AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-14700T

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 20 Cores / 28 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.3 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 33 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 35W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,457
2,618
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
220
369
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
16,054
25,980
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,010
3,667
passmark_data_compression
294,298
354,216
passmark_data_encryption
14,925
21,277
passmark_extended_instructions
20,778
20,052
passmark_find_prime_numbers
84
145
passmark_floating_point_math
52,971
79,042
passmark_integer_math
86,227
113,854
passmark_multithread
24,779
30,571
passmark_physics
1,337
1,946
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,344
38,546
passmark_single_thread
3,955
3,905
passmark_singlethread
3,955
3,905
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,911
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,540

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs Intel Core i7-14700T

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark record splits decisively in favor of the Intel Core i7-14700T, which takes 12 of the 15 head-to-head comparisons. Its wins are concentrated in heavily threaded workloads, memory-sensitive operations, and Cinebench rendering. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins only three tests: extended instruction handling, and two nearly identical single-thread PassMark listings.

The Intel part dominates multi-core scenarios. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it posts a score of 25980 versus 16054 for the AMD chip, a gap of 38.2%. The PassMark multi-thread test shows a similar pattern, with Intel at 30571 and AMD at 24779, a 18.9% deficit. The Intel processor also wins all three PassMark math tests, including floating-point math (79042 versus 52971), integer math (113854 versus 86227), and prime number finding (145 versus 84). Data compression and encryption workloads also favor Intel, with deltas of 16.9% and 29.9% respectively.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins the extended instructions test with 20778 against 20052, a 3.6% margin. Its PassMark single-thread score of 3955 edges out the Intel chip's 3905, a 1.3% advantage. These wins are narrow but consistent across the two listings for the same PassMark test.

For single-core Cinebench, the Intel part is far ahead. R23 single-core shows 3667 versus 2010, a 45.2% lead. The R15 single-core test shows an even larger relative gap of 40.4%, with scores of 369 and 220. This is notable because the two chips have nearly identical boost clocks, yet the Intel architecture delivers significantly higher single-thread rendering performance.

The overall average benchmark scores confirm the hierarchy: Intel's average is 41914, while AMD's is 37093. The Intel part also sits at the 88th percentile among all CPUs, compared to the 85th percentile for the AMD part.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher multi-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T wins every multi-core benchmark. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 25980 versus 16054 for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, a 38.2% lead. The PassMark multi-thread test shows 30571 against 24779, an 18.9% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD chip win any benchmark at all?

A: Yes. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins the PassMark extended instructions test with 20778 against 20052, a 3.6% margin. It also wins the PassMark single-thread test with 3955 versus 3905, a 1.3% edge.

Q: How do the single-core Cinebench scores compare?

A: The Intel part leads by a wide margin. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 3667 against AMD's 2010, a 45.2% difference. The R15 single-core test shows Intel at 369 versus AMD at 220, a 40.4% gap.

Q: What is the difference in CPU core and thread counts?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has higher base and boost clocks?

A: The AMD part has a higher base clock at 2.00 GHz versus 1.30 GHz for Intel. The Intel part has a slightly higher boost clock at 5.20 GHz versus 5.10 GHz for AMD.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core i7-14700T has a TDP of 35 watts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single win for the Intel Core i7-14700T appears in Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 3667 against 2010, a 45.2% advantage. This is the biggest delta in the entire head-to-head set. The R15 single-core test follows closely with a 40.4% lead (369 versus 220). These two results indicate that the Intel architecture has a substantial per-thread rendering advantage despite the similar boost clocks.

In multi-core rendering, the Intel part scores 25980 in Cinebench R23, which is 38.2% higher than the AMD chip's 16054. The R15 multi-core test shows a smaller but still meaningful lead of 6.1%, with 2618 versus 2457. The large difference between the R23 and R15 multi-core deltas suggests the Intel chip scales more effectively under longer, more sustained multi-threaded loads.

The PassMark suite reinforces the Intel lead in compute-heavy tasks. Floating-point math shows a 33% advantage (79042 versus 52971). Integer math shows a 24.3% lead (113854 versus 86227). Prime number finding shows a 42.1% lead (145 versus 84). These three tests illustrate a consistent pattern where the Intel part handles mathematical workloads with considerably more throughput.

Data-oriented tasks follow the same trend. Data compression scores 354216 for Intel versus 294298 for AMD, a 16.9% gap. Data encryption shows 21277 versus 14925, a 29.9% gap. Random string sorting shows 38546 versus 32344, a 16.1% gap. The PassMark physics test also favors Intel, with 1946 versus 1337, a 31.3% margin.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 secures its wins in two areas. The extended instructions test shows 20778 versus 20052, a 3.6% margin. The PassMark single-thread test shows 3955 versus 3905, a 1.3% margin. Both wins are modest compared to the Intel leads, and neither appears in the Cinebench suite.

The overall score distribution is lopsided: Intel wins 12 tests, AMD wins 3. The average benchmark score for Intel is 41914, which is 13% higher than AMD's 37093. The nearest rival data for each chip shows that the Intel part sits near the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS (delta of -0.1%), while the AMD part sits near the Intel Core i9-12900T (delta of -0.1%).

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every physical and electrical specification. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i7-14700T uses 20 cores and 28 threads. Base clocks differ substantially: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.30 GHz. Boost clocks are close, with Intel at 5.20 GHz and AMD at 5.10 GHz.

Thermal design power differs by 7 watts: AMD is rated at 28 watts, Intel at 35 watts. The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD chip is a mobile part, while the Intel chip is a desktop part.

Cache layouts differ. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core. L2 is 1 MB per core on AMD and 2 MB per core on Intel. L3 is 8 MB on AMD, while Intel has 33 MB shared L3. This cache difference is likely a factor in the Intel lead in data-heavy workloads.

Memory support varies. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with dual-channel memory and a bandwidth rating of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, with no bandwidth figure recorded. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon 860M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 770.

The process nodes are different: AMD is built on a 4 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own foundry. Die sizes are 195 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel. Release dates differ: AMD was released on 2026-01-04, Intel on 2024-01-07. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $384; the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

The core count difference is fundamental. AMD's 8 cores and 16 threads represent a compact configuration, while Intel's 20 cores and 28 threads indicate a hybrid arrangement typical of Raptor Lake. The L3 cache difference is stark: 8 MB on AMD versus 33 MB shared on Intel. This larger shared cache likely explains part of the Intel advantage in data compression, encryption, and sorting tasks.

The memory controller differs in supported types. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a documented bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, which gives platform flexibility but no recorded bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory, which is relevant for workstation-class applications.

PCIe generation differs, with Intel offering Gen 5 and AMD offering Gen 4. Both provide 16 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics differ as well, with AMD using the Radeon 860M and Intel using UHD Graphics 770. Neither is the primary focus of the benchmark data, but the difference is recorded.

The market segments differ: AMD is a mobile processor, Intel is a desktop processor. This aligns with the socket difference and the TDP difference. The AMD part consumes 28 watts, which is typical for a mobile chip, while the Intel part consumes 35 watts, which is low for a desktop part but still higher than the AMD chip.

The Verdict

The benchmark data favors the Intel Core i7-14700T for nearly every measured workload. It wins 12 of 15 head-to-head tests, including all Cinebench tests, all PassMark math tests, all data processing tests, and the PassMark physics test. The margins are often large: 45.2% in Cinebench R23 single-core, 38.2% in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 42.1% in prime number finding, and 33% in floating-point math. The Intel part also has a higher average benchmark score (41914 versus 37093) and a higher percentile ranking (88th versus 85th).

Users who prioritize rendering, mathematical computation, data compression, encryption, or physics simulation should select the Intel Core i7-14700T. Its 20 cores, 28 threads, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache provide a clear throughput advantage in multi-threaded and data-intensive scenarios.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins only three tests, with margins of 3.6% and 1.3%. It leads in extended instruction handling and PassMark single-thread performance. Its lower TDP of 28 watts, smaller die size of 195 mm², and mobile form factor make it suitable for compact or power-constrained systems. Users who need a mobile processor with competitive single-thread PassMark scores and a small physical footprint may prefer this part.

The recorded data does not show a scenario where the AMD chip matches or exceeds the Intel chip in a major workload category. The Intel part leads in every rendering benchmark, every math benchmark, and every data processing benchmark. The database positions the Intel part near the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS and the AMD part near the Intel Core i9-12900T, which further indicates that the Intel i7-14700T operates in a higher performance tier.

The choice depends on the use case: desktop users with room for a 35-watt processor and a need for high multi-core throughput should pick the Intel Core i7-14700T. Mobile users who value a 28-watt part with a smaller die and acceptable single-thread PassMark results should consider the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450. The benchmark record provides no evidence of a third option.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 PRO 450
i7-14700T
Core Specs
Cores
8
20 +150.0%
Threads
16
28 +75.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
1.3 -35.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
5.2 +2.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
1.3 -35.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
5.2 +2.0%
Multiplier
20
13 -35.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
33 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
35 +25.0%
PL1
—
35 W
PL2
—
106 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Gorgon Point
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
195 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
5600 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 series
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 4
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
900 MHz up to 3.7 GHz
P-Core Turbo
—
5.0 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 860M
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$384
Part Number
100-000001865
SRN41
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 Details View Core i7-14700T Details