AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 vs Intel Core 7 251E Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 445
Core 7 251E
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 vs Intel Core 7 251E
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The recorded database contains a complete benchmark profile for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, while the Intel Core 7 251E has no benchmark entries listed. This means a direct numerical comparison of their measured performance is not possible from the available data. The AMD part's results stand on their own, and the Intel part's capabilities must be assessed from its architectural specifications and market positioning alone.
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,590 and a single-core score of 1,806. In Cinebench R15, it records 1,723 points multi-core and 254 points single-core. These figures place the processor at the 79th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 26,936.
PassMark results for the AMD chip show a single-thread score of 3,591, a multithread score of 18,115, integer math at 58,332, floating-point math at 39,362, and data compression at 215,812. The extended instructions score is 15,826, data encryption reaches 10,519, find prime numbers sits at 56, random string sorting at 23,488, and physics at 976.
The nearest rivals for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, based on average benchmark score, are the Intel Core i7-1370P at 26,900 (0.1% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U at 26,849 (0.3% ahead), the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G at 27,051 (0.4% behind), and the Intel Core i9-9900K at 27,097 (0.6% behind). The data shows that the Ryzen AI 7 445 sits within a tight cluster of comparable processors, with all four rivals within a 0.6% margin. This indicates that its overall performance profile is competitive with established mid-range and older high-end desktop parts, despite being a mobile-oriented chip.
Because the Intel Core 7 251E has no benchmark scores recorded, there are no head-to-head wins for either processor to report. The database does not contain any direct comparison results between these two specific models. The analysis must therefore rely on the architectural differences and the measured performance of the AMD part alone.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses the Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process node, with the codename Gorgon Point. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. Its thermal design power is 28 watts, and it fits the AMD Socket FP8 for mobile applications.
The Intel Core 7 251E uses the Bartlett Lake codename on a 10 nm Intel process node, with a die size of 257 mm². It belongs to the Core 7 generation. This processor has 24 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. Its thermal design power is 65 watts, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700 for desktop platforms. The architecture field for this part is not specified in the database, but the process node and codename are recorded.
Cache configurations differ substantially. The AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache total. The Intel chip also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core, and provides a much larger 36 MB shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel part a significant advantage in cache capacity, which can benefit workloads with large working sets or heavy data reuse.
Both processors support dual-channel memory with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both support ECC memory. The PCIe interface differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives the Intel chip newer and wider PCIe connectivity.
Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses the Radeon 840M, while the Intel Core 7 251E uses UHD Graphics 770. The production status for both is Active. The AMD part was released on 2026-01-04, and the Intel part was released on 2025-01-12. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $384. The AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.
Where Each One Wins
Given that the Intel Core 7 251E has no benchmark scores in the database, the analysis of "wins" must be framed by what the recorded data can support. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has measurable results, so its strengths can be stated directly. The Intel part's advantages are inferable from its specification differences, but they are not backed by measured scores.
The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 shows a balanced profile across the PassMark suite. Its single-thread score of 3,591 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,806 indicate strong per-core performance, which is typical for a Zen 5 mobile part at a low 28 watt TDP. The data compression score of 215,812 is the highest of its PassMark results, suggesting efficiency in data-heavy tasks. The multithread score of 18,115 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10,590 are respectable for a 6-core, 12-thread chip.
The Intel Core 7 251E, with 24 cores and 32 threads, offers a much higher core count. The database records its boost clock at 5.60 GHz, which is 1.0 GHz higher than the AMD part's 4.60 GHz boost. Its 36 MB shared L3 cache is 32 MB larger than the AMD part's 4 MB L3. These specifications point toward advantages in heavily threaded workloads, large cache-sensitive applications, and scenarios that benefit from higher peak clock speeds. The Intel part also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which supports newer storage and expansion options.
However, the Intel part has a 65 watt TDP versus 28 watts for the AMD part, and a 10 nm process versus 4 nm. The AMD part is designed for mobile use with a low power envelope, while the Intel part targets desktop use with higher power draw. The Intel part's average benchmark score is listed as 0 in the database, which indicates no measured results are available. The AMD part's percentile rank of 79 places it above the median CPU in the database, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile by the same metric, though this is based on a score of zero, which is not a meaningful performance figure.
The practical split is as follows. For mobile users who prioritize power efficiency, compact systems, and solid single-threaded performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has recorded data to support its capability. For desktop users who need massive multi-core throughput, higher cache capacity, and the latest PCIe connectivity, the Intel Core 7 251E's specifications indicate it is built for that role, but no benchmark data confirms its actual performance.
The Verdict
The database contains a complete set of benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 and no benchmarks for the Intel Core 7 251E. This asymmetry forces the verdict to be conditional. If the selection is based solely on measured performance, the AMD part is the only option with verified results. Its 79th percentile ranking and average score of 26,936 place it near the Intel Core i7-1370P, AMD Ryzen 5 7545U, AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, and Intel Core i9-9900K, all within a 0.6% margin. The Ryzen AI 7 445 delivers competitive performance for a 6-core mobile processor.
If the selection includes unverified specifications, the Intel Core 7 251E offers a fundamentally different proposition. Its 24 cores, 32 threads, 5.60 GHz boost clock, 36 MB L3 cache, and PCIe Gen 5 support suggest a high-throughput desktop part. The 65 watt TDP and Socket 1700 platform target a different user base than the 28 watt mobile AMD chip. The recorded launch MSRP of $384 positions it as a desktop processor, though the database does not include any performance data to validate its value relative to the AMD part or any rival.
The data shows that the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is a measured, verified performer in the mobile segment. The Intel Core 7 251E is a specification-rich desktop processor whose actual benchmark results are absent from the database. A decision between them depends on platform and workload requirements, but only the AMD part has recorded evidence of performance. The Intel part's claims rest on its architecture and feature set, not on measured scores.
FAQ
Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has an average benchmark score of 26,936, placing it at the 79th percentile among all CPUs in the database.
Q: Does the Intel Core 7 251E have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No, the database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Core 7 251E. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile rank is 50.
Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 7 251E has 24 cores and 32 threads.
Q: What is the L3 cache size for each processor?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 7 251E has 36 MB of shared L3 cache.
Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?
A: The Intel Core 7 251E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only).
Q: What are the TDP values for the two processors?
A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Core 7 251E has a TDP of 65 watts.