AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 vs Intel Processor N250 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 vs Intel Processor N250

The benchmark database shows a decisive performance gap between these two mobile processors. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 records an average benchmark score of 26936, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs tracked, while the Intel Processor N250 sits in the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores in the database. The Ryzen AI 7 445 delivers substantially higher multi-threaded and single-threaded performance, backed by a larger core count and higher clock speeds. The Intel Processor N250, designed for ultra-low-power systems, trades performance for a dramatically lower thermal envelope. The data indicates these processors target entirely different segments of the mobile market.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 and the Intel Processor N250. However, the Ryzen AI 7 445 has extensive benchmark results across Cinebench and PassMark tests, while the Intel Processor N250 has none recorded. This absence of data for the N250 makes direct numerical comparison impossible. The analysis below relies solely on the recorded scores for the AMD processor and the architectural specifications of the Intel part.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10590 and a single-core score of 1806. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1723 multi-core and 254 single-core. These results indicate strong sustained multi-threaded performance for a 28-watt mobile processor. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 18115 and a single-thread score of 3591. Integer math scores reach 58332, floating-point math reaches 39362, and extended instructions score 15826. Data compression hits 215812, data encryption scores 10519, and random string sorting reaches 23488. Physics testing produces a score of 976, while finding prime numbers scores 56.

The nearest rivals listed in the database for the Ryzen AI 7 445 provide context. The Intel Core i7-1370P has an average score of 26900, a delta of 0.1 percent from the Ryzen AI 7 445. The AMD Ryzen 5 7545U scores 26849, a 0.3 percent delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051, a negative 0.4 percent delta. The Intel Core i9-9900K scores 27097, a negative 0.6 percent delta. These figures show the Ryzen AI 7 445 performs within a tight band around its nearest competitors, with the largest gap being 0.6 percent behind the Core i9-9900K.

The Intel Processor N250 has no benchmark scores in the database. Its percentile rank of 50 indicates it sits at the median of all tracked CPUs, but without recorded scores, no exact performance figures can be cited. The data suggests the N250 operates in a lower performance envelope, consistent with its 4-core, 4-thread configuration and 6-watt thermal design.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor N250 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The Ryzen AI 7 445 offers both more physical cores and hyper-threading support.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel Processor N250 has a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The AMD part operates at significantly higher frequencies across the entire range.

Q: How do their thermal design points compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Processor N250 has a TDP of 6 watts. The Intel part uses substantially less power, which supports fanless or passively cooled designs.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor N250 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Processor N250 supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory over a single-channel bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: How does the integrated graphics compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses the Radeon 840M integrated graphics. The Intel Processor N250 uses the UHD Graphics 730. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores for either processor.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 outperforms the Intel Processor N250 in every measurable aspect of CPU performance. The Ryzen AI 7 445 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10590 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 18115, figures that reflect strong multi-threaded capability. The Intel Processor N250 has no recorded benchmark scores, placing it at the 50th percentile, which indicates median performance among all tracked CPUs. The Ryzen AI 7 445 sits at the 79th percentile.

The architectural differences reinforce this performance gap. The AMD part uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part uses 4 cores and 4 threads. Clock speeds favor AMD: 4.60 GHz boost versus 3.80 GHz boost. Memory bandwidth favors AMD: 89.6 GB/s dual-channel versus 38.4 GB/s single-channel. The AMD processor also supports ECC memory, which the Intel processor does not.

The Intel Processor N250 offers one clear advantage: power consumption. Its 6-watt TDP is dramatically lower than the 28-watt TDP of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445. For systems prioritizing extreme energy efficiency, long battery life, or passive cooling, the N250 presents a compelling option. The database shows no benchmark scores for the N250, however, so the performance trade-off cannot be quantified numerically.

The recorded data indicates the Ryzen AI 7 445 is the stronger processor for compute-intensive workloads. The Intel Processor N250 is the appropriate choice for ultra-low-power applications where performance requirements are modest.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Processor N250 uses 4 cores and 4 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 0.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz.

Thermal design differs substantially: the AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, the Intel processor has a TDP of 6 watts. The socket types differ: AMD uses Socket FP8, Intel uses BGA 1264. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory over a single-channel bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth.

ECC memory support is exclusive to the AMD processor. PCIe capabilities differ: the AMD part uses Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), the Intel part uses Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the AMD processor uses Radeon 840M, the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD processor has a part number of 100-000001935, the Intel processor has a part number of SRPNS. Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database. Both processors have locked multipliers and are classified as mobile parts. Both are listed as active in production. The AMD release date is recorded as 2026-01-04, while the Intel release date is 2025-01-06.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, fabricated by TSMC. Cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3 total.

The Intel Processor N250 uses the Twin Lake architecture under the codename Twin Lake. It belongs to the Intel Processor generation based on Alder Lake-N. The process node is 10 nm, fabricated by Intel. Cache configuration includes 96 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 shared, and 6 MB of L3 shared.

The AMD architecture uses a modern 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel architecture uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD part has a larger L3 cache at 4 MB, though the Intel part has more L3 at 6 MB. The AMD part distributes L2 as 1 MB per core, while the Intel part shares 2 MB across all cores. L1 cache favors the Intel part at 96 KB per core versus 80 KB per core for AMD. Neither processor has recorded transistor counts or die sizes in the database. Neither processor uses 3D V-Cache.

The Zen 5 architecture in the AMD processor supports 12 threads through simultaneous multithreading, while the Intel Twin Lake architecture operates with 4 threads on 4 cores without hyper-threading. The AMD processor pairs with the Radeon 840M integrated GPU, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 730.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 wins in multi-threaded workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10590 and PassMark multi-thread score of 18115 demonstrate strong parallel processing capability. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration handles concurrent tasks efficiently. The PassMark data compression score of 215812 and integer math score of 58332 indicate solid performance in data-heavy and computational tasks. The floating-point math score of 39362 and extended instructions score of 15826 confirm strong numerical processing.

The AMD processor also wins in single-threaded performance. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1806 and PassMark single-thread score of 3591 reflect the high 4.60 GHz boost clock. The PassMark encryption score of 10519 and random string sorting score of 23488 show capable performance in latency-sensitive operations. Physics testing scores 976.

The Intel Processor N250 wins in power efficiency. Its 6-watt TDP enables systems with minimal cooling requirements and extended battery life. The lower clock speeds and fewer cores reduce power draw substantially. The single-channel memory bus and Gen 3 PCIe further reduce system-level power consumption. For fanless laptops, thin-and-light devices, or always-on portable systems, the N250 offers a lower thermal footprint.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 requires a 28-watt thermal envelope, which demands active cooling in most chassis designs. The dual-channel memory bus and Gen 4 PCIe support higher data throughput for storage and peripheral devices. The ECC memory support makes the AMD part suitable for reliability-sensitive applications.

The database shows no recorded benchmark scores for the Intel Processor N250, so its exact performance characteristics cannot be quantified. The percentile rank of 50 indicates median CPU performance, while the AMD processor ranks in the 79th percentile. For workloads requiring maximum throughput, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is the clear choice. For workloads prioritizing minimum power draw, the Intel Processor N250 offers a distinct advantage, though with unmeasured performance in the database.