AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

CORE STATE Krackan Point
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 8 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 213PTE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,477
2,192
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
294
309
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
16,014.5
21,751
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,958
3,070
geekbench_multicore
11,676
N/A
geekbench_singlecore
2,164
N/A
passmark_data_compression
304,089
261,083
passmark_data_encryption
15,244
14,413
passmark_extended_instructions
21,678
16,146
passmark_find_prime_numbers
80
157
passmark_floating_point_math
53,230
71,722
passmark_integer_math
85,651
93,109
passmark_multithread
24,935
25,590
passmark_physics
1,349
2,199
passmark_random_string_sorting
33,266
30,106
passmark_single_thread
3,834
3,718
passmark_singlethread
3,834
3,718
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
9,135
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,289

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 vs Intel Core 5 213PTE

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data splits these two processors into distinct usage profiles. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 takes 7 benchmark wins, while the Intel Core 5 213PTE takes 8, but the nature of those wins matters more than the raw count.

The AMD side dominates in data-oriented workloads. It leads by 16.5% in PassMark data compression, 5.8% in data encryption, and 34.3% in extended instructions. Random string sorting also goes to AMD with a 10.5% advantage. These are the kinds of tasks that benefit from efficient instruction handling and memory subsystem behavior rather than raw clock speed.

The Intel side wins in the heavier compute categories. Cinebench R23 multicore goes to Intel by 26.4%, and the same test in R15 goes to AMD by 13%, which is an unusual split. Intel also takes floating point math by 25.8%, integer math by 8%, prime number finding by 49%, physics by 38.7%, and the PassMark multithread test by 2.6%. Single-threaded PassMark goes to AMD by 3.1%, while Cinebench R23 single-core goes to Intel by 36.2%.

The pattern suggests Intel's chip sustains peak throughput in long-running threaded workloads like rendering and physics simulation, while AMD's chip handles compression, encryption, and instruction-heavy tasks with better relative efficiency. For a user whose primary load is Cinebench-style rendering, Intel is the clear winner. For archive management, encryption, or workloads that exercise extended instruction sets, AMD is the stronger pick.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 uses Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, under the Krackan Point codename. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which mixes Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core 5 213PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename on Intel's 10 nm process, with no specific architecture name recorded in the database.

Both chips have 8 cores and 16 threads, so the thread count is identical. The differences appear in cache and platform support. AMD allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of shared L3. Intel also uses 80 KB of L1 per core but doubles L2 to 2 MB per core and provides 24 MB of shared L3. That larger L3 cache likely explains some of Intel's advantage in cache-sensitive threaded workloads like Cinebench R23.

Memory support diverges significantly. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel access, delivering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but caps at 76.8 GB/s. The AMD part also has a smaller die at 195 mm², while Intel's die size is not recorded. The process node difference is substantial: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which gives AMD a transistor density advantage.

Platform features separate the two as well. AMD uses the FP8 socket, a mobile-focused package, with PCIe Gen 4 and 16 CPU lanes. Intel uses Socket 1700, a desktop socket, with PCIe Gen 5 and 16 CPU lanes. Intel's part supports ECC memory, while AMD's does not. Integrated graphics differ: AMD includes Radeon 860M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD chip has a 28 W TDP, while Intel's sits at 45 W. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

Release timing also differs. AMD's chip entered production in January 2025, while Intel's is dated March 2026. Both are listed as active production parts. Intel's boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz versus AMD's 5.00 GHz, and Intel's base clock is 2.10 GHz versus 2.00 GHz. These clock advantages align with Intel's wins in clock-sensitive single-threaded tests.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The biggest single win for AMD comes in PassMark extended instructions, where the Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 21678 against Intel's 16146, a 34.3% lead. That is the largest margin in either direction across the entire benchmark set. The closest comparison in AMD's favor is data compression at 304089 versus 261083, a 16.5% advantage. Random string sorting adds another AMD win at 33266 versus 30106, a 10.5% margin. Data encryption is tighter, 15244 versus 14413, a 5.8% edge. PassMark single-thread also favors AMD, 3834 versus 3718, a 3.1% margin. The R15 multicore result rounds out AMD's wins, 2477 versus 2192, a 13% advantage.

Intel's response comes in the rendering and compute tests. The largest Intel margin is in Cinebench R23 single-core, 3070 versus 1958, a 36.2% lead. Prime number finding goes to Intel by 49%, 157 versus 80. Physics follows at 2199 versus 1349, a 38.7% margin. Cinebench R23 multicore shows 21751 versus 16014.5, a 26.4% lead. Floating point math delivers 71722 versus 53230, a 25.8% edge. Integer math is closer, 93109 versus 85651, an 8% margin. The PassMark multithread test is the narrowest Intel win at 25590 versus 24935, just 2.6%.

The R15 and R23 multicore results tell a complicated story. AMD wins R15 multicore by 13%, but Intel wins R23 multicore by 26.4%. The R23 workload is heavier and longer-running, which suggests Intel's higher TDP and larger L3 cache allow it to sustain performance where AMD's 28 W envelope causes it to fall behind. The single-core split is even more pronounced: Intel wins R23 single-core by 36.2%, yet AMD wins PassMark single-thread by 3.1%. Different benchmark methodologies produce different rankings, and the database shows both chips winning convincingly in their preferred tests.

The overall benchmark averages reflect a close race. AMD's average benchmark score is 34222, placing it at the 84th percentile of all CPUs. Intel's average is 32924, at the 83rd percentile. AMD's nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 4244P at 34220, the Ryzen 7 3700X at 34260, the Core i5-13450HX at 34333, and the Core Ultra 7 165H at 34083. Intel's nearest rivals include the Core i7-12700 at 32942, the Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D at 33079, and the Ryzen 7 8700G at 33089. Both chips sit within 0.5% of their nearest competitors, indicating that the broader market position is similar even though the individual benchmark splits are wide.

The Verdict

The data defines two clear buyer profiles. The Intel Core 5 213PTE is the choice for threaded rendering, physics simulation, and floating-point compute. Its 24 MB of shared L3, 45 W TDP, and higher clocks translate directly into large wins in Cinebench R23 multicore, floating point math, and physics. Users running CPU-based rendering or scientific workloads will see the 26.4% R23 multicore lead and the 25.8% floating point lead as decisive. The 49% advantage in prime number finding also points to strong integer throughput in specific algorithmic tasks.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is the choice for data compression, encryption, and extended instruction workloads. The 34.3% lead in extended instructions and the 16.5% lead in data compression are substantial margins that will matter in database, archival, and security-related tasks. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, despite the smaller cache, supports these data-moving workloads. The 28 W TDP also makes it the more power-efficient option, though the database does not record power draw figures beyond TDP.

For general-purpose use, the PassMark multithread result is nearly even, 25590 versus 24935, a 2.6% Intel edge. The single-thread PassMark result favors AMD by 3.1%. Neither chip dominates the other across the board. The choice depends on workload mix. Rendering and physics favor Intel. Data manipulation and encryption favor AMD. The percentile rankings are close, 84 versus 83, confirming that these are comparable parts with different strengths.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in Cinebench R23 multicore?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PTE scores 21751 versus the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350's 16014.5, a 26.4% advantage for Intel.

Q: Which processor has better single-thread performance?

A: It depends on the test. Intel wins Cinebench R23 single-core with 3070 versus 1958, a 36.2% lead, while AMD wins PassMark single-thread with 3834 versus 3718, a 3.1% margin.

Q: What are the cache configurations?

A: Both use 80 KB of L1 per core. AMD has 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of shared L3. Intel has 2 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3.

Q: Do these chips support the same memory types?

A: No. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. Both are dual-channel.

Q: Which processor wins in data compression and encryption?

A: AMD wins both. Data compression scores 304089 versus 261083, a 16.5% lead, and data encryption scores 15244 versus 14413, a 5.8% lead.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: AMD uses a 4 nm TSMC process. Intel uses a 10 nm Intel process.

Q: Which chip has better integrated graphics?

A: AMD includes Radeon 860M, while Intel includes UHD Graphics 730. The database does not record graphics benchmark scores for either.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: AMD is rated at 28 W. Intel is rated at 45 W.

Q: Does either chip support ECC memory?

A: Intel supports ECC memory. AMD does not.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 350
5 213PTE
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
2.1 +5.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
2.1 +5.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Multiplier
20
21 +5.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
8 MB
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
45 +60.7%
PL1
—
45 W
PL2
—
219 W
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
—
Codename
Krackan Point
Bartlett Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Die Size
195 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
76.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
Yes
DDR4 Speed
—
3200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
—
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 4
—
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.5 GHz
—
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 860M
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Mobile
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$221
Part Number
100-000001601
SA4QM
Package
FP8
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 7 350 Details View Core 5 213PTE Details