AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

The Verdict

The database comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE and the Intel Core i7-14700F is defined by a stark contrast in core counts, process technology, and platform capabilities. The AMD part is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on a 4 nm node, while the Intel part is a 20-core, 28-thread processor built on a 10 nm node. The recorded data shows that the Intel Core i7-14700F holds a dominant position in the benchmark results, with an average benchmark score of 53,620 and a percentile rank of 91 against all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has a percentile rank of 50, and its benchmark array is empty, meaning the database contains no direct performance measurements for it.

For the Intel Core i7-14700F, the nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Xeon 6505P at a 0.2% lower average score, the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 0.3% higher, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 0.6% higher, and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 0.8% higher. This places the i7-14700F in a competitive band with high-end desktop and server parts. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has no nearest rivals listed, which reflects its position as a lower-tier processor in the database's ranking structure. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the Intel part is the performance leader for multi-threaded workloads, while the AMD part is a low-power, efficient option with a modern process node and integrated graphics that the Intel part lacks.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700F wins in every measurable benchmark category found in the database. Its 20 cores and 28 threads provide a substantial advantage in multi-threaded workloads, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE, with only 6 cores and 12 threads, would rely on its 4 nm process efficiency and lower 35 W TDP to win in power-sensitive scenarios, but the database does not include power measurements. The AMD part's integrated Radeon 840M graphics give it a capability the Intel part lacks entirely, as the i7-14700F has no integrated graphics. This means the AMD processor can display video output without a discrete GPU, while the Intel processor requires a separate graphics card.

In single-thread performance, the Intel part shows a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,958 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,429. The AMD part's boost clock of 4.80 GHz is lower than the Intel part's 5.40 GHz, which suggests a likely deficit in single-thread speed, though no direct AMD benchmark scores exist to confirm this. The Intel part also leads in memory flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part supports only DDR5. For users who need ECC memory, both parts support it, so that is not a differentiator.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE uses the Gorgon Point codename and is part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node, with a die size of 195 mm². The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Raptor Lake-R architecture, belonging to the Core 14th Gen series, and is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 257 mm². The process node difference is significant: AMD uses a smaller, more modern manufacturing process, which typically yields better power efficiency per transistor.

The core counts differ drastically. The AMD part has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel part has 20 cores and 28 threads. The L1 cache is identical at 80 KB per core for both. The L2 cache differs, with AMD providing 1 MB per core and Intel providing 2 MB per core. The L3 cache is a major difference: AMD offers 8 MB total, while Intel offers 33 MB shared. This larger L3 cache on the Intel part likely contributes to its strong multi-threaded benchmark results.

The memory support differs in scope. AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no memory bandwidth figure in the database. The PCIe specifications differ as well: AMD uses Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part's newer PCIe generation and higher lane count provide more bandwidth for expansion cards and storage devices.

The integrated graphics situation is a key architectural difference. The AMD part includes a Radeon 840M GPU, while the Intel part has no integrated graphics. The AMD part also has a lower TDP of 35 W compared to the Intel part's 65 W, which indicates a lower power draw design. The AMD part uses the AMD Socket AM5, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither supports overclocking. The release dates differ, with the Intel part released on 2024-01-07 and the AMD part released on 2026-03-01.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, it includes a Radeon 840M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i7-14700F has no integrated graphics, so it requires a discrete graphics card for video output.

Q: What is the difference in process node size?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i7-14700F is built on a 10 nm process by Intel. The AMD process node is smaller, which typically allows for better power efficiency.

Q: Which processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE supports only DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i7-14700F?

A: The launch MSRP is $359. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700F rank against other CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F holds a percentile rank of 91 against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,620. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon 6505P at 0.2% lower, the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 at 0.3% higher, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 0.6% higher, and the AMD EPYC 7313P at 0.8% higher.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database has no head-to-head benchmark entries between the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE and the Intel Core i7-14700F. However, the Intel part has a full set of individual benchmark scores, while the AMD part has none. The Intel Core i7-14700F achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,122 and a single-core score of 4,958. In Cinebench R20, it scores 14,751 multi-core and 2,082 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 3,540 multi-core and 499 single-core. The Geekbench results show a multi-core score of 19,620 and a single-core score of 2,429.

The Passmark suite provides additional detail on the Intel part. It scores 413,317 in multi-thread, 4,257 in single-thread, 155,808 in integer math, 107,005 in floating-point math, 505,885 in data compression, 30,144 in data encryption, 28,564 in extended instructions, 55,918 in random string sorting, 2,455 in physics, and 176 in find prime numbers. These figures place the Intel part in a strong position for both general and specialized workloads.

Since the AMD part has no benchmark scores in the database, a direct numerical comparison is impossible. The data only shows that the Intel part's performance is well-documented and ranks in the 91st percentile, while the AMD part ranks in the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0. This suggests the Intel part is significantly faster in all measured categories, but the absence of AMD data prevents precise deltas. The AMD part's advantages lie in its lower 35 W TDP, its integrated Radeon 840M graphics, and its smaller 4 nm process node, all of which are architectural rather than performance benchmark factors.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. The core count differs: the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has 6 cores, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores. The thread counts are 12 for AMD and 28 for Intel. The base clocks are close, with AMD at 2.00 GHz and Intel at 2.10 GHz. The boost clocks differ more significantly, with AMD at 4.80 GHz and Intel at 5.40 GHz. The TDP differs, with AMD at 35 W and Intel at 65 W.

The sockets differ: AMD uses AMD Socket AM5, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. The process nodes differ: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, while Intel uses 10 nm from Intel. The die sizes are 195 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel. The L1 cache is the same at 80 KB per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 33 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support differs: AMD supports only DDR5, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory. The PCIe specifications differ: AMD uses Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only), while Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ: AMD includes a Radeon 840M, while Intel has none. The release dates differ, with Intel released on 2024-01-07 and AMD on 2026-03-01. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $359, while the AMD part has none recorded. The AMD part has a part number of 100-000001922, while the Intel part has a part number of SRN3Z.