AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 vs Intel Core i3-14100F Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 records an average benchmark score of 26936, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i3-14100F averages 18519, which puts it in the 72nd percentile.

Q: How far ahead is the AMD chip from its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 445 sits 0.1% above the Intel Core i7-1370P (avg score 26900) and 0.3% above the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U (avg score 26849). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G by 0.4% and the Intel Core i9-9900K by 0.6%.

Q: What is the Intel chip's closest competitor in the database?

A: The Core i3-14100F is essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-13420H (both average 18511 and 18519, a 0.0% delta). It also sits 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE and 0.8% above both the Intel Core i3-13100 and the Intel Core 7 360.

Q: Which processor wins more head-to-head benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 wins 9 of the 15 head-to-head tests. The Intel Core i3-14100F wins 6, including both single-thread PassMark results and the Cinebench R23 multicore test.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 and the Intel Core i3-14100F list ECC memory support as true in the database.

Q: What are the release dates for these two parts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has a release date of January 4, 2026. The Intel Core i3-14100F was released earlier, on January 7, 2024.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point, belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 generation that mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i3-14100F is built on Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R refresh, using a 10 nm process from Intel's own foundry.

Core counts differ substantially. The AMD part provides 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part provides 4 cores and 8 threads. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the L2 cache differs: AMD gives 1 MB per core, Intel gives 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is a major split: AMD has only 4 MB total, while Intel has 12 MB shared.

The AMD processor is a mobile part on AMD Socket FP8 with a 28 W TDP. The Intel chip is a desktop part on Intel Socket 1700 with a 58 W TDP. The AMD chip integrates Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics (N/A). The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. The AMD die size is not listed, while the Intel die size is 163 mm².

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 dominates in integer-heavy and data-oriented workloads. Its PassMark integer math score of 58332 beats the Intel part's 45357 by 28.6%. Data compression shows a 22.5% lead (215812 versus 176106), and random string sorting shows a 33.5% lead (23488 versus 17596). These results indicate the AMD chip handles sorting, compression, and general integer processing tasks with clear advantage.

The AMD chip also wins in floating-point math by 11.3% (39362 versus 35370) and in extended instructions by 32.1% (15826 versus 11984). Data encryption shows a 17.9% edge (10519 versus 8922). The passmark multithread score favors AMD by 17.5% (18115 versus 15420).

The Intel Core i3-14100F wins in Cinebench R23 multicore by 19.1% (13084 versus 10590) and in Cinebench R23 singlecore by 2.2% (1847 versus 1806). It also takes PassMark single-thread by 4.9% (3778 versus 3591) and PassMark physics by 9.4% (1077 versus 976). The prime number finding test goes to Intel by 8.2% (61 versus 56).

The Cinebench R15 results flip the R23 multicore narrative: AMD wins R15 multicore by 30.7% (1723 versus 1318) and R15 singlecore by 36.6% (254 versus 186). This suggests workload scaling varies heavily by benchmark version and instruction mix.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 | Intel Core i3-14100F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 4 |

| Threads | 12 | 8 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.60 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 58 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Process node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 12 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | None |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Die size | Not recorded | 163 mm² |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $109 |

Both processors are multiplier-unlocked false and share ECC support. The AMD part has an L1 of 80 KB per core, identical to Intel's L1. Neither has a 3D V-Cache option.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single victory for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 comes in Cinebench R15 singlecore, where it scores 254 against Intel's 186, a 36.6% margin. This is an unusually large single-thread gap, given that the Intel chip has a higher boost clock (4.70 GHz versus 4.60 GHz) and wins PassMark single-thread by 4.9%.

Cinebench R15 multicore also favors AMD strongly: 1723 versus 1318, a 30.7% lead. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads versus Intel's 4 cores and 8 threads, which explains the multicore advantage, but the singlecore result points to architectural efficiency in that specific workload.

The Intel Core i3-14100F's biggest win is Cinebench R23 multicore, where it posts 13084 against AMD's 10590, a 19.1% margin. This is notable because the AMD chip has more cores and threads, yet Intel's higher L3 cache (12 MB versus 4 MB) and higher base clock (3.50 GHz versus 2.00 GHz) appear to help in this sustained multithreaded render.

PassMark random string sorting shows AMD's largest computational lead: 23488 versus 17596, a 33.5% delta. Extended instructions follow at 32.1% (15826 versus 11984), then integer math at 28.6% (58332 versus 45357). Data compression gives AMD a 22.5% win (215812 versus 176106).

PassMark data encryption favors AMD by 17.9% (10519 versus 8922). PassMark multithread gives AMD 18115 versus Intel's 15420, a 17.5% edge. Floating-point math shows AMD ahead by 11.3% (39362 versus 35370).

The Intel wins outside of Cinebench are smaller: PassMark physics by 9.4% (1077 versus 976), PassMark find prime numbers by 8.2% (61 versus 56), and PassMark single-thread by 4.9% (3778 versus 3591). The Cinebench R23 singlecore margin is just 2.2% (1847 versus 1806).

The overall win count stands at 9 for AMD and 6 for Intel. The average benchmark score difference is substantial: 26936 versus 18519, a gap of roughly 45% in favor of the AMD part. That average includes all recorded workloads, so it weights the PassMark suite heavily. The Cinebench results show that Intel still holds an edge in specific multithreaded rendering tasks, while AMD dominates the broader computational mix.