AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 7 345

CORE STATE Krackan Point
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 4 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Krackan Point
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core Ultra 5 336H

CORE STATE Panther Lake
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 1.9 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 18 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 25W
ARCHITECTURE Panther Lake
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,712
2,418
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
271
341
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
11,461
23,991
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
1,818
3,387
passmark_data_compression
237,484
280,340
passmark_data_encryption
11,814
21,291
passmark_extended_instructions
17,003
24,542
passmark_find_prime_numbers
62
299
passmark_floating_point_math
42,621
82,415
passmark_integer_math
63,475
62,070
passmark_multithread
19,927
28,545
passmark_physics
1,089
2,682
passmark_random_string_sorting
25,435
34,402
passmark_single_thread
3,875
4,013
passmark_singlethread
3,875
4,013
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
10,076
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,422

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 336H

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 and Intel Core Ultra 5 336H are both mobile processors aimed at thin-and-light laptops, but the benchmark data shows they occupy very different performance tiers. The Intel part wins 14 of the 15 recorded head-to-head comparisons, often by wide margins, while the AMD chip manages only a single victory. The average benchmark score for the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is 34485, placing it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 averages 29461, which lands in the 81st percentile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive Intel victories come in multi-core workloads. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 23991 against 11461 for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345, a delta of -52.2% from the AMD chip's perspective. This means the Intel processor delivers more than twice the multi-threaded rendering performance. Cinebench R15 multi-core tells a similar story, with Intel at 2418 and AMD at 1712, a 29.2% deficit for the Ryzen part.

Single-core performance also favors Intel substantially. Cinebench R23 single-core shows Intel at 3387 versus AMD's 1818, a 46.3% gap. In Cinebench R15 single-core, Intel scores 341 against 271, a 20.5% difference. PassMark single-thread results are closer, with Intel at 4013 and AMD at 3875, a modest 3.4% advantage for Intel.

Synthetic math and physics workloads heavily favor the Intel chip. PassMark floating point math shows Intel at 82415 versus AMD's 42621, a 48.3% lead. The find prime numbers test is the largest gap in the entire dataset, with Intel scoring 299 compared to AMD's 62, a 79.3% differential. PassMark physics also swings decisively to Intel, 2682 versus 1089, a 59.4% margin.

Memory and data processing tests follow the same pattern. PassMark data encryption favors Intel 21291 to 11814, a 44.5% lead. Extended instructions go to Intel 24542 against 17003, a 30.7% gap. Random string sorting shows Intel at 34402 and AMD at 25435, a 26.1% difference. Data compression is closer but still Intel's, 280340 to 237484, a 15.3% margin. PassMark multithread also goes to Intel, 28545 versus 19927, a 30.2% gap.

The single AMD win is in PassMark integer math, where the Ryzen AI 7 345 scores 63475 against Intel's 62070, a 2.3% advantage. This result indicates that despite losing nearly every other comparison, the AMD architecture retains a slight edge in pure integer arithmetic throughput.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has an average benchmark score of 34485, compared to 29461 for the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345.

Q: How do the two processors compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 23991 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 scores 11461, giving Intel a 52.2% advantage.

Q: Is there any workload where the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 outperforms the Intel chip?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins PassMark integer math with a score of 63475 against Intel's 62070, a 2.3% margin.

Q: What is the difference in single-thread performance?

A: In PassMark single-thread tests, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H scores 4013 versus 3875 for the AMD part, a 3.4% lead. The gap is larger in Cinebench R23 single-core, where Intel leads 3387 to 1818, a 46.3% difference.

Q: How do the nearest rivals compare to each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 sits near the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X, which has an average score of 29447 and a delta of 0%, and the Intel Core i5-13500HX at 29270 with a 0.7% delta. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is close to the Intel Core i7-13700HX at 34554 with a -0.2% delta, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 at 34222 with a 0.8% delta.

Q: What percentile does each processor rank in?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 ranks in the 81st percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H ranks in the 84th percentile.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the stronger processor for rendering, physics simulation, encryption, and most math workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 is more than double the AMD chip's 11461, and its 84th percentile ranking puts it ahead of the AMD part's 81st percentile placement.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 should be chosen when integer math throughput is the priority, as it leads by 2.3% in PassMark integer math. It also runs at a 28 W TDP versus Intel's 25 W, and it uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 3 nm process from its own foundry. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, compared to Intel's 16 cores and 16 threads, which explains much of the multi-core deficit.

For buyers prioritizing raw performance across a broad range of tasks, the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the pick. For workloads focused narrowly on integer calculations, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 holds a small but measurable edge. The Intel chip also offers a larger L3 cache, 18 MB shared versus AMD's 4 MB, and higher memory bandwidth at 115.2 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ substantially in core configuration. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H has 16 cores and 16 threads. Base clocks are close, with AMD at 2.00 GHz and Intel at 1.90 GHz, but both boost to 4.60 GHz.

TDP ratings differ slightly, with AMD at 28 W and Intel at 25 W. The AMD chip uses the AMD Socket FP8, while Intel uses the Intel BGA 2540 socket. PCIe support also differs, with AMD offering Gen 4 across 14 lanes and Intel offering Gen 5 across 12 lanes.

Memory bandwidth favors Intel, with 115.2 GB/s versus AMD's 89.6 GB/s. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in dual-channel configuration, and neither supports ECC memory. The integrated graphics differ as well, with AMD using the Radeon 840M and Intel using the Intel Xe3 Graphics.

The AMD part has a part number of 100-000002122, while the Intel part number is SA4RD. Release dates differ, with AMD's processor released on 2025-01-14 and Intel's on 2026-01-04.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 is based on the Krackan Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI 300 generation, which uses a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 4 MB of L3.

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H uses the Panther Lake architecture, also known as Panther Lake-H, and is part of the Core Ultra Series 3. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process by Intel's own foundry. The cache configuration is larger, with 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3.

These architectural differences explain the benchmark gaps. Intel's larger L3 cache and higher memory bandwidth contribute to its strong performance in data compression and encryption tests. The 16-core configuration, even without hyperthreading, gives Intel a massive advantage in multi-threaded workloads like Cinebench R23 multi-core. AMD's hybrid Zen 5 and Zen 5c design, with fewer cores and threads, cannot match that throughput despite the efficiency of the 4 nm process.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core Ultra 5 336H wins in 14 of the 15 recorded benchmarks, making it the dominant choice for multi-threaded rendering, physics simulation, encryption, floating-point math, and data compression. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23991 is the standout result, and its PassMark physics score of 2682 is more than double the AMD chip's 1089. For users running CPU-intensive productivity tasks, video encoding, or 3D rendering, the Intel part is clearly superior.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345 wins only in PassMark integer math, with a score of 63475 against Intel's 62070. This narrow 2.3% margin suggests that integer-heavy code, such as certain database operations or compression algorithms that rely on integer arithmetic, may run slightly better on the AMD chip. The AMD part also carries a lower core count, which may appeal to workloads that favor fewer, higher-clocked cores, though the benchmark data does not show a single-thread win for AMD.

The Intel chip's 84th percentile ranking and average score of 34485 place it among stronger desktop-class processors like the Intel Core i7-13700HX and AMD Ryzen 7 3700X. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 345, with its 81st percentile and average score of 29461, sits closer to the AMD Ryzen 7 3800X and Intel Core i5-13500HX. The data makes the separation clear: the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H is the higher-performing processor in nearly every measurable category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 7 345
Ultra 5 336H
Core Specs
Cores
6
16 +166.7%
Threads
12
16 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
1.9 -5.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.6
4.6 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2
1.9 -5.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.6
4.6 0.0%
Multiplier
20
19 -5.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2.5 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
4 MB
18 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
25 -10.7%
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
45 W
Architecture
Architecture
—
Panther Lake
Codename
Krackan Point
Panther Lake
Generation
Ryzen AI 300 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Ultra 5 (Panther Lake-H)
Process Size
4 nm
3 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
115.2 GB/s
ECC Memory
No
No
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel BGA 2540
PCIe
Gen 4, 14 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 12 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
2 + 4
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 12
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
1500 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
LP E-Cores
—
4
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 50 TOPS
Yes / 50 TOPS
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 840M
Intel Xe3 Graphics
Other
Market
Mobile
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Part Number
100-000002122
SA4RD
Package
FP8
FC-BGA
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Ryzen AI 7 345 Details View Core Ultra 5 336H Details