AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 vs Intel Core 3 100HL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data delivers a decisive verdict: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins 14 of the 15 head-to-head comparisons against the Intel Core 3 100HL. The only Intel victory comes in Cinebench R23 single-core, where it leads by 5.6% (2110 vs. 1992). Every other measured workload favors AMD, often by substantial margins.

The largest single delta appears in PassMark's find prime numbers test, where the AMD part scores 117 versus Intel's 48, a 143.8% advantage. That result points to a major gap in integer-heavy computational loops. Similarly, PassMark extended instructions shows AMD at 25113 against Intel's 12463, a 101.5% lead, indicating a large difference in SIMD or specialized instruction throughput.

Multi-core rendering confirms the pattern. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD scores 2842 versus Intel's 1506, an 88.7% delta. Cinebench R23 multi-core narrows the gap but still favors AMD: 18698 versus 14948, a 25.1% lead. The R23 result is notable because it shows Intel closing some ground under sustained load, but AMD remains firmly ahead.

Data-oriented workloads follow the same trend. PassMark data compression shows AMD at 354510 versus 202225, a 75.3% lead. Data encryption favors AMD by 52.9% (18297 vs. 11964). Integer math delivers an 80.8% edge (101831 vs. 56308), while floating-point math shows a 49.1% advantage (62802 vs. 42108). Random string sorting, a memory-latency-sensitive test, still goes to AMD by 69.9% (39447 vs. 23223).

The multi-threaded PassMark score reinforces the hierarchy: AMD scores 29467, Intel 17586, a 67.6% delta. Physics simulation, another multi-threaded workload, shows AMD at 1704 versus 928, an 83.6% advantage. Even in single-threaded PassMark, where the two are closest, AMD wins by a slim 2.8% (3841 vs. 3735). Cinebench R15 single-core also goes to AMD by 42.9% (303 vs. 212), a result that contrasts sharply with the R23 single-core win for Intel.

Overall, the average benchmark score for AMD sits at 40048, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Intel's average is 23545, at the 76th percentile. The nearest rival for AMD is the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 with an average score of 40081, a delta of -0.1%. Intel's closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U at 23709, a delta of -0.7%. These reference points confirm that AMD's lead over Intel here is not an artifact of a weak comparison pool, but a genuine performance tier gap.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins in nearly every category that stresses parallel execution, compressed data handling, encryption, extended instructions, and general integer or floating-point throughput. Its 20 threads, combined with a higher boost clock of 5.00 GHz, give it a clear edge in multi-threaded rendering, physics simulation, and data compression. For workloads that scale with core count and thread count, the data shows AMD dominating by margins of 25% to 143%. The PassMark multi-thread score of 29467 versus 17586 is a direct indicator: for video encoding, 3D scene rendering, or batch file processing, the AMD processor is the stronger choice.

The Intel Core 3 100HL wins only in Cinebench R23 single-core, where its 2110 score beats AMD's 1992 by 5.6%. This suggests that for lightly threaded, short-duration tasks such as single-threaded code compilation or certain legacy application logic, Intel can edge ahead. The Intel part also has a higher base clock (2.10 GHz vs. 2.00 GHz), which may contribute to its single-thread showing in that specific test. However, in the other single-core measurement, Cinebench R15, AMD wins by 42.9%. The PassMark single-thread test also favors AMD, albeit narrowly at 2.8%. So Intel's single-core advantage is isolated to one benchmark, not a consistent pattern.

For memory-sensitive tasks like random string sorting, where cache hierarchy and memory bandwidth matter, AMD wins by 69.9%. That result aligns with AMD's larger L3 cache (16 MB vs. 12 MB) and higher memory bandwidth (89.6 GB/s vs. no recorded figure for Intel). For extended instruction workloads, such as AVX-512 or similar, AMD's 101.5% lead is decisive. The data does not support Intel as a better choice for any multi-threaded or data-intensive use case.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. AMD uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm node from its own foundry. AMD's architecture is Zen 5, with a codename of Strix Point and a generation label of Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c). Intel's architecture is Raptor Lake, with a codename of Raptor Lake-PS and a generation label of Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS).

Core counts differ substantially. AMD offers 10 cores and 20 threads, while Intel provides 8 cores and 12 threads. This 8-thread difference explains much of the multi-threaded benchmark gap. AMD's boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz, compared to Intel's 4.60 GHz. Base clocks are close, with AMD at 2.00 GHz and Intel at 2.10 GHz. Thermal design power also differs: AMD is rated at 28 W, Intel at 45 W. The lower TDP for AMD, combined with higher multi-thread scores, indicates a more power-efficient design per unit of performance.

Cache layouts differ as well. Both have 80 KB L1 per core, but AMD uses 1 MB L2 per core while Intel uses 2 MB per core. AMD's L3 is 16 MB, Intel's is 12 MB (shared). The larger L3 on AMD likely contributes to its data compression and random string sorting wins. Memory support shows AMD accepting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; Intel has no recorded bandwidth figure. PCIe lanes also differ: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), Intel provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). That 8-lane difference could affect expansion options for discrete GPUs or NVMe storage.

Socket compatibility is separate: AMD uses Socket FP8, Intel uses Socket 1700. Integrated graphics differ as well: AMD has Radeon 880M, Intel has Iris Xe Graphics 48EU. Both are marked as active production parts. AMD's release date is 2024-06-30, Intel's is 2024-04-07. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded, so no pricing data is available. AMD's die size is 233 mm²; Intel's die size is not recorded. AMD's part number is 100-000001530; Intel's part number is unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core 3 100HL has 8 cores and 12 threads.

Q: In which benchmark does the Intel Core 3 100HL beat the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365?

A: Intel wins Cinebench R23 single-core with a score of 2110 versus AMD's 1992, a 5.6% advantage. That is the only head-to-head test Intel wins out of 15 recorded comparisons.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The largest gap is in PassMark find prime numbers, where AMD scores 117 and Intel scores 48, a 143.8% delta in AMD's favor.

Q: How do the average benchmark scores compare?

A: AMD's average benchmark score is 40048, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Intel's average is 23545, placing it in the 76th percentile. AMD's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 at 40081, while Intel's nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8540U at 23709.

Q: What are the thermal design power ratings?

A: AMD is rated at 28 W TDP. Intel is rated at 45 W TDP.

Q: Which processor supports a faster memory type?

A: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while Intel has no recorded bandwidth figure.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Intel Core 3 100HL |

|----------------|---------------------|---------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 8 |

| Threads | 20 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Strix Point | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS) |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | Iris Xe Graphics 48EU |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2024-06-30 | 2024-04-07 |

| Part Number | 100-000001530 | unknown |

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the stronger processor in 14 of 15 direct comparisons, with an average benchmark score 70% higher than the Intel Core 3 100HL (40048 vs. 23545). For any workload that benefits from more threads, larger cache, higher boost clock, or faster memory bandwidth, AMD is the correct selection. The 20-thread configuration and 5.00 GHz boost clock provide a clear advantage in multi-threaded rendering, data compression, encryption, and floating-point math.

The Intel Core 3 100HL offers a single point of superiority: Cinebench R23 single-core performance, where it beats AMD by 5.6%. That result, combined with its higher base clock, suggests it can handle short, single-threaded bursts slightly better in one specific rendering test. However, the broader single-thread picture favors AMD, with wins in Cinebench R15 single-core by 42.9% and PassMark single-thread by 2.8%.

For users prioritizing multi-core throughput, data processing, or extended instruction workloads, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the data-supported choice. Its lower TDP of 28 W versus Intel's 45 W also indicates better energy efficiency per unit of performance. The Intel part may appeal to systems constrained to the LGA 1700 socket or requiring DDR4 memory support, but on raw benchmark results, it cannot match AMD's output. The database records no scenario where Intel's single win outweighs AMD's 14 victories.