AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE vs Intel Core 7 160UL Comparison

The Verdict

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core 7 160UL, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has no recorded benchmark scores. Consequently, the Intel part holds a 69th percentile ranking among all CPUs, whereas the AMD part sits at the 50th percentile based on its specifications alone. The Intel Core 7 160UL delivers an average benchmark score of 14,232, placing it within 0.3% of the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C (14,277) and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-10400F (14,185). The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE, with no measured data, cannot be directly compared in performance, so the recorded evidence favors the Intel processor for any workload where benchmark scores matter. The AMD part, however, offers a distinct platform advantage with a newer 4 nm process node and DDR5 memory support, which may appeal to users prioritizing platform longevity over measured throughput.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 160UL wins in every measurable benchmark category, as it is the only processor with recorded scores. Its multi-threaded performance is substantial: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 9,386, Cinebench R20 multi-core hits 3,942, and Cinebench R15 multi-core lands at 946. Single-thread results are likewise strong, with Cinebench R23 single-core at 1,325, Cinebench R20 single-core at 556, and Cinebench R15 single-core at 133. PassMark tests reinforce this dominance: multi-thread scores 11,043, single-thread scores 3,391, integer math scores 47,515, and floating-point math scores 25,670. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has zero recorded wins because no benchmark data exists for it. The AMD part does win on paper in platform specifications: it supports ECC memory, offers 12 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only) versus Intel's 8 lanes, and uses a 4 nm TSMC process versus Intel's 10 nm node. These architectural advantages do not translate into measured performance gains in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE, codenamed Gorgon Point, belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, built on a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c design. It has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its thermal design power is 35 watts, and it uses the AMD Socket AM5. The process node is 4 nm from TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². Cache consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, alongside ECC memory support. The integrated graphics are Radeon 840M. The part number is 100-000001922, and it was released on 2026-03-01.

The Intel Core 7 160UL, codenamed Raptor Lake-PS, belongs to the Core 7 generation (Raptor Lake-PS) and uses the Raptor Lake architecture. It has 10 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Its thermal design power is 15 watts, and it uses the Intel Socket 1700. The process node is 10 nm from Intel. Cache consists of 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. Memory support includes both DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel bus, but no ECC support. The integrated graphics are Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The part number is unknown, and it was released on 2024-04-07.

Key differences: the AMD part uses a smaller 4 nm process, supports ECC memory, has more PCIe lanes (12 versus 8), and offers higher bandwidth at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has a higher boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 4.80 GHz), more cores (10 versus 6), more L3 cache (12 MB versus 8 MB), and a much lower TDP (15 watts versus 35 watts). The Intel part also supports DDR4 in addition to DDR5, which may offer broader memory compatibility.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 160UL has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD part supports ECC memory, whereas the Intel Core 7 160UL does not.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core 7 160UL has 10 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 7 160UL?

A: The Intel Core 7 160UL has an average benchmark score of 14,232, placing it at the 69th percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE have any recorded benchmark results?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark scores for the AMD part, so its performance cannot be quantified from recorded data.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 only, while the Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, both with dual-channel buses.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Direct head-to-head comparison is impossible because the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has no benchmark entries in the database. The Intel Core 7 160UL, however, provides a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part scores 9,386, which is a strong result for a 15-watt processor. Its Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 3,942 and Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 946 show consistent scaling across different rendering workloads. Single-core results are equally telling: Cinebench R23 single-core at 1,325, Cinebench R20 single-core at 556, and Cinebench R15 single-core at 133, indicating that the 5.20 GHz boost clock delivers competitive per-thread performance.

PassMark data for the Intel part reveals specific strengths. Integer math scores 47,515, while floating-point math scores 25,670, showing a 1.85:1 ratio that reflects typical CPU arithmetic workloads. Data compression scores 108,953, data encryption scores 7,146, and extended instructions scores 5,832, indicating robust cryptographic and vector processing capabilities. Prime number finding scores 50, which is a low absolute value but consistent with the processor's efficiency-oriented design. Random string sorting scores 11,843, and physics scores 819. The single-thread score of 3,391 matches the single-thread equivalent, confirming repeatability.

The nearest rivals to the Intel Core 7 160UL, based on average benchmark score, include the AMD Ryzen 3 7320C with an average score of 14,277 and a delta of -0.3%, meaning the Intel part is slightly slower. The Intel Core i5-10400F scores 14,185 with a delta of 0.3%, meaning the Core 7 160UL is slightly faster. The Intel Xeon 6756E scores 14,163 with a delta of 0.5%, and the AMD Ryzen 5 3501U scores 14,320 with a delta of -0.6%. These deltas, all within 0.6% of each other, indicate that the Core 7 160UL sits in a tightly contested performance band. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE has no such rival data, as its benchmark array is empty.

For the AMD part, the only quantitative comparison comes from its specifications. Its 4 nm process and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it could excel in memory-intensive tasks, but without recorded scores, any such claim remains hypothetical. The Intel part's 12 MB shared L3 cache versus the AMD part's 8 MB L3 gives Intel a potential edge in cache-heavy workloads, but again, no AMD measurements exist to confirm this. The data shows a clear asymmetry: the Intel Core 7 160UL is fully characterized, while the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 440GE is an unmeasured entry in the database. Any purchasing decision based solely on benchmark data will favor the Intel processor, while the AMD option remains a specification-only choice with untested performance.