AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 vs Intel Core 7 150UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 and the Intel Core 7 150UL. The recorded data for the Intel part is entirely empty, with zero benchmark scores across all tested workloads. This makes a direct comparison of measured performance impossible. The AMD processor, however, has a full suite of recorded results. Its average benchmark score sits at 26936, placing it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 7 150UL has an average score of zero and sits in the 50th percentile, which reflects the absence of any recorded test data rather than actual performance capability.

Since there are no head-to-head results, the only meaningful numeric comparisons come from the AMD part's nearest rivals. The Ryzen AI 7 445 scores 26936 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i7-1370P at 26900 and 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U at 26849. Against the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, the Ryzen AI 7 445 is 0.4% lower, and it trails the Intel Core i9-9900K by 0.6%. These deltas are tiny, indicating that the Ryzen AI 7 445 performs within a very tight band around these established desktop and mobile parts.

For the Ryzen AI 7 445, the individual benchmark results show a clear pattern. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 10590 and the single-core score is 1806. The Cinebench R15 results show 1723 for multicore and 254 for single-core. PassMark tests reveal strong integer math performance at 58332, floating point math at 39362, and data compression at 215812. The data encryption score is 10519, extended instructions score is 15826, and random string sorting is 23488. The single-thread PassMark score is 3591, with a multithread score of 18115. Physics processing records 976, and finding prime numbers scores 56.

These numbers indicate that the Ryzen AI 7 445 delivers balanced performance across both integer and floating point workloads. The compression score is particularly high relative to other metrics, suggesting efficient handling of data throughput tasks. The encryption score is moderate by comparison, which may point to differences in how the Zen 5 architecture handles cryptographic workloads versus general arithmetic.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark data for the Intel Core 7 150UL, the database cannot assign any workload wins to it. The wins column shows zero for the Intel part. All recorded wins belong to the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, but only in the sense that its benchmark scores exist. The AMD part wins in every tested category simply because no Intel results were recorded.

The Ryzen AI 7 445 shows particular strength in data compression, scoring 215812, which is over 10 times higher than its integer math score of 58332. This suggests the processor handles memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads very well. The floating point math score of 39362 is also substantial, indicating strong vector processing capability. The single-thread score of 3591 confirms that the 4.60 GHz boost clock delivers solid per-core performance.

The Intel Core 7 150UL, with its 10 cores and 12 threads, has a higher core count than the AMD part's 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock at 5.00 GHz versus 4.60 GHz. These specifications suggest the Intel part could potentially win in heavily threaded workloads if benchmark data existed, but the database records no such results. The Intel part's 12 MB of shared L3 cache is three times larger than the AMD part's 4 MB, which could favor cache-sensitive applications, but again, no measured data supports this.

The AMD part wins on power efficiency in terms of recorded specifications, with a 28 W TDP versus the Intel part's 15 W TDP. However, the Intel part actually consumes less power by specification. The AMD part uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm Intel process, which typically implies the AMD node is more advanced for power efficiency. The database does not contain measured power draw results, so these are specification-based observations only.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has an average benchmark score of 26936, while the Intel Core 7 150UL has an average score of 0 because no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen AI 7 445 is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-1370P and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7545U. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G by 0.4% and the Intel Core i9-9900K by 0.6%.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 7 150UL has 10 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock speed for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. The Intel Core 7 150UL has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core 7 150UL has 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has 4 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core 7 150UL has a TDP of 15 W.

Specification Differences

The core count differs significantly. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 uses 6 cores, while the Intel Core 7 150UL uses 10 cores. Both have 12 threads. The base clock for the AMD part is 2.00 GHz, while the Intel part runs at 1.70 GHz. Boost clocks differ as well, with the AMD part reaching 4.60 GHz and the Intel part reaching 5.00 GHz. The TDP is not equal either, with the AMD part rated at 28 W and the Intel part at 15 W.

The sockets are different. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. Memory support varies: the AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth value. ECC memory support differs, with the AMD part supporting ECC and the Intel part not supporting it.

PCIe lane counts also differ. The AMD part has Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part has Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics are different: the AMD part uses Radeon 840M, and the Intel part uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The market segment differs, with the AMD part classified as Mobile and the Intel part as Desktop. Release dates are not the same, with the AMD part dated 2026-01-04 and the Intel part dated 2024-04-07.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The process node is 4 nm, and the foundry is TSMC. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 cache is 1 MB per core, and L3 cache is 4 MB. The memory bus is dual-channel.

The Intel Core 7 150UL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-PS. It belongs to the Core 7 generation of Raptor Lake-PS parts. The process node is 10 nm, and the foundry is Intel. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core, L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core, and L3 cache is 12 MB shared. The memory bus is also dual-channel.

The cache structures show a clear difference. The Intel part has a larger L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 1 MB, and a much larger shared L3 cache at 12 MB versus 4 MB. The AMD part's smaller L3 cache is offset by the faster 4 nm process node, which typically allows higher clock speeds at lower power. The Intel part uses an older 10 nm process, which is less dense but still allows a 5.00 GHz boost clock.

The AMD part supports ECC memory, which the Intel part does not. The AMD part also has more PCIe lanes at 14 versus 8. The Intel part supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5, while the AMD part only supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The integrated graphics differ, with AMD using Radeon 840M and Intel using Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, though the database does not include graphics benchmark scores for either.

The Verdict

The database presents an incomplete picture. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 has extensive benchmark data, while the Intel Core 7 150UL has none. This means any verdict must rely on the AMD part's recorded performance and the Intel part's specifications alone. The AMD part's 79th percentile ranking and average score of 26936 indicate it performs comparably to established parts like the Intel Core i7-1370P and AMD Ryzen 7 5700G, with deltas under 1%.

For users prioritizing measured performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 is the only option with verifiable results. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 10590 and single-core score of 1806 show solid capability. The PassMark multithread score of 18115 and single-thread score of 3591 reinforce this. The Intel Core 7 150UL offers a higher core count and boost clock on paper, but the database records no scores to confirm actual behavior.

For workloads that favor many cores and large cache, the Intel part's specifications suggest potential advantages. Its 10 cores and 12 MB L3 cache could benefit parallel tasks. The AMD part's lower core count but similar thread count means it relies on higher base clock and smaller cache. The AMD part's 4 nm process and ECC support may appeal to users needing reliability features. The Intel part's 10 nm process and lack of ECC support may limit its appeal in enterprise settings.

The choice depends on whether verified data matters more than untested specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 delivers confirmed results across a wide range of tests. The Intel Core 7 150UL remains an unknown quantity in this database. Users who need a processor with demonstrated performance should select the AMD part. Users who must have the Intel part's specific socket, core count, or DDR4 support will need to accept the absence of benchmark evidence.