AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts of these two processors?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE and the Intel Core i5-14501TE have 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE boosts to 4.80 GHz.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD processor uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel processor uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE and the Intel Core i5-14501TE support ECC memory.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE uses AMD Socket AM5, and the Intel Core i5-14501TE uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, whereas the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has 8 MB of L3 cache.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE and Intel Core i5-14501TE represent two distinct design philosophies. The AMD part, codenamed Gorgon Point, belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation built on a hybrid of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC and has a die size of 195 mm². The Intel part, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, is from the Core 14th Gen series based on Raptor Lake architecture. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel and has a die size of 215 mm².

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD chip provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core, with 8 MB of L3 cache total. The Intel chip also provides 80 KB of L1 per core but has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and a much larger 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This larger L3 pool can benefit workloads that repeatedly access a moderately sized data set.

Memory support also differs. The AMD processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory, which matters for error-sensitive computing tasks.

PCIe connectivity shows a notable split. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core i5-14501TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. That gives the Intel part more total lanes and a faster generation for high-throughput peripherals such as modern GPUs or NVMe storage.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD chip uses Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 770. Neither is a discrete-class solution, but they serve basic display output and light media tasks.

Power envelopes are distinct. The AMD processor has a TDP of 35 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 45 watts. The AMD part is therefore rated for lower power draw, which can simplify cooling in compact builds.

Production status for both is listed as Active. The AMD release date is recorded as 2026-03-01, and the Intel release date is 2024-06-30. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two 6-core, 12-thread desktop processors with identical core counts but different design priorities. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE targets lower power consumption, with a 35 W TDP versus the Intel chip's 45 W TDP. It also uses a more advanced 4 nm process, which typically correlates with better power efficiency per operation. The Intel Core i5-14501TE counters with a higher boost clock (5.10 GHz vs 4.80 GHz), a significantly larger L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB), and faster PCIe connectivity (Gen 5, 16 lanes vs Gen 4, 12 lanes).

The database shows both processors sitting at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, with no recorded benchmark scores or head-to-head results. Without performance measurements, the selection comes down to platform and feature preferences. The AMD part suits a Socket AM5 build with DDR5 memory and lower power draw. The Intel part suits a Socket 1700 build with the option of DDR4 or DDR5 and more PCIe bandwidth for expansion.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not a supported path for either. Both support ECC memory, making them viable for workstation or server-adjacent roles where data integrity is prioritized.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE | Intel Core i5-14501TE |

|----------------|---------------------------|------------------------|

| Cores | 6 | 6 |

| Threads | 12 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.80 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 35 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM5 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 195 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 24 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 12 lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2026-03-01 | 2024-06-30 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded benchmark scores for either processor. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counters for both parts show zero. The average benchmark score for each is listed as 0, and the percentile rank for both is 50.

Because no performance data exists, direct numerical comparisons on compute throughput, memory latency, or gaming frame rates cannot be made from the recorded facts. The only measurable differences come from the specification sheet.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE holds a 0.30 GHz advantage in boost clock over the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE. That is a 6.25% higher boost figure relative to the AMD part's 4.80 GHz. The Intel chip also has 16 MB more L3 cache (24 MB vs 8 MB), which is a 200% larger pool.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has a 10 W lower TDP (35 W vs 45 W), representing a 22.2% reduction in power rating. It also uses a smaller die at 195 mm² versus 215 mm², a difference of 20 mm². The process node gap is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which is a 6 nm difference in feature size.

The AMD part's memory bandwidth is explicitly recorded at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure in the database. That means the AMD chip has a documented bandwidth value, but no comparative claim can be made without the Intel number.

Where Each One Wins

From the specification data alone, the Intel Core i5-14501TE wins on raw clock speed. Its 5.10 GHz boost clock exceeds the AMD chip's 4.80 GHz, which can help in lightly threaded tasks where single-core frequency matters. The larger 24 MB L3 cache also gives it an advantage in workloads that benefit from a bigger cache footprint, such as certain database queries or compression routines. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 16 lanes provides more headroom for high-bandwidth add-in cards and storage devices.

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE wins on power efficiency. Its 35 W TDP is lower than the Intel chip's 45 W TDP, making it more suitable for compact or thermally constrained systems. The 4 nm process from TSMC likely contributes to this efficiency, though the database does not include direct efficiency measurements. The smaller die size of 195 mm² versus 215 mm² suggests a denser design. The AMD part also has a documented memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is a concrete figure for planning memory configurations.

For platform selection, the AMD chip fits AM5 motherboards with DDR5 memory only. The Intel chip fits LGA 1700 motherboards and supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving builders more memory options. The Intel part's 16 PCIe Gen 5 lanes exceed the AMD part's 12 Gen 4 lanes, which matters for systems with multiple high-speed devices.

Neither processor shows a benchmark-based advantage in the database. The choice rests on whether the workload favors the Intel chip's higher clocks, larger cache, and newer PCIe generation, or the AMD chip's lower power draw, smaller process node, and AM5 platform compatibility.