AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data presents a challenge for a direct comparison: the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has a full suite of benchmark scores, while the Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark results in the database. The Intel Processor 300T's average benchmark score is listed as 0, with no individual test entries. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, by contrast, has 15 recorded scores across Cinebench and Passmark tests.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445's average benchmark score is 26936. This places it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core i7-1370P, which scores 26900 (a 0.1% difference), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U, which scores 26849 (a 0.3% difference). The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051 (the Ryzen AI 7 445 is 0.4% behind it), and the Intel Core i9-9900K scores 27097 (a 0.6% gap). The Ryzen AI 7 445 effectively sits in a tight performance cluster with these four established chips, all within 1% of each other.

In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 10590 in multi-core and 1806 in single-core. In Cinebench R15, the scores are 1723 multi-core and 254 single-core. These figures indicate a processor that performs well in both threaded and single-threaded workloads. The Passmark suite shows a multi-thread score of 18115, a single-thread score of 3591, and a physics score of 976. Data compression scores 215812, while data encryption scores 10519. Integer math scores 58332, floating-point math scores 39362, extended instructions score 15826, and random string sorting scores 23488. Prime number finding scores 56. Since the Intel Processor 300T has no benchmark data, no head-to-head wins can be calculated for either part. The database shows 0 wins for each processor in the head-to-head category.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is built on the Zen 5 architecture, specifically the Gorgon Point codename, and belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which uses a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-S, and belongs to the Intel Processor generation. It is built on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Core counts differ significantly. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 2 cores and 4 threads. The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no boost clock listed in the database. Thermal design power differs as well: the AMD chip is rated at 28 W, while the Intel chip is rated at 35 W.

Cache configurations also differ. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD chip and 1.25 MB per core on the Intel chip. The L3 cache is 4 MB on the AMD processor and 6 MB shared on the Intel processor. The Intel part has a listed die size of 163 mm², while the AMD part has no die size recorded.

Memory support diverges. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded, and it does not support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity shows the AMD chip using Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel chip uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part has a Radeon 840M, while the Intel part has UHD Graphics 710.

The market segments differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Processor 300T is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor was released on 2026-01-04, while the Intel processor was released on 2024-01-07. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part number is 100-000001935, and the Intel part number is SRN3K. The AMD processor has a production status of Active, as does the Intel processor.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data in the database only covers the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, so the analysis of wins is one-sided. The AMD processor's strengths are visible across multiple test categories. Its multi-thread performance, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10590 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 18115, indicates a strong capability for threaded workloads. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration supports this, as do the 12 threads for parallel tasks. The single-core scores of 1806 in Cinebench R23 and 3591 in Passmark single-thread show that the Zen 5 cores deliver solid single-threaded performance as well.

The Intel Processor 300T, with no benchmark scores recorded, cannot be assessed for wins in any category. Its specifications suggest a different role. With 2 cores and 4 threads, a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and a 35 W TDP, it is positioned as a low-power desktop part. The lack of a boost clock in the database means its peak frequency is not recorded. Its 6 MB of shared L3 cache and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory give it flexibility in memory choices, but without benchmark data, its performance profile remains unquantified in this database.

The AMD part's L3 cache of 4 MB is smaller than the Intel part's 6 MB, but the AMD processor compensates with a larger core count and a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes gives it a connectivity advantage on paper, though the database does not record any test results that would demonstrate the practical impact of this. The AMD part's ECC memory support is a feature the Intel part lacks, which matters for certain reliability-focused workloads.

The Verdict

The data in the database supports a clear distinction between these two processors, but the absence of benchmark scores for the Intel Processor 300T means the verdict must be drawn primarily from the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445's recorded results and the specification differences. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 scores at the 79th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 26936. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-1370P and AMD Ryzen 5 7545U, score within 0.3% of it, indicating that the Ryzen AI 7 445 competes with mid-range to upper-mid-range processors from both AMD and Intel.

The Intel Processor 300T sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the lack of recorded data rather than a measured performance level. Its specifications point to a much simpler dual-core design. The 2-core, 4-thread configuration with a 3.40 GHz base clock and no boost clock suggests a modest part intended for basic desktop tasks. The 35 W TDP is higher than the AMD chip's 28 W, which is notable given the AMD chip has three times the cores.

For workloads that rely on multi-threading, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445's 6 cores and 12 threads give it a structural advantage over the Intel Processor 300T's 2 cores and 4 threads. The AMD chip's boost clock of 4.60 GHz also provides headroom for single-threaded bursts. The Intel chip's lack of a recorded boost clock leaves its peak performance unknown. The AMD chip's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and support for LPDDR5X memory position it for mobile efficiency, while the Intel chip's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 gives desktop builders memory flexibility.

The Intel Processor 300T does have a launch MSRP of $82, which is recorded in the database; the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has no launch MSRP listed. The AMD chip is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700, so they target different system types. The database does not record any head-to-head benchmark results between the two, and the wins count shows 0 for both. Buyers choosing between them would be selecting between a mobile-oriented 6-core Zen 5 chip and a desktop-oriented 2-core Raptor Lake chip, with the benchmark data only available for the former.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 have a higher multi-core benchmark score than the Intel Processor 300T?

A: The database records a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10590 for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445. No multi-core benchmark score is recorded for the Intel Processor 300T, so no direct comparison can be made from the data.

Q: What is the core and thread count for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock?

A: The Intel Processor 300T has a base clock of 3.40 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445's base clock of 2.00 GHz. The AMD processor has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, while the Intel processor has no boost clock recorded.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Processor 300T is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 W.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 | Intel Processor 300T |

|---|---|---|

| Manufacturer | AMD | Intel |

| Cores | 6 | 2 |

| Threads | 12 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.40 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.60 GHz | None recorded |

| TDP | 28 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | None recorded | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | None recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-01-04 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $82 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001935 | SRN3K |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 79 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 26936 | 0 |