However, the AMD chip's nearest rivals in the database provide context for its performance tier. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has an average benchmark score of 40,048. Its closest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with an average score of 40,081, a delta of -0.1%. The Intel Core 5 221E sits at 40,144, a delta of -0.2%. The AMD Ryzen 9 270 averages 40,246, a delta of -0.5%. The Intel Core i9-13905H averages 40,313, a delta of -0.7%. These deltas indicate that the Ryzen AI 9 365 performs within a fraction of a percent of these four established processors, despite being a mobile chip with a 28-watt TDP.

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,698 places the Ryzen part in a performance class that rivals desktop processors from a generation ago. The Geekbench multicore score of 13,760 and the PassMark multithread score of 29,467 tell a consistent story: this is a high-throughput mobile processor. The single-core numbers, particularly the R23 singlecore score of 1,992 and the PassMark single thread score of 3,841, show that the Zen 5 architecture does not sacrifice single-threaded responsiveness for multi-core capability.

The Intel Core 3 100UL simply has no measured data to place against these figures. Its 50th percentile ranking is the only performance-related datum in the database, and without a benchmark suite, the ranking cannot be tied to any specific workload behavior.

Specification Differences

The two processors diverge sharply on core configuration. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 uses 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 3 100UL uses 6 cores and 8 threads. This is a 4-core and 12-thread difference in favor of AMD.

Clock speeds also differ substantially. The AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost. The Intel part runs at 1.20 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost. AMD's boost clock is 0.50 GHz higher, and its base clock is 0.80 GHz higher.

Thermal design power presents another clear split. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 carries a 28-watt TDP. The Intel Core 3 100UL carries a 15-watt TDP. The Intel chip is designed for a lower power envelope, which may suit fanless or passively cooled systems, while the AMD chip requires more thermal headroom.

The sockets are incompatible. AMD uses the FP8 socket, while Intel uses Socket 1700. These are physically different platforms, and no board can accept both.

Memory support differs in one notable way. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD's inclusion of LPDDR5X suggests a mobile-focused design, while Intel's DDR4 support indicates a broader compatibility target.

PCIe lane counts differ as well. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). AMD offers double the CPU-attached PCIe connectivity.

The integrated graphics units differ. AMD uses the Radeon 880M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 64EU. The database does not contain comparative graphics benchmarks, so no performance ranking is possible from the recorded data.

Production status is identical: both are listed as Active. Both processors have locked multipliers. The AMD part has a known part number (100-000001530), while the Intel part's part number is listed as unknown.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Strix Point codename. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which the database describes as combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 3 100UL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename, and it belongs to the Core 3 generation.

The manufacturing process nodes are very different. AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own fabs. The smaller process node typically allows higher transistor density and better power efficiency, though the database does not record transistor counts for either chip.

Die size is only recorded for the AMD part: 233 mm². The Intel part has no recorded die size.

Cache hierarchies differ in structure. Both chips use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: AMD uses 1 MB per core, while Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache shows a larger gap. AMD has 16 MB of L3 cache. Intel has 10 MB of shared L3 cache. AMD's total L3 is 6 MB larger.

Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the AMD part at 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth figure. Both chips use dual-channel memory buses. Neither chip supports ECC memory.

The release dates place the Intel chip first. The Intel Core 3 100UL was released on April 7, 2024. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 followed on June 30, 2024. Both are currently listed as Active in production.

The market segment labels differ. The AMD chip is classified as Mobile, while the Intel chip is classified as Desktop, despite both being low-power parts. The Intel chip's Raptor Lake-PS codename suggests it targets embedded or industrial desktop applications, while the AMD Strix Point targets thin-and-light laptops.

The Verdict

The database presents a one-sided picture. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has a complete benchmark record, a strong 87th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of 40,048 that places it within 0.7% of four established rivals. The Intel Core 3 100UL has no recorded benchmarks, a 50th percentile ranking, and an average benchmark score of zero.

The AMD chip clearly serves workloads that demand high thread counts. Its 10 cores and 20 threads, combined with a 5.00 GHz boost clock, produce multi-core scores that rival desktop processors. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18,698 and the Geekbench multicore score of 13,760 are the standout figures. Single-threaded performance is also strong, with a PassMark single thread score of 3,841.

The Intel Core 3 100UL offers a lower 15-watt TDP, which the database shows is 13 watts below the AMD part. Its 6 cores and 8 threads, along with DDR4 support, suggest a chip aimed at systems where low power consumption and legacy memory compatibility matter more than raw throughput. The data cannot validate its performance because no benchmark scores exist.

For users who need measured performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the only option with recorded data. For users who prioritize the lowest possible power envelope and DDR4 support, the Intel Core 3 100UL has specification-level advantages, but the database contains no evidence of its performance capabilities. The percentile gap, 87 versus 50, is the only direct performance comparison the database supports, and it favors AMD decisively.