AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
AMD
AMD

Ryzen AI 9 365

CORE STATE Strix Point
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,457
2,842
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
220
303
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
16,054
18,698
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,010
1,992
passmark_data_compression
294,298
354,510
passmark_data_encryption
14,925
18,297
passmark_extended_instructions
20,778
25,113
passmark_find_prime_numbers
84
117
passmark_floating_point_math
52,971
62,802
passmark_integer_math
86,227
101,831
passmark_multithread
24,779
29,467
passmark_physics
1,337
1,704
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,344
39,447
passmark_single_thread
3,955
3,841
passmark_singlethread
3,955
3,841
geekbench_multicore
N/A
13,760
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,253

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 365

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear overall performance hierarchy between these two AMD mobile processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 wins 12 of the 15 direct comparisons, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 takes 3 wins. The aggregate benchmark score for the Ryzen AI 9 365 is 40048, compared to 37093 for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, a difference that places the former in the 87th percentile of all CPUs and the latter in the 85th.

The most decisive victory for the Ryzen AI 9 365 comes in Cinebench R15 single-core, where it scores 303 against 220 for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, a 27.4% advantage. That gap is substantial and indicates a meaningful difference in lightly threaded workloads. The Ryzen AI 9 365 also wins Cinebench R15 multi-core with 2842 versus 2457, a 13.5% lead, and Cinebench R23 multi-core with 18698 versus 16054, a 14.1% edge.

In the Passmark suite, the Ryzen AI 9 365 dominates across most tests. The largest relative win is in find prime numbers, where it scores 117 against 84, a 28.2% advantage. Physics tests show a 21.5% lead (1704 versus 1337). Data encryption favors the Ryzen AI 9 365 by 18.4% (18297 versus 14925). Random string sorting goes 39447 versus 32344, an 18% gap. Extended instructions show 25113 versus 20778, a 17.3% difference. Data compression delivers 354510 versus 294298, a 17% edge. Multi-thread performance is 29467 versus 24779, a 15.9% lead. Floating point math runs 62802 versus 52971, a 15.7% advantage, and integer math scores 101831 versus 86227, a 15.3% margin.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 fights back in single-threaded tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it edges ahead with 2010 versus 1992, a 0.9% win. In Passmark single-thread, it records 3955 versus 3841, a 3% advantage. Those two wins, plus the duplicate Passmark single-thread listing, account for its 3 total victories. The Ryzen AI 9 365 still leads in the other 12 comparisons, but the single-core results show the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is not without merit in lightly threaded scenarios.

Architecture Differences

Both processors share the same fundamental design lineage. They use the Zen 5 architecture, are built on a 4 nm TSMC process, and fit into the AMD Socket FP8. Both have a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a 28 W TDP. Memory support is identical: DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. PCIe connectivity matches as well, with Gen 4 and 16 lanes from the CPU.

The core configuration differs meaningfully. The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads. That extra pair of cores, and the associated four threads, directly explains much of the multi-threaded performance gap. The boost clock also differs slightly: the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 reaches 5.10 GHz, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 tops out at 5.00 GHz. That 0.10 GHz advantage helps account for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450's single-core wins.

Cache allocation shows a notable split. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core. The difference appears in L3 cache: the Ryzen AI 9 365 has 16 MB, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has only 8 MB. Doubling the L3 cache gives the Ryzen AI 9 365 a meaningful advantage in workloads that revisit data frequently, such as compression and encryption, where it leads by 17% and 18.4% respectively.

The die size differs as well. The Ryzen AI 9 365, codenamed Strix Point, measures 233 mm², while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, codenamed Gorgon Point, is smaller at 195 mm². The larger die accommodates the additional cores and cache. The integrated graphics also differ: the Ryzen AI 9 365 uses the Radeon 880M, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 uses the Radeon 860M. ECC memory support is present on the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 but absent on the Ryzen AI 9 365, a feature that may matter in professional or reliability-focused deployments.

Generation and release timing differ. The Ryzen AI 9 365 belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation with a release date of June 30, 2024. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation with a release date of January 4, 2026. Both remain in active production. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen AI 9 365 is the clear choice for multi-threaded and throughput-oriented workloads. Its 10 cores and 20 threads, combined with 16 MB of L3 cache, deliver consistent double-digit leads across Cinebench multi-core and nearly every Passmark test. The data shows advantages ranging from 13.5% in Cinebench R15 multi-core to 28.2% in find prime numbers. For video rendering, data compression, encryption, physics simulation, and heavy integer or floating-point math, the Ryzen AI 9 365 provides substantially more throughput. Its aggregate benchmark score of 40048 places it in the 87th percentile, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 at 40081 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core 5 221E at 40144 (0.2% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 9 270 at 40246 (0.5% ahead), and the Intel Core i9-13905H at 40313 (0.7% ahead). That cluster of rivals confirms the Ryzen AI 9 365 sits at a competitive performance tier.

The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 wins in specific single-threaded scenarios. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock gives it a 3% edge in Passmark single-thread (3955 versus 3841) and a 0.9% edge in Cinebench R23 single-core (2010 versus 1992). For users who prioritize responsiveness in lightly threaded applications, such as older software, some database queries, or certain scripting workloads, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 offers a measurable, albeit small, advantage. Its aggregate score of 37093 places it in the 85th percentile, with nearest rivals including the Intel Core i9-12900T at 37112 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 160 at 37117 (0.1% ahead), the Intel Core i7-13700 at 37135 (0.1% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 7 7735H at 37161 (0.2% ahead). The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 also offers ECC memory support, a feature absent from the Ryzen AI 9 365, which could be decisive in error-sensitive computing environments.

The Verdict

The benchmark data makes the performance hierarchy straightforward. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 is the faster processor in the vast majority of measured workloads. It wins 12 of 15 head-to-head comparisons, holds a 9.5% higher aggregate benchmark score (40048 versus 37093), and sits two percentile points higher in the overall CPU ranking (87th versus 85th). Its additional two cores, four threads, and double the L3 cache translate into consistent multi-threaded superiority that ranges from roughly 13% to 28% depending on the specific test.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, however, is not without a case. It wins in Passmark single-thread by 3% and in Cinebench R23 single-core by 0.9%, thanks to its higher 5.10 GHz boost clock. It also supports ECC memory, which the Ryzen AI 9 365 does not. For workloads that depend on single-threaded performance, or that require error-correcting memory, the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is the appropriate selection. For everything else, particularly multi-threaded rendering, compression, encryption, and math-intensive tasks, the Ryzen AI 9 365 delivers measurably better results. The data indicates that users prioritizing raw throughput should choose the Ryzen AI 9 365, while those with strict single-thread or ECC requirements should consider the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher aggregate benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 40048, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093.

Q: How large is the multi-core performance gap in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 scores 18698 versus 16054 for the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, a 14.1% advantage.

Q: Does the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 win any benchmarks?

A: Yes. It wins Cinebench R23 single-core (2010 versus 1992, a 0.9% edge) and Passmark single-thread (3955 versus 3841, a 3% edge).

Q: What is the core and thread difference between the two processors?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen AI 9 365 does not.

Q: What is the L3 cache difference?

A: The Ryzen AI 9 365 has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 has 8 MB.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 PRO 450
AI 9 365
Core Specs
Cores
8
10 +25.0%
Threads
16
20 +25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2 0.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.1
5 -2.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2 0.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.1
5 -2.0%
Multiplier
20
20 0.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
16 MB
Power
TDP (W)
28
28 0.0%
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
15-54 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Zen 5
Codename
Gorgon Point
Strix Point
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Process Size
4 nm
4 nm
Die Size
195 mm²
233 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
89.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
AMD Socket FP8
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 4
4 + 6
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.6 GHz
1400 MHz up to 3.2 GHz
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
Yes / 50 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 860M
Radeon 880M
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000001865
100-000001530
Package
FP8
FP8
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 Details View Ryzen AI 9 365 Details