AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G vs Intel Core 3 305 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a dominant performance profile for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G across the shared PassMark test suite. Out of 11 head-to-head comparisons, the AMD part wins 10, with the Intel Core 3 305 taking a single victory. The magnitude of the AMD wins is substantial in several compute-heavy workloads.

The largest margin comes in integer math, where the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 99,732 against 32,295 for the Intel Core 3 305, a delta of 208.8%. This indicates a significant advantage in general arithmetic and logic operations, which often underpin everyday productivity tasks. Data compression shows a similar trend, with the AMD part scoring 402,831 versus 146,857, a 174.3% edge. This suggests notably faster handling of compressed file formats and archival workloads.

Multithreaded performance is nearly double, with the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G delivering 30,422 points compared to 15,439 for the Intel part, a 97% difference. This aligns with the core and thread count disparity, which will be covered in the architecture section. Random string sorting also shows a large gap, 42,663 versus 17,623, a 142.1% advantage for AMD, pointing to efficient memory and cache handling under sorting loads.

Extended instructions, which often reflect SIMD and specialized workload performance, favor AMD by 108.4% (28,223 versus 13,543). Floating-point math shows a 50.6% advantage for AMD (63,683 versus 42,284). Data encryption is 71.9% faster on the AMD side (18,937 versus 11,019). Physics calculations, a lighter workload, still favor AMD by 16.8% (1,440 versus 1,233).

The Intel Core 3 305 takes one clear win in the find prime numbers test, scoring 115 versus 87 for AMD, a delta of -24.3% from the AMD perspective. This specific test measures a tight loop of integer operations, and the Intel part's efficiency in this narrow scenario is notable, though it does not offset the broader performance gaps.

Single-thread performance is closer. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 4,309 versus 3,977 for the Intel Core 3 305, an 8.3% advantage. This indicates that while AMD leads in single-threaded tasks, the margin is much smaller than in multi-threaded or parallel workloads, making the Intel part relatively competitive in lightly threaded applications.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing and design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, using a die size of 195 mm². Its generation is listed as Ryzen AI 400 with a codename of Gorgon Point, and its architecture is based on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading.

The Intel Core 3 305 is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel's own foundry, with the codename Wildcat Lake. It has 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning no hyperthreading support. This fundamental difference in core count and threading capability largely explains the multithread benchmark results.

Cache configurations differ significantly. The AMD part provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has a smaller total footprint: 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. The AMD larger L3 cache, combined with per-core L2, gives it a structural advantage in workloads that repeatedly access a working set.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G uses an AMD Socket AM5, a desktop platform, while the Intel Core 3 305 uses Intel BGA 1516, indicating a mobile-focused package. This is reflected in their market segments, with AMD listed as Desktop and Intel as Mobile. The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, allowing overclocking, while the Intel part is locked.

Memory support shows another split. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X, but the AMD part uses a dual-channel memory bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. PCIe lanes also differ: the AMD provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), versus Intel's Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G carries a Radeon 860M, while the Intel Core 3 305 includes Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. The release dates are close, with AMD on 2026-02-28 and Intel on 2026-04-15. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $309, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the benchmark data, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is the clear choice for multi-threaded and data-heavy workloads. Its wins in integer math, data compression, random string sorting, and multithreaded tests indicate strength in batch processing, file archiving, database operations, and any task that can utilize its 16 threads. The 208.8% lead in integer math and the 174.3% lead in data compression are particularly decisive for users who regularly compress or decompress large files or run complex calculations in spreadsheets or scientific software.

The AMD part also leads in floating-point math by 50.6%, which is relevant for simulations, 3D rendering, and some scientific computing. Its 71.9% advantage in data encryption makes it better suited for secure data handling, VPNs, or encrypted storage operations. The 108.4% lead in extended instructions suggests stronger SIMD performance, which benefits multimedia encoding and decoding tasks.

The Intel Core 3 305 wins in the find prime numbers test, a narrow but specific victory. This workload involves a tight loop of integer operations with minimal memory access, suggesting the Intel architecture handles this particular algorithm more efficiently. For users whose primary workload is a similar tight-loop integer calculation, the Intel part would be the better fit. However, this is a single test out of eleven, and the overall pattern heavily favors AMD.

Single-thread performance is close, with AMD leading by only 8.3%. This means for light, single-threaded office work or web browsing, the difference between the two is modest. The Intel part, with its lower TDP of 15 watts versus AMD's 65 watts, may be more suited for battery-constrained mobile devices, though the database does not include battery life tests. The Intel part's mobile socket and lower power envelope suggest a different use case focused on portability rather than raw performance.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 305 has 6 cores and 6 threads. Base clock speeds are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 1.50 GHz for Intel, with boost clocks of 5.10 GHz and 4.30 GHz respectively.

Thermal design power shows a wide gap: 65 watts for AMD versus 15 watts for Intel. This reflects their different market segments, with AMD targeting desktop and Intel targeting mobile. The sockets differ accordingly, with AMD using Socket AM5 and Intel using BGA 1516.

Process nodes are close but not identical: 4 nm for AMD at TSMC versus 3 nm for Intel at its own foundry. The AMD die size is 195 mm², while Intel has no recorded die size. Cache hierarchies differ: AMD has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3, while Intel has 192 KB L1, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB L3 shared.

Memory bandwidth is a key differentiator: 89.6 GB/s for AMD (dual-channel) versus 59.7 GB/s for Intel (single-channel). ECC support is present on AMD but absent on Intel. PCIe lanes are 12 for AMD versus 6 for Intel, both Gen 4. Integrated graphics are Radeon 860M for AMD versus Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) for Intel.

The AMD part has an unlocked multiplier, the Intel part does not. The AMD part number is 100-000001917, while Intel's is SAE3L. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $309; the AMD part has no listed MSRP. The AMD part's generation is Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), while Intel's is Core 3 (Wildcat Lake). Release dates are 2026-02-28 for AMD and 2026-04-15 for Intel, both marked as Active production status.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 3 305 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 4,309 in the PassMark single-thread test, which is 8.3% higher than the Intel Core 3 305's score of 3,977.

Q: Which CPU is better for data compression?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G scores 402,831 in data compression, which is 174.3% higher than the Intel Core 3 305's 146,857.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 305 win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the Intel Core 3 305 wins the find prime numbers test with a score of 115, compared to the AMD part's 87, a 24.3% advantage.

Q: What are the memory bandwidth specifications?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G has a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel Core 3 305 has a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s.

Q: Do both CPUs support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G supports ECC memory, but the Intel Core 3 305 does not.

The Verdict

The benchmark data clearly indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is the superior performer in almost every measured workload. Its wins in 10 of 11 head-to-head tests, including massive leads in integer math, data compression, and multithreaded performance, make it the choice for users who need maximum processing throughput. The 93rd percentile ranking among all CPUs, versus the Intel part's 72nd percentile, reinforces this position. The AMD part's average benchmark score of 63,331 is significantly higher than the Intel part's 18,302, placing it in a different performance tier.

The Intel Core 3 305 is a lower-power, mobile-focused part with a 15-watt TDP, making it suitable for portable devices where battery life and thermal constraints are primary concerns. Its single win in the find prime numbers test shows some efficiency in specific tight-loop integer calculations, and its single-thread score is only 8.3% behind AMD, so lightly threaded tasks will show a smaller gap. The Intel part also has a launch MSRP of $309, which is the only price point in the database.

For a desktop system where performance is the priority, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 450G is the clear choice based on the recorded data. For a mobile device where low power consumption and a smaller footprint are critical, the Intel Core 3 305 has a place, but its performance ceiling is much lower. The data shows that the AMD part delivers roughly double the multithreaded performance and over triple the integer math performance, making it the stronger processor in almost any compute-intensive scenario.